On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 05:51:12PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
Hi,
> The only issue left is if this upload should be an NMU upload or an QA
> one, in the latter case possibly orphaning wizznic?
>From my point of view you you can go with a QA upload. The only maintainer
upload was four years a
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 06:51:25PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
Hi
> I should orphan the package? Could you check if the maintainer is MIA?
>
> Please note that I haven't tried contacting the maintainer. For my
> 2012 NMU he never responded though.
He's not yet in the MIA database (adding mia
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:07:41AM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Le 27/09/2015 21:13, Jesse Rhodes a écrit :
> > Replacing xchat and absorbing the userbase was more-or-less the idea
> > behind packaging hexchat in the first place, so yes, I'm willing.
> >
> > It's true you can't directly migrate
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 08:48:02AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2015-09-27 08:44, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 08:42:18PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> >>
> >> If neither Davide nor Bart (just CC'ed) speak up for keeping it, I am in
> >> favour of xchat being removed/replace
Hi,
since Sandro gave up on package removal sprees some time ago I've lost
track on the process of package removals beside of maintainer requests.
Is someone actually working on removing unmaintained stuff from Debian
at the moment?
In a bleak moment prior to the jessie release I did the last uplo
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:40:08PM +0200, Mònica wrote:
Hi,
> But in Debian archives, there is the "long" solution (I copied from there). I
> can't understand why these libraries were linked if they aren't used.
Hm I see, guess I looked at the first part of the makefile but it even
that is ove
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:25:20AM +0200, Mònica wrote:
> I think it's everything solved, but I'm sorry I don't understand what you
> mean with "the linking in debia/rules can be shortened" :-(
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libSM.so.6 could be avoided if
"debian/xsol/usr/games/xsol" we
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:09:05PM +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:49:29AM +0200, Mònica wrote:
Hi,
> > I am looking for a sponsor for a QA upload for the package "xsol", a
> > solitaire game for the X Windows system.
>
> I just had a very first look. In general, it see
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 01:47:23PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Hi,
> Experimental is a development resource and not a dump for packages that
> should not be in unstable/testing. Abusing it sounds like a bad idea, so
> IMO think the current regime with a tad (but not overly) more aggressive
Hi all,
I've submitted a patch for #495246 (xosd) and #494224 (perlipq)
and it really looks like both package maintainers are MIA.
For xosd that's [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the last maintainer upload
in 2004 followed by 5 NMUs in the last years. According to qa.d.o
it's still not set to O.
perlipq j
10 matches
Mail list logo
