index-pack failed
Is this fixable or just a temporary server issue?
In case of the former, can I help to fix this somehow?
best regards,
¹ https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/vcswatch?package=claws-mail
--
Ricardo Mones
http://people.debian.org/~mones
«Not responsible for typographical errors.»
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 08:09:23AM -0300, zaza wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:17:15 +0200 Salman Mohammadi wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:43:38 +0100 Ricardo Mones wrote:
> > >
> > > The links to .dsc file wich appear on versioned links panel for securi
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi maintainers,
The links to .dsc file wich appear on versioned links panel for security
versions are using httpredir.d.o, which always gives 40x errors for those
package versions. Example: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/claws-mail
(3.8.1-2+deb7u1 and
log not found in branches master debian
Is it possible to also search just for "changelog"?
Or does this change means that gbp is the only allowed system to
maintain packages with git? (I hope not ;-P)
best regards,
--
Ricardo Mones
http://people.debian.org/~mones
«You will
to search a couple
of the addresses/packages on your list but no luck on the DUCK ;)
Thanks,
--
Ricardo Mones
~
Don't take the name of root in vain. /usr/src/linux/README
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
e.
Just curious, which address did you mail "Debian" to tell that?
Anyway in the future try to mail the MIA team, se details on team's page:
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/MIA
regards,
--
Ricardo Mones
~
Datei nicht gefunden Fehler
Hi Andreas,
On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 10:31:48AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder how I can detect from UDD whether a package was sponsored and
> who might be the sponsor. Any idea?
http://udd.debian.org/sponsorstats.cgi ?
regards,
--
Ricardo Mones
~
t packages?
>
> I found some error in the manpage of snwodrop, which I already have a
> patch for. I would like to, well take this as a starting point to get
> more involved in Debian.
You can be the maintainer, some DD has to upload it, see
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsF
There's another co-maintainer of haproxy, which is a developer (acornet).
Have you also contacted him?
Anyway, I'm afraid this is not the correct place for this kind of mails,
see:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/beyond-pkging.html#mia-qa
regards,
--
R
On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 23:56:57 +0400
"Dmitry E. Oboukhov" wrote:
> > Dimitri: centerim
>
> > Could you make debian/control::Maintainer point to you only in
> > next upload.
>
> Ok
And close the corresponding bug when you do it:
http://bugs.debian.org/
o packages.qa.debian.org?
Instead of adding more fields to the already crowded control file,
isn't better to use the already available interfaces of PTS to show
that static info?
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/resources.html#pts-web
regards,
--
Ricardo Mones
~
Hi Markus,
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 01:27:31AM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> On Sat, 24. Nov 12:18 Ricardo Mones wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 08:50:04AM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> [..]
> > > Sounds good. But now i'm wondering, why not making the next step
out deserve being packaged.
Can you package them? Then do not be too eager to deal out removals in
judgement. For even the very wise cannot see all ends.”
Well, maybe wasn't talking about packages, anyway...
--
Ricardo Mones
~
Quantity derives from measurement, figures from quant
packages could be tagged I: homepage-in-binary-package
and note about it won't be displayed on PTS with a recommendation to
move the Homepage to the source paragraph.
thanks in advance,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:18:43AM +0100, Ricardo Mones wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: nor
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
Some packages [0] have a Homepage in binary package paragraph but not in
source package paragraph. These homepages are not displayed in PTS.
While it's allowed by policy to have a Homepage in binary I think these
should be displayed like the ones in th
mail).
>
> But private mails should count in the ITO evaluation.
Nope, if there's no public record there's no guarantee it was delivered.
Did you forget mail is not a realiable service?
--
Ricardo Mones
~
Don't take the name of root in vain. /usr/src/linux/README
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ulness of the work can be disputed even. If the end of salvaging is
reached there's really no point on keeping current maintainer.
regards,
--
Ricardo Mones
~
The world will end in 5 minutes. Please log out.Unknown
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Arno,
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:25:45 +0200
Arno Töll wrote:
> Hi Ricardo,
> (hi MIA folks, I assume you are subscribed to -qa, but here is the
> start of the thread: [1])
I believe we're all subscribed to qa, but thanks anyway :)
> On 28.09.2012 22:51, Ricardo Mone
n fact there's little the MIA team can do with those maintainers, so
this procedure could be a nicer alternative.
Otherwise the MIA team should be Cc-ed first, when reporting the bug: the
maintainer may be very likely MIA, I don't see a reason to wait more. And
if MIA te
suitable for all packages, so allowing
anybody to take RFAs could degrade even more packaging quality.
regards,
--
Ricardo Mones
http://people.debian.org/~mones
«I dote on his very absence. -- William Shakespeare, "The Merchant of
Venice"»
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 03:03:33PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Monday 20 August 2012 01:18 PM, Ricardo Mones wrote:
> > Mail is already sent when a package migrates succesfully, so absence of
> > such mail on the expected time should give you a hint.
> >
>
xpected time should give you a hint.
The situations you describe already grant very likely you have received
an RC bug mail describing the problem. You already know an RC bug will
prevent your package from migrating, so another mail telling the obvious
is just useless IMO.
regards,
-
vore data I think this is
probably better phrased as "Detect maintainers with low packaging activity".
regards,
--
Ricardo Mones
~
bash: ./signature: No such file or directory /bin/bash
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
dnsZoneEntry: duckcorp IN MX 20 mx0.hivane.net.
dnsZoneEntry: duckcorp IN MX 20 mx2.hivane.net.
regards,
--
Ricardo Mones
~
You have the capacity to learn from mistakes. You'll learn a lot
today. /usr/games/fortune
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ntaining them instead.
> >
> > I hate learning that lesson.
>
> Likewise. Such removals make me want to quit Debian just a little bit
> more and maintain packages just a little bit less.
Yeah, I have to agree, sadly.
--
Ricardo Mones
~
Datei nicht gefunden
pe, it's the FTP team the one who removes packages, see:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#removing-pkgs
regards,
--
Ricardo Mones
~
The world will end in 5 minutes. Please log out.Unknown
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
but the corresponding files still in db/).
Querying DD logins seems to work though, so not sure what has been changed
on the machine.
regards,
--
Ricardo Mones
~
Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but
that's not why we do it.
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 11:22:10AM +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 08:56:08 +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
[...]
> > It's trying to retrieve http://p.googlecode.com/files/ but
> > files are now at http://.googlecode.com/files/.
>
> No, it's not. H
edirector should be changed to parse the page
http://code.google.com/p//downloads/list instead, which
should be no problem. Just for fun played a bit and got this pipe to show
the list of files from that page:
wget -O - 'http://code.google.com/p//downloads/list' | grep
'h
tic text ("Same", "==",
whatever you see fit): differences will be seen easily, and screen width can
be saved (specially if you have packages with long version strings [0]).
regards,
[0] Example: 1.2~20100321+git4224970-1
--
R
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 01:03:34PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Ricardo Mones writes:
> > Ralf Treinen wrote:
>
> >> How would that change the situation? There still would be only one binary
> >> package which has Architecture=all, right?
>
> > But
could be generated empty if the building
architecture is one if the kfreebsd ones where the recommended package
doesn't exist.
regards,
--
Ricardo Mones
~
You have the capacity to learn from mistakes. You'll learn a lot
today. /usr/games/fortune
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:02:23PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 24/05/10 at 11:14 +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
> > So we're back at what I said in the other mail: if those processes we
> > already have take too long let's shorten them and make those neglected
&
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 09:48:27AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 24/05/10 at 09:31 +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
> >
> > Hi Lucas,
> >
> > [Though not very active, I'm subscribed to QA ;-)]
> >
> > On Sun, 23 May 2010 19:22:07 +0200
> > L
Hi Lucas,
[Though not very active, I'm subscribed to QA ;-)]
On Sun, 23 May 2010 19:22:07 +0200
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 23/05/10 at 12:32 +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
> > On Sun, 23 May 2010 08:40:44 +0200
> > Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >
> > > > Thi
On Sun, 23 May 2010 12:43:57 +0200
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 12:32:47PM +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
> > > So? NMUs are not only for serious bugs.
> >
> > Then, as Ana said, the developers reference should be changed because
> > that&#x
"When and how to do
an NMU": «Does your NMU really fix bugs? Fixing cosmetic issues or
changing the packaging style in NMUs is discouraged.»
regards,
--
Ricardo Mones
http://people.debian.org/~mones
«Q: What's yellow, and equivalent to the Axiom of Choice? A: Zorn's
everal things you can do without being developer. The list
archives are also valuable to understand how things are done...
regards,
--
Ricardo Mones
~
The three principal virtues of a programmer are Laziness,
Impatience, and Hubris.man perl
s
38 matches
Mail list logo
