tp://henning.makholm.net/xcftools/
It fixes two completely unrelated bugs that I ran into mere hours
after releasing 1.0.5. It also changes license terms from GPL2 to
Publid Domain.
Such flurry of activity after 2+ years of stasis ...
Thanks, Jan, for taking hand of this.
--
Henning Makholm
for some time, except that I was (and am) snowed under by
my day job.
--
Henning Makholm "Take a sad song, and make it bitter."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nt purposes, would it be possible to
have the extract_info function in
packages.qa.debian.org/www/bin/common.py recognize the
X-Testing-Watch-Package header as an alternative to the X-PTS-Package
header?
(debian-qa readers: Please cc me)
--
Henning Makholm"De kan rejse hid og did
losed.
--
Henning Makholm "og de står om nissen Teddy Ring."
less.
> 2) Submitting 6229 wishlist bug is not possible/is not the solution
> (without proposing alternatives method)
Now you have a third reply: Explain why people should care, and
someone might actually start caring.
--
Henning Makholm
instead of just lamenting their lack of a telepathic
understanding of your intentions?
--
Henning Makholm"Nu kommer han. Kan du ikke høre knallerten?"
kage immediately,
both due to the lawsuit risk, and out of respect for the authors of
the original GPL code.
--
Henning Makholm"We can hope that this serious deficiency will be
remedied in the final version of BibTeX, 1.0, which is
expected to appear when the LaTeX 3.0 development is completed."
I wish I got more time to do debian things but ...
It seems to me that a lot of the bugs on Wicherts bug list could be fixed
by recompiling or isn't really release critical. Identify these and do
something.
Where something is either recompile, fill short tasks to recompile,
downgrade or make a l
reopen 18337
thanks
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please reopen this. The bugreport mentions four missing manpages, only
> one of which has been written.
Sorry my mistake. Shame on me.
--
I congratulate you. Happy goldfish bowl to you, to me, to everyone,
and may each of you
"J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Check out #45419 as well - lesstifg may need a "Lessdox" symlink in its doc
> directory so that internal references work.
Hmmm, there is a "Lessdox -> html" symlink but no file named html. But
the rules file tries to delete it. I think somethi
Version: 0.89.0
The manpage for xmbind(1) refers to a VirtualBindings(5x)-manpage but
this manpage is non-existing.
There is also some HTML tags, that should be converted to nroff (
-> .B)
--
I congratulate you. Happy goldfish bowl to you, to me, to everyone,
and may each of you fry in hell for
I will apply you patch and forward the bug upstream. The
VirtualBindings(5) doesn't seem to appear on www.lesstif.org, so it's
not just lost in the packaging.
--
I congratulate you. Happy goldfish bowl to you, to me, to everyone,
and may each of you fry in hell forever.
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I suppose I should maintain 9wm...
Does that mean you will look at these bug at least as a QA member?
[ Meaning it would be waste of time if I tried to look at them ]
--
I congratulate you. Happy goldfish bowl to you, to me, to everyone,
and may each o
"J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think I had some more comments, but I have no connection to
> > bugs.debian.org and can not research them. (think I have some local net
> > problems)
>
> Check out #45419 as well - lesstifg may need a "Lessdox" symlink in its doc
> directo
We have 38 outstanding bug maintained by us. and this is just some
random thoughts on them:
#4243, #5409, #6439, #6772 9term and 9wm
These are very old bug (986-1137 days). Somebody should look at these
and try to contact the submitter if he still lives.
I would like to do it but my debianbox is
On http://qa.debian.org/wnpp.html there is a mailto link to the
maintainers of orphaned packages.
Wouldn't it be more useable to have links to the description of the
package or the buglist for the package?
If I want to work on unmaintained packages (without adopting them)
taht kind of links would
16 matches
Mail list logo
