Re: ignoring bugs with no maintainer (Re: Removal of emacs23 from unstable/testing)

2014-05-14 Thread Rob Browning
stgresql migration work. I agree (as far as emacsXY and guile-X.Y are concerned). Anyone should feel free to reassign them to emacs24 (or guile-2.0 respectively). Otherwise, I'll plan to do it. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1

Re: ignoring bugs with no maintainer (Re: Removal of emacs23 from unstable/testing)

2014-05-14 Thread Rob Browning
Rob Browning writes: > I agree (as far as emacsXY and guile-X.Y are concerned). Anyone should > feel free to reassign them to emacs24 (or guile-2.0 respectively). > > Otherwise, I'll plan to do it. And I hope it goes without saying, but I'm always happy to have help

Problems with packages depending on libguile

2001-02-11 Thread Rob Browning
(>= 1:1.4-7), which is exactly what the current libguile9 shilbs file specifies. Does this seem reasonable, and likely to fix the problem? Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks. -- Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for November 26, 1999

1999-11-29 Thread Rob Browning
Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Package: emacs20 (main) > > Maintainer: Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 33237 /etc/alternatives/emacs not managed properly - /usr/bin/emacs > > doesn't run emacs20 > > [STRATEGY] Maintaine