Re: another point related to (older) python

2023-03-10 Thread Stéphane Blondon
Le jeu. 9 mars 2023 à 21:24, Patrice Duroux a écrit : > Hi, > > Regarding my previous post about replacing '2&>1' by '2>&1', most of > the issues reported upstream have been closed. Great! > > Another point is about the following command: > apt-file search -x 'python(2|3\.(0|2|4|5|6|7|8|9))' > ?

Re: Started porting UDD to Python3 (Was: [UDD] Is there some effort to port UDD to Python3?)

2020-05-18 Thread Stéphane Blondon
On 18/05/2020 14:59, Andreas Tille wrote: > thanks for your patch which I applied in the python3 branch. Unfortunately > it does not solve the issue Can you send me the file 'gatherer.${I_dont_know_the_command}' which raises the UnicodeDecodeError exception? I will try to write a working patch.

Re: Started porting UDD to Python3 (Was: [UDD] Is there some effort to port UDD to Python3?)

2020-05-18 Thread Stéphane Blondon
Hello, On 15/05/2020 21:10, Andreas Tille wrote:> Would you mind providing a patch with chardet? There is a patch attached to this e-mail. I used [1] for the base file. I don't think the patch is great (because there are two 'open()' calls) but it has minimal modifications of the current source c

Re: Started porting UDD to Python3 (Was: [UDD] Is there some effort to port UDD to Python3?)

2020-05-15 Thread Stéphane Blondon
On 14/05/2020 21:25, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > And, ideally, somebody would contact whoever is providing that file so that > they re-encode it with utf8... Yes, it's the best long term solution. > On Thu, 14 May 2020, 9:16 pm Stéphane Blondon, > wrote: >> >> `f = o

Re: Started porting UDD to Python3 (Was: [UDD] Is there some effort to port UDD to Python3?)

2020-05-14 Thread Stéphane Blondon
On 14/05/2020 11:43, Andreas Tille wrote: > UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0xc5 in position 11: > invalid continuation byte The error is like [1] where the file is not encoded utf-8. 1: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5552555/unicodedecodeerror-invalid-continuation-byte

Bug#778240: tracker.debian.org has much worse display clarity

2016-01-02 Thread Stéphane Blondon
Le 30/12/2015 19:06, Ian Jackson a écrit : > Stéphane Blondon writes ("Re: Bug#778240: tracker.debian.org has much worse > display clarity"): >> I can provide a new demo which fixes these remarks if you're interested. > > That would be great. That would offer Ra

Bug#778240: tracker.debian.org has much worse display clarity

2015-12-30 Thread Stéphane Blondon
Le 28/12/2015 14:06, Ian Jackson a écrit : > Stéphane Blondon writes ("Re: Bug#778240: tracker.debian.org has much worse > display clarity"): >> Le 18/12/2015 15:38, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : >>> But before spending lots of time with bootstrap, have a try by t

Bug#778240: tracker.debian.org has much worse display clarity

2015-12-28 Thread Stéphane Blondon
Le 18/12/2015 15:38, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > I use v4 alpha2 currently. I have no experience rebuilding bootstrap > currently but there are some docs: > http://v4-alpha.getbootstrap.com/getting-started/build-tools/ >[...] > Once rebuilt you just have to put the .css file in > distro_tracker/htm

Re: can I help to replace packages.qa.debian.org by tracker.debian.org?

2015-10-02 Thread Stéphane Blondon
Hello, I subscribed to the qa-team mailing list so non need to keep me in cc. Le 01/10/2015 09:37, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > The presentation was made by Christophe Siraut but I answered some > questions at the end :-) You're right. > I'm also rather unhappy by the fact that each view of pac

can I help to replace packages.qa.debian.org by tracker.debian.org?

2015-09-30 Thread Stéphane Blondon
Hello, I'd like to help to replace packages.qa.debian.org by tracker.debian.org. As far I understood the presentation by Raphaël Hertzog in DebConf15, there are lacking features which prevent to switch. So I'd to send patches to reach this goal. I write web application with python (but not with D