Re: criteria for acceptable languages for central QA tools in Debian (was: Re: coordination between lintian/piuparts/adequate)

2024-12-18 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Hi, On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 11:57:14PM +0100, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote: > [forking to -devel] > > On Wed Dec 11, 2024 at 11:15 AM CET, Holger Levsen wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 09:38:57PM +0100, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote: > > > > On Sat Dec 7, 2024 at 5:15 AM CET, Paul Wis

Re: Debian Trends updated

2021-04-20 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 02:03:47PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > [ M-F-T set to -qa@ ] > > Hi, > > I just updated Debian Trends: https://trends.debian.net/ > > I wonder if we should use the start of the next release cycle to decide > that we no longer want to accept some packaging practices, su

Re: [PATCH] jenkins.debian.net: Fix architecture check

2014-03-12 Thread Wouter Verhelst
; then: if [ $(dh_listpackages | wc -l) -eq 0 ]; then <...error out...> fi dh_listpackages will list the packages that debhelper "will act upon" on this architecture. If the architecture wildcard for a package doesn't match our architecture, then the package isn't listed. &

[PATCH] jenkins.debian.net: Fix architecture check

2014-02-24 Thread Wouter Verhelst
d-i_build.sh checks the architecture by parsing a hardcoded list of architecture wildcards. It misses the wildcards of the form -any and any-, however, which have been supported since a fair while now. This has caused jenkins to (incorrectly) skip the builds for partman-nbd up until partman-nbd 0.

Re: Changelog not signed by "human"

2007-03-16 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:27:04AM -0700, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: > Hello, > > On updating my system today I obtained a version of "screen" which > was a binary-only upload which contained the following changelog > entry: > > screen (4.0.3-0.3+b1) unstable; urgency=low > > * Bi

Re: Should we remove raidtools?

2004-06-14 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 03:36:07PM +0200, Kars de Jong wrote: > On Thu, 2004-06-10 at 22:36, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > My VME box doesn't boot 2.4, no. Of course, woody supports three types > > of VME machines, and I only have one of them; but I don't think it&

Re: Should we remove raidtools?

2004-06-10 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 10:24:41PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 03:37:42PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > AFAIK we won't be able to kick off 2.2 for sarge. IIRC 2.2 will > > probably be necessary for some m68k- and sparc-variants. I added > > debian-kernel, perhaps

Looking for Yoshiaki Yanagihara

2002-09-21 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Hi guys, It looks to me as though this guy is MIA. The last time his LDAP-record had been modified was on May 14, 2002, when he uploaded a package. He's had a number of outstanding bugs since then, most of which have been fixed in NMUs; he's had NMU's of all his packages (at least te ones in main)

Bug#121697: gcc-m68k-linux (was Bug#121697: mpg123: Man page in /usr/man, not /usr/share/man)

2001-11-29 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 01:21:42PM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 04:37:50AM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > > > mpg123 is one of the only five man pages left in /usr/man ... > > > > what are the others? > > If somebody could

Bug#121697: gcc-m68k-linux (was Bug#121697: mpg123: Man page in /usr/man, not /usr/share/man)

2001-11-29 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Jordi Mallach wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 09:55:08AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I'd heard back nothing about adopting the package. Unless anyone's > > stated needing the package, I'd be happy with it being removed. Once > > finals are over, I'll be looking at the

Bug#115241: Log for failed build of kdessh_4:2.2.1-1.1 (dist=unstable) (fwd)

2001-10-11 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Package: kdessh Version: 4:2.2.1-1.1 Severity: serious This package failed to build, due to some missing execute-permissions on the configure-script: Automatic build of kdessh_4:2.2.1-1.1 on arrakis by sbuild/m68k 1.159 Build started at 20011011-1432 **

Bug#114246: kdegraphics: failed to build on m68k

2001-10-02 Thread Wouter Verhelst
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: kdegraphics Version: 4:2.2.1-1 Severity: serious Looks like a typo to me. From the build log: Automatic build of kdegraphics_4:2.2.1-1 on arrakis by sbuild/m68k 1.159 Build started at 20011002-2237 ***