Re: Obsoleting the old PTS?

On Thu, June 7, 2018 04:54, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:05 PM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > >> We can try to eliminate all those old links, but isn't it about time the >> old PTS is just retired and turned into a redirect to the new tracker >> which has

Obsoleting the old PTS?

Hi all, Regularly during Debian work I end up in the old PTS at packages.qa.debian.org, because various places link to that instead of the "new", much better tracker. We can try to eliminate all those old links, but isn't it about time the old PTS is just retired and turned into a redirect to the

Bug#762109: tracker.debian.org: could use changelog parser to pretty print debian changelogs

On Fri, September 19, 2014 11:16, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:46:31AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: >> In any case, Distro Tracker is 100% Python and I don't see us relying on >> libparse-debianchangelog-perl to generate pretty changelogs. So this >> wishlist is likely to

Bug#762109: tracker.debian.org: could use changelog parser to pretty print debian changelogs

Package: tracker.debian.org Severity: wishlist Hi, The changelogs are currently displayed in plain text format. Tools like libparse-debianchangelog-perl can pretty print those to HTML so they have nice headings, clickable bug numbers, etc. Cheers, Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-r

Bug#761730: tracker.d.o: please provide links to https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/$PKG

On Tue, September 16, 2014 09:10, Paul Wise wrote: > Could we get a new URL that also has information about unimportant and > resolved issues and DSAs? I would suggest a format like what lintian > uses: Not sure what you'd use that additional info for, but I would heartily disrecommend to display

Bug#759486: creates invalid browse link when no vcs-browser field defined

Package: tracker.debian.org Severity: minor Hi, When a package has a Vcs-something field but not a Vcs-Browser field, the tracker does display a browse link but with an empty href: https://svn.non-gnu.uvt.nl/uvt-dev/trunk/package/modmellon/";>Subversion (Browse) This can at the time of writi

Bug#754694: "A new upstream version is available" not up to date

Package: tracker.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/gnupg reports an action item "A new upstream version is available: 1.4.18". > Severity: high > Created: 2014-07-13 > Last Updated: 2014-07-13 > A new upstream version 1.4.18 is available, you should > consider packag

Bug#754693: RFH action claims that package is not in unstable

Package: tracker.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/gnupg lists an action item called "RFH". Clicking the "?" behind it gives the text: > Severity: normal > Created: 2014-07-02 > Last Updated: 2014-07-02 > The WNPP database contains an RFH (Request For Help) entry for

Re: Hijacking^W^W^W^W^W^WSalvaging packages for fun and profit: A proposal

Hi Arno, Thanks for this initiative. It seems like a useful guideline. > * A previous NMU was not acknowledged, and at least another issue > justifying another NMU is pending for /one month/ [5]. I was wondering what 'acknowledging an NMU' means nowadays. Of course, we all used this term from th

Bug#647708: qa.debian.org: madison.php missing lenny suite

On Tue, January 10, 2012 14:12, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 30/12/11 at 08:41 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: >> Hi, >> >> > > It seems that the madison.php [0] interface is currently lacking >> > > information about the lenny suite. However, it seems that

Bug#647708: qa.debian.org: madison.php missing lenny suite

Hi, > > It seems that the madison.php [0] interface is currently lacking > > information about the lenny suite. However, it seems that > > lenny-security is still included. > AFAIK madison.php is symlinked or redirected to use UDD [1], and UDD\ > has dropped the data about etch and lenny recentl

Re: pilot-qof & dpkg-cross reports in PTS

Hi Neil, On sneon 15 Maaie 2010, Neil Williams wrote: > I find it confusing that either CVE is still listed in the security > tracker at all. > > When a CVE bug is closed as invalid or illogical, why isn't the CVE > also deleted or removed? Leaving it as "vulnerable but unimportant" is > erroneou

Bug#577746: debcheck: not updated since 12 Feb 2010

Package: qa.debian.org User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: debcheck Hi, The pages at http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php have not been updated anymore since two months now, as the footer shows. Thijs signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#548602: PTS: typo: "introduces news bugs"

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: minor Hi, The PTS page for gnupg displays this as TODO: # Updating gnupg introduces news bugs: #546552, #545275. Which has a typo in "news". cheers, Thijs signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#508445: debcheck: produces output on any package due to m68k

Package: qa.debian.org Hi, The debcheck webpages now produce output on any package, with lines like these: Package declares a build time dependency on docbook which cannot be satisfied on m68k. Package apt-file does not exist on m68k. Package declares a build time dependency on liblist-moreutils

Bug#497058: PTS: mismatch in number of bugs tagged help

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: minor User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org Usertags: pts Hi, The page http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gnupg.html displays that 3 bugs are tagged with help, while clicking the link shows just two. This mismatch stems from the fact that one of the bugs is merged with an

RM: newsgate -- RoQA; insecure, unstable, orphaned, limited archs, free alternatives, low popcon

Package: ftp.debian.org Hi, Please remove newsgate from unstable, as result of the combination of the following factors: * It's riddled with insecure tempfile usage; * As the documentation indicates the software is quite unfinished; * Most recent upstream release 1996; * Package has been up for

RM: cdcontrol -- RoQA; RC-buggy, security issues, unmaintained, low popcon

Package: ftp.debian.org Hi, Please remove cdcontrol from unstable, for the following reasons: * It has an RC security bug about insecure tempfile usage. * It is unmaintained, last MU four years ago. Maintainer seems MIA and is also upstream. * It has few popcon votes. thanks, Thijs pgpNr6q

Bug#493189: PTS: please display testing security updates aswell

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org Usertags: pts Hi, The PTS currently displays stable and stable security updates in the left column. I think it would be worthwhile to include testing security updates aswell if available. thanks, Thijs pgpIlkiANUTP1.

Bug#488751: Patch

On Monday 21 July 2008 13:48, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > I guess this part doesn't really belong to the patch, right? Right, of course. Thanks for noticing. cheers, Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#488751: Patch

On Saturday 19 July 2008 17:22, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > I believe the following patch should fix this issue, but my PHP > is somewhat rusty... > > Index: developer.wml > === > --- developer.wml (Revision 1915) > +++ developer.wm

Bug#490806: PTS: spurious standards-version messages for udebs

Index: pts.xsl === --- pts.xsl (revision 1914) +++ pts.xsl (working copy) @@ -899,7 +899,7 @@ The package is of priority standard or higher, you should really find some co-maintainers. - + The package

Bug#490806: PTS: spurious standards-version messages for udebs

Package: qa.debian.org User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org Usertags: pts Tags: patch Hi, For a µdeb package, the PTS displays spurious warnings about standards-version: http://packages.qa.debian.org/n/network-console.html µdebs don't contain a standards-version header. The attached patch fixes thos

Re: potion: Sponsor this NMU to fix bashism

On Friday 11 July 2008 20:01, Marco Rodrigues wrote: > Hi! Please sponsor this NMU to fix bashism in potion package. > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=477615 > > The debdiff is attached to the bug report. Thanks, uploaded to DELAYED/4. Thijs pgpGunCj2JoV1.pgp Description: PG

Re: Please sponsor roxterm NMU to fix bashism

On Monday 23 June 2008 16:42, Marco Rodrigues wrote: > Could someone sponsor this NMU? > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=484434 > > The debdiff is attached to the bug report. I've taken a look at it but you've seemed to have missed a bashism in the clean target. There also see

Bug#486315: PTS: resets bug counts

Package: qa.debian.org The bug counts for all packages in the PTS seem to be all-zeroes. My first explanation for this is the current outage of a number of Debian machines. However, I think it would be better if the PTS did not trash the old information it has before it knows it downloaded new fre

RM: smtpd; RoQA, buggy, unmaintained, alternatives exist

Package: ftp.debian.org Hi, Let's remove "smtpd": * Last maintainer upload over 3.5 years ago. * Since then three unacknowledged NMU's happened. * It is currently RC buggy without maintainer response yet. * There are many alternatives for spam filtering email servers. cheers, Thijs -- To UN

Bug#486263: PTS: dead link debian-ports.org

Package: qa.debian.org The PTS has under "Other Links" -> "Buildd" a link to something labeled "ports" linking to debian-ports.org which gives a 404. Even if it would work the label is unclear to me as to the best of my knowledge any non-i386 arch of Debian is a port. cheers, Thijs -- To U

Bug#483179: reopen 483179, PTS: please do *not* link to Ubuntu Launchpad bugs page

On Fri, June 13, 2008 13:33, Ana Guerrero wrote: > I do care about what happens in whatever part of Debian on my packages, > but not at what happens in derivated distros. No-one forces you to use it. If you don't find that box useful, disregard it. I hardly find the debcheck info useful, so I igno

removing transitional packages

Hi all, I recently stubled over an transitional package in etch that was still in lenny. I could have filed a bug but wondered if there was any structural "scan" being done on packages marked as "transitional" or "dummy" in etch and still present in Lenny. If not, maybe someone is interested in

Re: [PATCH] Fix XSS vulnerabilites in madison.php

Hi Chris, On Monday 12 May 2008 14:28, Chris Lamb wrote: > I have attached a patch that fixes some cross-site scripting vulnerabilites > in http://qa.debian.org/madison.php. Good work. Since the page is in UTF-8, it's better to use htmlspecialchars() than htmlentities(), because the latter tends

Re: Debian upload monitor

Hi Enrico, On Thursday 1 May 2008 17:19, Enrico Zini wrote: > I've put together a little script that allow to monitor all uploads > performed with a GPG key.  You can find the result at > http://merkel.debian.org/~enrico/keylog/ Doesn't dak already send you an email when it processes an upload wi

Re: Bug#466539: gnome-peercast: CVE-2007-6454 heap-based buffer overflow possibly leading to code execution

On Tuesday 19 February 2008 19:39, Romain Beauxis wrote: > Le Tuesday 19 February 2008 14:08:46 Thijs Kinkhorst, vous avez écrit : > > > As a side note, I've already done a lot of things to try to fix this, > > > but upstream seems not to care at all, and didn't ma

Bug#466515: PTS: "you should include ."

On Tuesday 19 February 2008 14:29, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > Perhaps "The Bug Tracking System contains patches fixing 3 bugs, you > should consider including or untagging them." then? Two additional > words. :) Patch updated :-) Thijs Index: pts/www/xsl/pts.xsl

Bug#466515: PTS: "you should include ."

On Tuesday 19 February 2008 11:55, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > On ti, 2008-02-19 at 11:23 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > > And as this isn't always right, I suggest to use a less strong wording. > > "You should look at.." or "You could include". Or whatever. But _all_ > > those patches should definitly

Re: Bug#466539: gnome-peercast: CVE-2007-6454 heap-based buffer overflow possibly leading to code execution

On Tuesday 19 February 2008 13:57, Romain Beauxis wrote: > Package: gnome-peercast > Version: 0.5.4-1.1 > Severity: grave > Tags: security > Justification: user security hole > > > Hi ! > > CVE-2007-6454 as been fixed for peercast, but since this package > includes a static version of the c

Bug#466515: PTS: "you should include ."

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: minor Tags: patch Hi, When a package has one 'patched' bug, the PTS now displays: > The Bug Tracking System contains patches fixing 1 bug, you should include . as seen e.g. here: http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/sword.html Attached patch restores the word "it", th

Re: RFS: workbone - QA Upload with RC bugfix

On Sunday 3 February 2008 17:04, Barry deFreese wrote: > I've made a QA upload for workbone that closes the RC bug if someone > could review/upload I would appreciate it. > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/workbone/workbone_2.40-8.dsc Thanks - I'm building this now and will upload it

Re: New lintian pages available for testing

On Thu, January 3, 2008 10:00, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > That would mean that it gets harder to get one or the other version of > the page: it's no longer enough to just go to the page, you also have to go > click on something else as well. For something that is a simple report > page, I don't think

Re: New lintian pages available for testing

Hi Russ, On Thursday 3 January 2008 01:16, Russ Allbery wrote: > http://lintian.debian.org/reports-testing/ This looks good in general, it's a clear improvement over what we have. > * The HTML pages are now templatized (using Text::Template). The core of > many of the pages is still gener

Bug#302575: PTS: add link to popcon

On Thursday 20 December 2007 13:54, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote: > > Reading the text above, I see the PTS not display any counts or > > percentages related to popcon. How do you think this request has been > > addressed? > > OK.  From the bug text, it looked like the request was to change "just a

Bug#302575: PTS: add link to popcon

On Thursday 20 December 2007 11:53, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote: > > You could consider turning the link into something a little bit more > > informative (i.e.: "Popcon: n (p%)", n being the installed number, p > > percentage), and one can click the link to get all the details they want > > about v

Bug#456294: PTS: please make svnbuildstat link conditional

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: pts Hi, The PTS has a link to svnbuildstat for every package now, which is quite useful for the listed packages. However, the link does not provide useful information for non-svnbuildstat-listed packages. The vast majorit

Bug#264145: ddpo: please make bug-severity grouping more configurable

On Tuesday 11 December 2007 11:27, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > In particular, please consider moving wontfix bugs away. If the > maintainers are aware and haev a good reason to not fix that, they > must either be considered closed (maybe not good), or, better, be in a > separate column. To add even mor

Re: URL convention to point to per-package lintian checks

On Mon, December 3, 2007 08:48, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > My main problem with the current naming scheme is that it is also open > to clashes. If two maintainer names are different only for an accented > letter they would clash into the very same page. Clashes are already there, even without acc

Re: handling MIA co-maitainers?

On Mon, October 22, 2007 22:50, Ana Guerrero wrote: > So to get him removed from the uploaders file of those packages, what is > the way to go? I only can think in filing a wishlist bug against the > package, but maybe there is a better way to handle this. If you've contacted his co-maintainers, a

Bug#441283: qa.debian.org: "Debian Developer's Packages Overview" includes bug reporters.

On Sat, September 8, 2007 09:45, A. Costa wrote: > ...the page says I'm a Debian Developer, which isn't so. (I report > bugs and have at times posted on a few Debian mailing lists, but never > pursued the DD thing.) > > Presumably whatever 'bot created the page must have mined the mailing > list o

Re: Suggesstion to remove lxdoom

On Tuesday 7 August 2007 01:24, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > I've seen that lxdoom has been orphaned. It can be safely removed: > While lxdoom is completely dead upstream, we have a cleaned-up > fork of lxdoom in the archive, which is actively maintained: prboom. Is it a drop in replacement? Then w

Re: Bug#435743: qa.debian.org: Link for NEW packages returns 404

On Monday 6 August 2007 05:12, Anthony Towns wrote: > > Anthony, would it be possible to generate that page when a new package > > enters the queue? > > In theory, but not in practice right atm. Has there been any public > discussion about these pages actually being useful? I'm still fairly > nervo

Bug#269493:

On Sunday 5 August 2007 15:06, Bluefuture wrote: > Dehs data is fully updated now with new debian version conversion > function. > Please check result now and see if we can close this bug. For the package I reported this for I can't check, because the watchfile is outdated at the moment and I hav

Bug#269493:

On Friday 3 August 2007 16:48, Bluefuture wrote: > This is actually the convertion function with regular expression: > > function vers_conv($debvers) { > preg_match("/(.+:)?([^-]+)(ds|dsfg|debian)/",$debvers,$matches); I would change "dsfg" to "dfsg" :-) But for the rest... I've just reimpl

Bug#269493:

On Tuesday 31 July 2007 01:45, Bluefuture wrote: > We need to have more statistical data about debian and upstream strange > version numbering to do a better comparison. For example there is no > standard way to cvs and svn version naming in debian. Still, a part of the bug here could still be add

Bug#435743: qa.debian.org: Link for NEW packages returns 404

On Friday 3 August 2007 00:22, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: normal > > I recently uploaded the xl2tpd package, which went into NEW. On my QA > page [0], it gives a link [1] that returns a 404 error. This link is now there. I guess the problem is that that page is

Bug#435794: packages.qa.debian.org: please add reverse depends

On Friday 3 August 2007 10:30, Adriaan Peeters wrote: > It would be nice to be able to check reverse depends without an up to > date distribution installation. So please add reverse depends to the > packages.qa.d.o and/or packages.d.o sites. I've been thinking about this before and I definately th

Bug#356042:

On Tuesday 31 July 2007 01:33, Stefano Fabri wrote: > Please could you verify if this bug is still valid? > > It seems fixed.. so we will close it. Hi Stefano, Please note that you sent a message to the bugs but appearently not to the submitters of the bugs, so they will not get notification aut

Bug#433095: DDPO: does not show all my sponsored packages

reopen 433095 thanks On Wednesday 18 July 2007 00:29, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > The last run happened 6 weeks ago: > https://rt.debian.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=102 > > Thijs, did you create your subkey recently ? No, but my (current) key was only added to the Debian keyring on the 18th of June.

Bug#433095: DDPO: does not show all my sponsored packages

Package: qa.debian.org User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org Usertags: ddpo Hi, My DDPO does not show all packages I sponsored. Last week I sponsored the following packages: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?packages=bcm5700-source http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?packages=ampache http://qa.debia

Bug#432038: qa.debian.org: DDPO HTML does not validate

tags 432038 patch thanks Hi, On Saturday 7 July 2007 00:13, Felix C. Stegerman wrote: > Visting http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED], > I saw a "Valid HTML 4.0!" image and [on impulse] clicked on it. To my > surprise, the page did not validate! Here's a patch that fixes this, against current

Re: Some ideas from the 'Supporting 15.000 packages' BoF

On Thu, June 28, 2007 13:48, Michael Stone wrote: >> Once we've released a package in stable and as 'supported', we will >> support it until the end of that stable's life. I would not want to >> retract the supportedness of a package during stable's lifetime; our >> users should be able to use stab

Re: Some ideas from the "Supporting 15.000 packages" BoF

On Tuesday 26 June 2007 01:07, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > Here's the ideas that I have heard (and written) during the "Supporting > 15.000 packages" BoF which happened during DebConf7. Good that there's discussion about this issue. > * Have a new release policy of not releasing orphaned packages in

Let's remove ibwebadmin

Hi all, I propose to remove ibwebadmin for the following reasons: * Last maintainer upload Sep 2004; * Orphaned since Jul 2005 with no interest in taking over; * New upstream versions available since 2005 with no recorded requests to update the package; * Has a release critical bug (affected by

Let's remove libapache-mod-gzip

reassign 401682 ftp.debian.org retitle 401682 RM: libapache-mod-gzip -- RoQA; Apache 1 only, orphaned thanks Hi all, Let's remove libapache-mod-gzip: - Supports Apache 1 only, which is about to be removed (see #418266). - Apache2 has this functionality built-in (mod_deflate). - Orphaned for 5 mon

Bug#420005: purple coloured version does not match description

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: minor Hi, Looking at: http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] I see the 0.41-9 of wakeonlan, both in testing and unstable, being purple. The description of purple in the Help section says: Purple: testing version differs from unstable version S

Re: Can we orphan dlocate?

On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 08:12 +0200, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 11:45:58PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > The maintainer appears to have lost interest in the package (last upload > > 1999). > > It's also his only package; he is probably MIA. (I seem to remember him > > b

Re: [RFC/RFH] Post-etch archive cleanup: let's work on something organized!

On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 11:24 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Any comments/suggestions on the proposed workflow ? Thanks for adding me, I've already started on some packages I was involved in earlier (e.g. via NMU's). I'm using "MAINTAINER_PINGED" for those where I've contacted the maintainer for mor

Re: Bug#412635: marked as done (qa.debian.org: PTS could show removal requests based on bugs against ftp.debian.org)

On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 19:12 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > The format - amongst other potentially useful removal related stuff - > is > documented in http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals (if there's > anything that's missing, feel free to prod me...) May I

Bug#412635: qa.debian.org: PTS could show removal requests based on bugs against ftp.debian.org

Hi, On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 22:03 -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > The Package Tracking System could show removal requests for a package, > based on bug reports against ftp.debian.org. It already does: http://packages.qa.debian.org/v/vimacs.html http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/satutils.html http://pa

Re: Procedure to take over a package.

On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 17:18 -0200, Carlos Laviola wrote: > I believe you are not capable of maintaining it and would kindly > ask you to sod off. By using this kind of conversation on someone who is trying to help but made an honest mistake, I think you might be disqualifying yourself even more as

Bug#406847: DDPO: link to p-u-new is stale

Package: qa.debian.org Hi, On my DDPO, http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=thijs, the package 'mantis' is listed under Pending uploads with the following versions under stable: 0.19.2-5sarge4.1 p-u-new: 0.19.2-5sarge2.1 When I click the link that p-u-new is, there's no such package listed.

Re: Can ccc, cfal, libots and friends be removed?

On Sat, 2007-01-13 at 03:58 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > They are "just" downloaders&installers in contrib for RPM's targetted at > > alpha. Some of the download URL's are broken, all of the open bugs are > > about gettext translations, there's many lintian errors for each, > > there's next to

Bug#406615: PTS: Please do not use experimental changelog

Package: qa.debian.org Hi, On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 11:15 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > I was looking at the master changelog on packages.qa.debian.org. It's > annoying that it doesn't track experimental and unstable separately. I've been annoyed at this before and your message prompted me

Can ccc, cfal, libots and friends be removed?

Hi, In November, the following packages have been orphaned: ccc Compaq C Compiler for Linux Alpha cfalCompaq Fortran Compiler for Linux Alpha cfalrtl Compaq Fortran Run-Time Library (installer) cpmlCompaq Portable Math Library (installer) cxmlCompaq Extended Math Library (installe

Re: Piuparts testing status update

Hello Lucas, Thank you for your work. On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 18:44 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Here is a list of packages that fail when all packages except essential > ones, apt and debfoster were removed, but didn't fail when debconf and > ucf were kept. This indicates a missing dependency on

Re: XS-Vcs-field

On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 14:02 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > I suggest that we specify tow headers: and SCM specific > header, XS-Vcs- where name is one keyword from a specified list > (bzr, cvs, svn, darcs, git, hf, or arch), and XS-VCS-Browse, which is > a plain old HTTP URL. Yes, thi

Bug#398192: PTS: does not show security uploads anymore under news

Package: qa.debian.org Hi, The "Latest News" section of the PTS shows all uploads for the package. It used to show uploads to stable-security in the past, but these are not present anymore. See e.g.: http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/phpmyadmin.html It features security uploads in 2005, but the m

Re: Help with updating nco package?

On Sat, 2006-11-11 at 13:26 -0800, Charlie Zender wrote: > Damyan Ivanov wrote: > > nco is currently maintained by Debian QA Group. Are you willing to take > > over? If so, you should tell them. > > Yes, I would like to take over nco maintainance, if it's OK with them. > I'm not a debian developer

Re: Can vaiostat be removed?

reassign 321693 ftp.debian.org retitle 321693 RM: vaiostat -- RoM; RC-buggy, no maintainer, inactive upstream thanks On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 05:26 +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > No skin off my nose. Feel free. Ok, doing so (and labeling RoM seems appropriate). thanks, Thijs signature.asc Descrip

Can vaiostat be removed?

Hi all, The vaiostat package: * Is not in testing; * Is RC-buggy; * Has been up for adoption for well over a year; * Is inactive upstream. Since the RFA has had no takers and the package is not in Etch, I think it might be better to remove it rather than keep it in sid. Opinions, especially from

Re: Can raccess be removed?

clone 392421 -1 reassign -1 ftp.debian.org severity -1 normal retitle -1 RM: raccess -- RoQA; obsolete, RC-buggy, dead upstream thanks! On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 18:09 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > I think that 'raccess' might better be removed from Debian, for the > following reas

Can raccess be removed?

Hi, I think that 'raccess' might better be removed from Debian, for the following reasons: * It's a vulnerability scanner, but the last upstream version is 4.5 years old; that makes me doubtful about it's use; * It has an RC bug filed against it; * The description tells me that it's still devel

Can binutils-h8300-hms be removed?

Hi, I propose binutils-h8300-hms to be removed, for the following reasons: * Orphaned for two monts without any sign of interest; * Has an RC bug (non-free docs); * Last MU four years (!) ago; * Very few users in popcon (4 votes). Thijs signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed m

Re: Rebuilding all etch packages inside etch, round 2

On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 11:41 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > Actually, in a test it *might* be ok. Usually, even if they're bugs, > they're not RC. > > Access to a debian-mirror is necessary for some packages, but rather > on a exception-basis - almost all packages need to build with the > packages t

Re: Rebuilding all etch packages inside etch, round 2

On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 11:16 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Internet access was not available from the nodes. Are build scripts > allowed to download files from the Internet during build ? Some perl > modules do this in their tests. No, this is definately a bug. I've indeed encountered it a couple

Bug#393462: PTS: please make VCS link also point to browsable copy

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist Hi, The latest addition to the PTS, showing VCS repositories for packages, is a great addition. However, I'd like it even better if there was also a link to a web browsable copy of the repository. There's currently also a link to the upstream website of

Re: Remove xawtv?

On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 14:51 +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote: > Well, at first I (personally) would tag the bug nonreproducible, > because a) it works for me and b) I agree with the other comments in > the report which relate this behaviour to a non-working DRI-config. > I belive to remember da

Re: Remove xawtv?

On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 11:39 +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote: > Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Good alternatives available (tvtime, kdetv). > > I propose to remove xawtv. > > Please don't. I cannot see a good alternative to fbtv

Remove xawtv?

Hello, The state of xawtv is not impressive: * Last maintainer upload 2 years ago, orphaned for well over a year; * No interest shown in adoption; * RC bug (does not work), many other bugs; * Upstream also seems dead; * Good alternatives available (tvtime, kdetv). I propose to remove xawtv. Th

Re: ndtpd: Better remove?

On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 15:48 +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Sound like a removal candidate. Are there any packages in Debian that > offer similar functionality? The maintainer has returned and indicated in the buglog that this is now part of another package and is waiting in NEW. So doesn't need to

Re: Let's remove odontolinux

clone 378634 -1 severity -1 normal retitle -1 RM: odontolinux -- RoQA, RC-buggy, no users, maintainer MIA, dead upstream reassign -1 ftp.debian.org thanks On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 10:04 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > So lets remove it. I'll drop the med-dent package from Debian-Med > that depends on

Re: ndtpd: Better remove?

On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 15:48 +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Sound like a removal candidate. Are there any packages in Debian that > offer similar functionality? Not really, but there's two clients for the same protocol in Debian which have even lower popcon numbers. A websearch for the implemented

Let's remove odontolinux

Hello all, > even pulling in the postgresql-client build-dep does not help much (the > database handling is quite hacky, for example it always assumes postgres > to run on localhost etc. etc.). The package should be updated to use > something like `dbconfig-common' for setting up its database. o

ndtpd: Better remove?

Hello, > > The postrm script cannot rely on sysklogd to be available when > > purging. > I took a look at the bug and preinst, and got the feeling > that there's too much mucking around with this syslog stuff. I've taken a look at this package and I think removal might be preferable over fixin

Re: Bug#391359: general: packages.debian.org package view could have a link to see the source changelog.

reassign 391359 www.debian.org thanks On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 12:14 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > packages.debian.org bugs don't belong to "general". Reassigning. Thanks for your work, but the right pseudo-package is www.debian.org. Thijs signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Bug#388040: qa.debian.org: HTML/Client side script injections (XSS) in "advanced [PTS] subscription" script

Hello Moritz, Thanks for your report. > The following URLs demonstrate that it is possible to inject client side > script (such as Javascript) and HTML tags into the HTML form (1) and error > message (2) output generated by the "advanced [PTS] subscription" script. The PTS does not have a secur

Can fidogate be removed?

Hello all, fidogate: * Has had a security issue reported; * Has a number of policy violations; * Has been orphaned for two months; * Has 4 popcon installs with 1 vote; * Is a couple of versions behind upstream; * Is a gateway for Fidonet, does that even exist anymore nowadays? In my opinion, we'd

Re: RM: ud -- RoQA; orphaned, no upstream, uptimed is better

On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 10:44 +0200, Matej Vela wrote: > * Orphaned for 6 months. > * Upstream URL no longer works: > > * uptimed does the same thing better. > * popcon: 261 installs, 177 votes. As discussed earlier on this list: if the package isn't particu

Re: New QA members

On Thu, July 27, 2006 15:33, Christoph Berg wrote: > The QA team has added new members to the 'qa' unix group: Great, but what does that mean specifically? Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: taking over a neglected RC-buggy package

On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 10:25 +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > The maintainer was long ago reported as MIA. > > Please make ypourself the new maintainer. There is no need to to have > your name as uploader in this case. It would help if the MIA team then orphaned all his packages at once to

Re: taking over a neglected RC-buggy package

Hello George, > Advice: I've been told to consult the QA team for advice and for formal > MIA > tracking. If the package is to be left in the cold, I'm ready to take it over > adding myself to Uploaders:, while the original Maintainer: will remain as it > is. Well, I'm still in the NM qu

Re: messagewall - remove from debian or not?

retitle 274732 RM: messagewall -- RoQA, orphaned, dead upstream reassign 274732 ftp.debian.org thanks Hello all, > What do we think about removing messagewall from debian? Since the message from Paul didn't attract any opposition to this plan, after consulting Paul I'm now requesting messagewall

  1   2   >