On Sunday, October 16, 2016 11:48:32 AM CDT Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > My suggestion is that the ones with "snapshots" in the path are simply
> > filtered out from list displayed by the reflector as these are not
>
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
The uscan download from sourceforge doesn't download what you expect
for boost. The reason is that the link provided by the reflector page
[1] is incorrect: it leads to a "snapshot" url [2]. The correct
URL is [3].
Paul Wise indicated [4] that the reflect
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
In the DDPO display, I have some packages that have been removed from
unstable and testing, but remain in stable, oldstable, etc. I'd like
to filter these out from the display.
In the Display Configuration, I set the "Version" flag to "testing and
new
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
On my package overview page [1], I have several iterations of boost
sources: boost1.42, boost1.46, boost1.48, and boost1.49. They all
have the same kind of information in the control file, but boost1.49
is filed down in "Sponsored/other uploads" rather than
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: important
I just noticed that the web page
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=smr%40debian.org&comaint=yes
says "No packages in unstable", which is quite false. :-) It was
working yesterday.
-Steve
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 06:00:06PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Malloc debugging, #285685 suggests it is broken for > 300 days now,
> either update or remove:
>
>Steve M. Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ccmallocBuild-Depends: g++-2.95 [alpha arm
Hello,
Long ago I promised to adopt ccmalloc. Unfortunately, it had
slipped my mind until I was reminded the other day by Adrian...
I have packaged the new upstream and will upload it very soon. The
new version tries to detect libc at build time, so I think it is going
to fix this bug. You wil
7 matches
Mail list logo
