Re: [UDD] Request for new field in bugs table: done_date

2017-12-11 Thread Don Armstrong
On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 08:43:09PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > On 11/12/17 at 10:20 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > for the Debian Med bug squashing advent calendar[1] (may be other > > > similar motivations to fix bugs) it would be nice to have a

Re: [UDD] Request for new field in bugs table: done_date

2017-12-11 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 08:43:09PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 11/12/17 at 10:20 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > for the Debian Med bug squashing advent calendar[1] (may be other > > similar motivations to fix bugs) it would be nice to have a field > > closed_date (or some more sensible name)

Re: [UDD] Request for new field in bugs table: done_date

2017-12-11 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 11/12/17 at 10:20 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > for the Debian Med bug squashing advent calendar[1] (may be other > similar motivations to fix bugs) it would be nice to have a field > closed_date (or some more sensible name) to get the information when a > bug was closed. This could al

Re: [UDD] Request for new field in bugs table: done_date

2017-12-11 Thread Stuart Prescott
Andreas Tille wrote: > for the Debian Med bug squashing advent calendar[1] (may be other > similar motivations to fix bugs) it would be nice to have a field > closed_date (or some more sensible name) to get the information when a > bug was closed. This could also help to get some stats about how l

[UDD] Request for new field in bugs table: done_date

2017-12-11 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, for the Debian Med bug squashing advent calendar[1] (may be other similar motivations to fix bugs) it would be nice to have a field closed_date (or some more sensible name) to get the information when a bug was closed. This could also help to get some stats about how long bugs in Debian were