Re: snacc status?

2004-08-08 Thread W. Borgert
On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 02:05:27AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > On July 5, W. Borgert offered to try and fix the RC bug for snacc. > Has progress been made? I have some experience with the auto* tools, > and perhaps I would be able to fix the problem, but I don't wan

Re: Removing snacc?

2004-07-16 Thread W. Borgert
On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 06:40:12PM +0200, W. Borgert wrote: > Proposal: I try to fix the RC bug #249740 (but not necessarily the > 'normal' one #202593) in the next days or so and do an NMU. Just an 'excuse' mail: Real life eats my time, so I cannot do anything b

Re: Removing snacc?

2004-07-05 Thread W. Borgert
Quoting Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Unfortunately, devel-protocols and ethereal-dev depend on snacc. Can > those dependencies be removed? I can only say, that snacc is used by some people and Debian is currently the only system with a working snacc option. OTOH, without an active ma