hi michael,
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 09:09:33AM -0500, Michael Shuler wrote:
> There are a couple of interested parties currently working on pgpool2
> packaging - myself and Rodolphe Quiédeville are in touch on the
> pkg-postgresql-public mailing list, and we'll work together to get a
> clean, curr
Package: pgpool2
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
it's been well over a year and a half since this bug was filed, and
there have been several new upstream releases of this software.
furthermore, looking at the bug tracking system i see zero activity in
over a year
hiya,
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 08:55:10PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I've started hacking a bit on patch-tracking.d.n, with the (initial)
> goal of integrating it in the PTS, but I ended up patching other stuff
> :-), more on this later.
care to share? i'll have a bit of free time between
On Friday 30 May 2008 08:32:18 am Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> How much static content will you have? I mean: it's not like this
> service will receive millions of requests per day. It could be better to
> have only a few static pages, and do everything else on-demand.
well, i'm taking a fairly conser
On Friday 30 May 2008 08:42:27 am Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:33:01AM +0200, sean finney wrote:
> > one open question i have now is with regards to the eventual hosting of
> > the system: does it seem reasonable that the final version could either
&g
hi folks,
just a quick update, the PoC that i was doing was quickly getting complicated
enough that i've abandoned it in favor of an initial implementation code that
will hopefully be useful in the final version as well. thus it has
introduced some more delay, as i was evaluating a few differ
hiya,
> Hi Sean,
>
> Have you had time to work on something?
progress was slower than i would have liked, but yes there's progress. i
should have something to show in a day or two.
sean
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
hiya,
On Wednesday 21 May 2008 08:56:20 am Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> It could possibly be "mole-based" so that it can automatically process any
> new source package that gets uploaded to Debian.
> http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/mole/doc
> (The table "devpackages-src" would be your "TodoSource")
tha
oh, missed some comments at the top:
On Wednesday 21 May 2008 08:56:20 am Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> It really looks like the patches.debian.org discussed on -devel. ;-)
if it's in that "debian patches" discussion, i killfiled the whole thing
because the S:N ratio was getting a little low. but
hiya,
On Wednesday 21 May 2008 07:02:30 am Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> What you propose sounds like adding a lot of information to the PTS
> page. Why did you choose that, instead of a separate website
> (http://patches.d.o)?
after looking over the sources for the pts, i agree that the best place to
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi,
this is both a request and an notice of intent that i may try to
implement something :)
my proposal is that the current "patches" section on a source package's
qa package is modified so that the followin
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: minor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
for example, from http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/php5.html:
line 7 column 1 - Warning: inserting "type" attribute
so i believe
should be
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers
hi martin,
On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 06:41:43PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Michael said in that bug report that the bug submitter (or you, I
> guess) are welcome to adopt the package. Sean, are you still
> interested in adopting vsound?
i don't recall having volunteered to do so (i didn't in
13 matches
Mail list logo
