On Mon, Sep 28, 1998 at 06:23:07PM +0200, Francesco Potorti` wrote:
> Package: mozilla
> Version: 19980904-1
> Severity: grave
What version of libc6 are you running? Michael Meskes noted that the problem
may be linked to upgrading to the most recent libc6 in slink.
Ray
--
PATRIOTISM A great Bri
On Fri, Sep 25, 1998 at 04:20:59PM +, Stephen Zander wrote:
> Speaking of mozilla, I see it's currently being maintained by the QA
> group.
Correct. It was orphaned, and I did a build of the latest tarball (as I
think mozilla is an important piece of free software of which Debian should
includ
On Wed, Sep 16, 1998 at 01:56:37AM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Is it getting loaded against the correct libraries (ldd mozilla)?
>
> After I set LD_LIBRARY_PATH like the wrapper script does, I get this, which
> looks ok to me (very scarey, but ok):
Yup. This is sane.
I
Hi Joey,
On Tue, Sep 15, 1998 at 01:57:47AM -, Joey Hess wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>mozilla
> zsh: segmentation fault mozilla
Is it getting loaded against the correct libraries (ldd mozilla)?
> It worked a lot better before it got linked to lesstif... seems that was a
> step backwards.
N
On Sat, Jun 06, 1998 at 11:24:34PM -0700, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
> >>>>> "jdassen" == jdassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> jdassen> Galen introduced the current two-suites situation in hamm
> jdassen> for reasons that I find sound.
On Sat, Jun 06, 1998 at 11:28:20PM -0700, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
> jdassen> More like lack of patience on my part. One patch has been
> jdassen> accepted (the location of the "trampolines" paper).
>
> Where is that now? Is it my dir on master?
The locat
On Fri, May 29, 1998 at 08:09:54PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> Yet earlier, JHM wrote:
> > > egcc 17768 libc6 bug in mathematical functions [114]
> > > (Galen Hazelwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> >
> > Fixing this bug exceeds my capabilities. I have send a message to the
> > egcs-bugs
On Fri, May 29, 1998 at 10:40:09AM -0400, Brian White wrote:
> > > Would it be possible to remove "-force-mem" from the list of
> > > optimizations done by "-O2"?
> >
> > I don't know. I'm not an expert on (e)gcc internals.
>
> My problem is that a lot of people use "-O2" for their compiles. If
On Fri, May 29, 1998 at 09:59:43AM -0400, Brian White wrote:
> > > egcc 17768 libc6 bug in mathematical functions [114]
> > > (Galen Hazelwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> >
> > Fixing this bug exceeds my capabilities. I have send a message to the
> > egcs-bugs list asking them to look i
> egcc 17768 libc6 bug in mathematical functions [114] (Galen
> Hazelwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
Fixing this bug exceeds my capabilities. I have send a message to the
egcs-bugs list asking them to look into the current reports, but have
received no responses.
The bug only occurs wit
On Sun, May 24, 1998 at 12:13:00PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> I've just tried to compile 2.0.7pre1-4, i.e., the current version of libc6
> in hamm, and it crashes in the same way as reported in 22292. We must get
> this sorted out before hamm is released.
I fully agree. There problem is: _how_ are
[Background: I've been one of the people who have done NMUs of Galen's
compiler packages]
On Fri, May 22, 1998 at 03:06:38AM -0400, Brian White wrote:
> egcc 17768 libc6 bug in mathematical functions [106] (Galen
> Hazelwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> gcc 22292 CRITICAL:
On Fri, Jan 30, 1998 at 11:38:16AM -0500, Brian White wrote:
> 14088: lesstifg - xmcd can't dance [99] ([EMAIL PROTECTED] (J.H.M.
> Dassen (Ray)))
> 17575: nedit- nedit: NEdit locks the X display [0] (Erik Andersen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
#17575 is very likely a LessTif bug to
13 matches
Mail list logo
