On Wednesday 2 May 2001, at 9 h 48,
Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, he is still active, at least at debian-french.
I also uploaded packages last month. But I agree, queso needs a new release.
Expect it next week.
On Thursday 22 February 2001, at 15 h 6,
the keyboard of Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3. REDISTRIBUTION
>
>This software may not be redistributed without prior
>written permission from BB4 Technologies Inc.
>
> So, someone would have to ask them.
I got this written au
On Thursday 18 November 1999, at 14 h 31, the keyboard of Raphael Hertzog
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, POSIX is in perl-5.005-base. But some files (autosplit.ix at least)
> are missing.
It is already reported (#50242), with severity:Important (hence RC). Giving
the incredible number of seve
On Thursday 18 November 1999, at 12 h 30, the keyboard of Raphael Hertzog
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A script with "use POSIX" will fail.
OK, it means POSIX is not in perl-base.
* Is it a problem? For who?
* Should I fill in a bug for that?
> It's not that easy. The data-dumper package is f
On Thursday 18 November 1999, at 1 h 21, the keyboard of Adam Di Carlo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 'base', as you may know, is the set of packages or even partial
> packages built by the boot-floppies. You can install it even just by
> untarring it and chrooting to it.
And for the people who
On Sunday 3 October 1999, at 4 h 46, the keyboard of Yves Arrouye
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know this has been a topic recently, but I really wonder how long it
> takes to get a membership. Is it something that can be estimated at
> least?
No. In the mean time, you can:
- ask for a sponsor
On Tuesday 30 March 1999, at 9 h 19, the keyboard of Damon Buckwalter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe Debian needs to appoint an official 'Bug Czar' in charge of
> stamping out all of these old bugs. 'Just say no to bugs!(tm)'
>
> Or, does something like this already exist?
The QA group, ma
On Tuesday 30 March 1999, at 0 h 24, the keyboard of Martin Schulze
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quite easy. Many upstream maintainers aren't aware that some Debian
> people picked up their package and worked on them.
As a rule, I *always* ask for permission of upstream authors. Even when the
On Monday 29 March 1999, at 11 h 32, the keyboard of Martin Schulze
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh well, sure it is. But developers behave different. Some of them
> follow each policy change and each suggestion at once, some others
> are waiting until lintian tells them what to do, some are wa
On Monday 29 March 1999, at 1 h 17, the keyboard of Adam Di Carlo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * check that patches that should be sent upstream are being sent
> upstream -- I think this is very important and I think we have a
> bit of a bad reputation on this count.
Could you elaborat
On Sunday 28 March 1999, at 21 h 48, the keyboard of Martin Schulze
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ Mailing to Debian Development and Debian QA, please send replies
> *only* to Debian QA ]
As you wish but please CC: me, I'm not on debian-qa.
> What is debian-qa and is it eatable?
I agree wit
On Friday 12 February 1999, at 15 h 54, the keyboard of Wichert Akkerman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > jdk1.132548 Java doesn't work at all for me on slink [13] (=
> Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>
> I vaguely remember someone fixing this?
I don't find it really fixed (it i
On Thursday 4 February 1999, at 21 h 32, the keyboard of Sven Rudolph
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Things are different. The machine is owned by and runs at Technical
> University of Dresden. As does {ftp,www}.de.debian.org .
>
> We cannot give accounts to other people.
OK, I understand your po
On Monday 1 February 1999, at 18 h 46, the keyboard of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Julian Gilbey) wrote:
> > It is but I'm afraid the bugs have not been closed. Heiko seems really
> > overloaded (and does not reply a lot even on other subjects) so an
> > help may be welcome.
>
> I'd be prepared to help,
On Sunday 31 January 1999, at 0 h 48, the keyboard of Michael Stone
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > boot-floppies 32269 partion harddisk fails if WIN95_EXTENDED present
> > [0] (Enrique Zanardi )
>
> The report log is a little unclear. It looks like there is a version of cfdisk
> that work
15 matches
Mail list logo
