Bug#99646: Should Provides: man-browser?

2001-06-01 Thread Shaul Karl
Package: coolman Version: N/A Severity: normal Should have in the control file Provides: man-browser ? -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux rakefet 2.2.19pre17 #1 Thu May 10 19:09:42 IDT 2001 i586 unknown

Bug#91341: error while loading shared libraries

2001-03-25 Thread Shaul Karl
Package: ical Version: 2.2-9 Severity: normal [02:33:14 /tmp]$ ical & [1] 15492 [02:34:29 /tmp]$ [1]+ Stopped ical [02:34:30 /tmp]$ fg ical ical: error while loading shared libraries: libtcl8.3.so: cannot load shared object file: No such file or directory [02:34:32 /tmp]$ --

Re: ps reports Error: /proc must be mounted and also Segmentation fault?

1999-11-26 Thread Shaul Karl
> On Fri Nov 26, 1999 at 07:07:27AM +0200, Shaul Karl wrote: > > > > I am using > > http://www.debian.org/~aph/boot-floppies/19991118/bf-common.tar.gz. > > untarred them into the common dir. > [snip-] > > > > Also note there are diffe

Re: ps reports Error: /proc must be mounted and also Segmentation fault?

1999-11-26 Thread Shaul Karl
> On Fri Nov 26, 1999 at 04:27:15AM +0200, Shaul Karl wrote: > > I am just playing around with bf-common, not really knowing what I am > > doing. > > However, the following does not look right: > > > > rakefet:/# ps > > Error: /proc must be mounted > &

pkgsel

1999-11-26 Thread Shaul Karl
Keep playing around with bf-common: After issuing rakefet:/# /root/pkgsel I got /root/pkgsel: [: too many arguments And then I got the ncurses screen of Debian Installation. 1) The marked line is able to be in the 3rd and 5th empty lines, although only the 1st, 2nd and 4th are m

ps reports Error: /proc must be mounted and also Segmentation fault?

1999-11-26 Thread Shaul Karl
I am just playing around with bf-common, not really knowing what I am doing. However, the following does not look right: rakefet:/# ps Error: /proc must be mounted To mount /proc at boot you need an /etc/fstab line like: /proc /proc procdefaults In the meantime, mount /proc /pro

Re: request that base gets testing by test groups

1999-11-24 Thread Shaul Karl
> As you may know, at this point, boot-floppies itself is not yet > alpha-ready. However, I do think we can proceeding on significant > testing of the base system itself, apart from the boot-floppies. > > 'base', as you may know, is the set of packages or even partial > packages built by the boot