Bug#694593: qa.debian.org: "news" part doesnt list stable-security uploads when package has been removed from unstable

2012-11-28 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On mer., 2012-11-28 at 18:04 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > On 11/28/2012 05:31 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > >> On Wed, 28 Nov 2012, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > >>> looking at http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mysql-5.1.html we can see > >>> that the source pa

Bug#694593: qa.debian.org: "news" part doesnt list stable-security uploads when package has been removed from unstable

2012-11-28 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On mer., 2012-11-28 at 08:10 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 28 Nov 2012, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > looking at http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mysql-5.1.html we can see > > that the source package has been removed from unstable and testing, but > >

Bug#694593: qa.debian.org: "news" part doesnt list stable-security uploads when package has been removed from unstable

2012-11-27 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
t. It'd be nice to continue providing new information until the package is completely removed from Debian. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stabl

Re: UDD unreachable from alioth

2011-05-18 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
time. I've reissued the cert and both look ok > now. Confirmed, seems to work fine, thanks for your help. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: UDD unreachable from alioth

2011-05-18 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On mer., 2011-05-18 at 09:21 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 18/05/11 at 08:14 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > Hey, > > > > I asked yesterday on #alioth and #debian-qa but got no answer besides > > “udd works on quantz”. > > > > I'm not sure

UDD unreachable from alioth

2011-05-17 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
expectedly This probably means the server terminated abnormally before or while processing the request. (same thing with PG 8.4 and python). Is it expected, and could someone (wether from -qa or from alioth team) take a look? Thanks in advance, and regards, -- Yves-Alexis NB: plea

Bug#457169: patch for qa.debian.org

2007-12-21 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
Package: qa.debian.org Followup-For: Bug #457169 The simple patch attached fixes the problem on high dpi displays and looks good on a 96 dpi one. I guess removing all fonts: ##pt (and maybe replace them with a px one) would help but I don't know enough css/designing. Cheers, -- Yves-A

Bug#457169: dpi

2007-12-20 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
The thing is, the font size _has_ changed since the other css. Maybe not for everybody, or not for people at 96 dpi, but it has. Cheers, -- Yves-Alexis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#457169: qa.debian.org: fonts too large with high dpi display

2007-12-20 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 09:39:00AM +, Yves-Alexis wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: normal oops, sorry for the wrong email address. -- Yves-Alexis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#457169: qa.debian.org: fonts too large with high dpi display

2007-12-20 Thread Yves-Alexis
ont size, but I have to redo that at each time, and the previous css didn't show this behavior. Besides that, I really like this new css :) Thanks for the work, -- Yves-Alexis Perez -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Arch