Re: [udd] tracking cloned bug relationships

2010-01-22 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 22/01/10 at 10:07 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 01:04:18PM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Well, that information is not available in the bugs metadata (.summary > > file). So we would have to parse the full bug log. Which is not > > necessarily something I was plan

Re: [udd] tracking cloned bug relationships

2010-01-22 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 01:04:18PM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Well, that information is not available in the bugs metadata (.summary > file). So we would have to parse the full bug log. Which is not > necessarily something I was planning to do, but if you submit a patch, > why not. However, I d

Re: [udd] tracking cloned bug relationships

2010-01-21 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 21/01/10 at 15:31 -0800, Julius Davies wrote: > Hi, > > Would it be possible for udd to track cloned bug relationships, much > like it currently tracks merged bugs? > > For example: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=565610 > > --- > Bug 540877 cloned as bug 565610. Request wa

[udd] tracking cloned bug relationships

2010-01-21 Thread Julius Davies
Hi, Would it be possible for udd to track cloned bug relationships, much like it currently tracks merged bugs? For example: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=565610 --- Bug 540877 cloned as bug 565610. Request was from Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva to cont...@bugs.debian.org. (Sun,