purpose in mind? I would like to see [EMAIL PROTECTED] being
> unsubscribed from this list immediately from this newsletter by the same
> person who subscribed it.
It was just spam at large.
I got the same emails 7 times (2 though the debian lists and 5 at
personnal/corporate email addres
On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 21:19:36 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > upstream source. I don't know if we should upload it to frozen or if we
> > should remove xfce from potato and only upload the new version to woody as
> > suggested in the bub repo
there still no fix for them on monday, I'll consider NMUing...
Cordialement,
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROTECTED],pipo}.com,{debian,openhardware}.org} -
- Debian/GNU Linux: GNOME : -
- http://www.fr.debian.org
Package: ftp.debian.org
Version: potato
The following packages have been orphaned for a looong time. Please move
them in the project/orphaned/ section.
- mandelspawn
- 9term
- 9fonts
- cgi-scripts
- dvi2tty
- xldlas
Cordialement,
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROTECTED],pipo}.com
rough a bug report on
ftp.debian.org the removal of a package from the distribution (as long as
the given reason is good of course).
But of course, it's always better to talk about it with the package
maintainer before... ;)
Cordialement,
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
go in
the non-free section.
Cordialement,
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROTECTED],pipo}.com,{debian,openhardware}.org} -
- Debian/GNU Linux: http://www.openhardware.orgLogiciels du soleil: -
- http://www.fr.debian.o
On Sun, 7 Feb 1999, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I would be prepared to adopt fvwm2 if no-one else is and it's not too
> complex. It's clearly an important package and shouldn't remain
> orphaned.
It's now yours. ;)
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROTECTED],pipo}.
e something about wu-ftpd too, but
>that might not have been the -academic package)
Indeed, this one is now fixed.
> 7042 mhonarcThere is no changelog.Debian.g Michael Alan Dorman
Michael just told he's working on it, and he already did several uploads,
so...
> 7124 c
must _not_ be documented; they
must be _fixed_! (We are Debian, not Microsoft ;).
Also, you install once (usually takes no more than 1 hour) and you keep
your running system for a much longer while.
Not that bugs in the install shouldn't be fixed (fixed, not documented! ;)
of course...
still think it'd be good to have a -qa homepage somewhere to keep track
> of where we're up to on things like this, too.
At the very least, use this list to follow the ongoing work; but having a
summary on a www page somewhere may help too.
Cordialement,
--
- Vince
t; 1. Why the package was dropped.
because nobody was interested into maintaining it anymore.
> 2. Whether the package can go back in the prospective packages list.
Yes. (but it would have to be uploaded in the non-free section due to a
licence problem)
Cordialement,
--
- Vincent R
tainer: Vincent Renardias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
byacc - The Berkeley LALR parser generator
Changes:
byacc (1.9-11.6) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Patch by <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to remove some
superfluous files that can interfere with the build process on other
Package: pari
Version: 1.39.03-7
Version 2 is out:
http://hasse.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/ntsw/pari/Welcome.html
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROTECTED],pipo.com,debian.org} -
- Debian/GNU Linux: Pipo:WAW: -
- http://www.fr.debian.org
On Sun, 2 Nov 1997, Christian Schwarz wrote:
> Should we drop ancient/orphaned packages from our "distribution"
> and move them to some other directory in the archive?
Yes.
It has been discusses a while ago...
> However, there is long list of unmaintained packages:
>
>ancient packages
On 5 Oct 1997, James LewisMoss wrote:
> According to the prospective packages page these packages need a new
> maintainer, and according to dpkg --status this email is claiming
> maintainership for this (libdnd1) package currently.
Right, I used to maintain those packages, but I orphaned them a
15 matches
Mail list logo
