Hi,
Opensync family of packages has accumulated a full of 21 RC bugs [1] without any
comments from the maintainer. Furthermore, some of the packages block the
lafiles
release goal[2].
Looking at the list of packages:
libopensync-plugin-evolution2, broken, #619712
libopensync-plugin-file
libopen
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 12:16:56AM +0100, Marco Rodrigues wrote:
> I've saw that a new version of powerprefs is at mentors, but anyone had
> sponsored it yet.
> http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=powerprefs
perhaps it's a good idea to ask users and the perso
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 01:33:55PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> But not, aparently Ubuntu is the only derivative that matters.
I think Ubuntu only one were people have asked a link to be added.
If you know a derivate distro with a open bugtracker that is easy to link
to, please file a request. Mos
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 05:09:42PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> There is one thing I never understood:
> we have that great bugtracking system and on the other side there is some
> ubuntu guy who thinks a package needs a patch. Why is it not possible that
> the same guy who does the patch fills
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 04:32:21PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Martin Pitt schrieb am Wednesday, den 28. May 2008:
> > How many patches does Debian get from Ubuntu [1]? How many from those
> > other derivatives?
> In the last few years for my packages? 0 from all.
I have fixed a bunch of FTBF
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
http://cvs.debian.org/srcdep/Packages-arch-specific?root=dak&view=markup
This information is already listed in Jeroen's buildd status[1], but I
think it would be a good idea to have it on the PTS page as well, as
quite few maintainers seem to be aware tha
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: minor
Can you please add armel debcheck now that armel is included in the
archive?
http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?list=INDEX&package=&arch=&dist=sid
There might be other places at qa.d.o where armel is missing from, but
so far this is the only place I found.
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 01:50:40PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 11:07:56AM +0900, Paul Wise wrote:
> > I'd also like to see the PTS using jeroen's buildd status page instead
> > of igloo's buildd status page since it is more useful.
>
> URL please
>
> Anyhow the
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 03:35:10PM +0100, Martin Buck wrote:
> > - only few reverse dependencies
> > - relatevely low popcon count 500
> Rank #6235 might be relatively low, but in that case, there are 1s of
> packages that would be candidates for removal...
Low installation count alone does
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 02:49:46PM +0100, Volker Ossenkopf wrote:
> community using them. I am myself convinced that none of the
> existing replacements for workman are comparably simple, flexible
> and powerful. I did not find any replacement for workman that
> satisfied my needs.
Both gnome and
Hi,
After considering porter NMU on xview, I think x11 toolkit can safely
be canned as museumware. Most damning is the lack of 64bit support.
See #228957 and #320155, although a patch was produduced nobody bothered,
applying it, nor is the author confident that patch is correct.
The upstream is m
> I do not want that, I just want the install count and optionally the
> percentage. Now (at least on the version of the page I'm viewing) it's just a
> link that says "Popcon stats".
Random sugggestion: this would be easier to implement if there was an standard
format for importing such data fo
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 04:37:25PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > http://people.debian.org/~blade/pranger/ranking.html
> I seems to me that by these metrics the "best" way to contribute to
> Debian is to find something extremely obscure that has 1 user (you, or
> perhaps your
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Debian packages have changelogs available via packages.debian.org[1] or
changelogs.debian.org. It would be very usefull to have link for those
in the packages PTS page, now you have to browse through news items to
find find where a specific change was made
On Sat, Sep 11, 2004 at 03:27:01PM +0200, Fabrice LORRAIN wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On an uptodate pre-sarge box, the following shows some binaries linked
> with libraries under /usr. Those binaries might (didn't test) fail when
> /usr is not mounted.
>
> Is there a policy against this ?
We follow
On Saturday 21 February 2004 21:00, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:37:22PM +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
> > This are some idea for an advanced automatic Debian-qa system:
> > The Debian-qa and debian devel could develop a system for trace all
> > upstream version of a software u
On Friday 20 February 2004 23:37, Bluefuture wrote:
> So this alert sensors could perform some automatical tasks. For example:
>
> - Defcon 5 Send an automatic alert via email to Debian Qa
> - Defcon 4 Send an automatic email to Debian Qa and open an automatic
> wishlist or minor bug on the package
he package from testing ?
Certainly having an updated airstrike (even whithout sounds) is
a better solution. I think removal just because of one 16d old
RC bug is definetly an overkill.
--
Riku Voipio|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
kirkkonummentie 33 |+358 40 8476974
ways dubious.
You could to start by creating checks for linda/lintian
that give warn if debian/watch is missing or doesnt
seem to work. And ignore the missing debian/watch if
the package is a native debian package.
This is a lot less intrusive than massfiling bugs.
--
Riku Voipio
so they only get
3.7 for score.. The ip addressess vary all along 64.119.192.0/19
netrange, which appears SBL listed. kinda frsustrating.
--
Riku Voipio|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
kirkkonummentie 33 |+358 40 8476974 --+--
021
://packages.qa.debian.org/n/nagi.html
I don't subscribe to debian-devel-changes, which seems to
be the source of these messages. So I don't know if these
changes got lost because the list failed to deliver them
PTS, or where these items where lost.
--
Riku Voipio|[EMAIL
21 matches
Mail list logo
