Bug#1095132: tracker.debian.org: patch to forward upstream should not appear if patch has Applied-Upstream

On Tue, 04 Feb 2025, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > I tend to agree with you but this is under control of UDD and AFAIK UDD > is just applying what's documented in DEP-3. There have been suggestions > to update DEP-3 regarding this but nothing happened IIRC. I remember > dis

Bug#1095132: tracker.debian.org: patch to forward upstream should not appear if patch has Applied-Upstream

Hi, On Tue, 04 Feb 2025, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > The tracker currently displays "debian/patches: 1 patch to forward > upstream". It should not appear give how the patch is applied upstream > pending the next upstream release and the cherry-pick features the > Applied-Upstream stanza. FTR here

Bug#1088254: tracker.debian.org: seems to be severely lagging behind ci.debian.net for (at least) some packages

Hi, On Tue, 26 Nov 2024, Julian Gilbey wrote: > Hi Raphael, > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 05:29:22PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Tue, 26 Nov 2024, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > > I think what happened was that the reporting from ci.debian.

Bug#1088254: tracker.debian.org: seems to be severely lagging behind ci.debian.net for (at least) some packages

Hello, On Tue, 26 Nov 2024, Julian Gilbey wrote: > I think what happened was that the reporting from ci.debian.net to > tracker.debian.org went down for a period; I manually retried all of > the tests a few hours ago, and now they are all showing on tracker > (most passed or "No tests, ...", and o

Re: coordination between lintian/piuparts/adequate

Hello, On Fri, 01 Nov 2024, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote: > > Or maybe it would help if adequate could be run in a debusine task. We > > already have tasks to run lintian and piuparts but we are lacking one for > > adequate. > > thanks for the pointer to debusine. however it seems to be mean

Re: coordination between lintian/piuparts/adequate

Hello, On Tue, 29 Oct 2024, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote: > One of the strengths of lintian and piuparts is a lot of people run them > each time they build a package. Adequate needing the package to be installed > makes it harder to integrate in that workflow. > > Maybe if it was a feature in s

Bug#1077833: UDD: screenshots importer broken -- currently disabled

(Adding Christoph Haas in copy, he recently fixed another regression that affected tracker.debian.org's import) On Fri, 02 Aug 2024, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: udd > > the screenshots importer is broken since 2024-07-22. >

Change in JSON output of screenshots.debian.net

Hello Christoph & Paul, I have been getting failures from tracker.debian.org since July 22 about UpdatePackageScreenshotsTask now failing with this error: TypeError list indices must be integers or slices, not str I believe that https://screenshots.debian.net/json/packages used to be a dictionar

Re: DPT and UDD regarding d/watch file failure

On Tue, 23 Jul 2024, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 11:35:13PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > I don't know where tracker.debian.org gets its data about upstream > > status (and errors). I thought it was using UDD, but apparently it > > isn't. > > It is: > https://salsa.debian.or

Bug#1075784: tracker.debian.org: Tracker is not sending email notifications for subscriptions

On Fri, 05 Jul 2024, J Mo wrote: > It just occurred to me that the package names themselves might a part of the > problem, rather than just the checkboxes. Yes, exactly, that's what I meant. I have opened https://salsa.debian.org/qa/distro-tracker/-/issues/72 to track this issue. I prefer gitlab

Bug#1067490: tracker.debian.org: Display release-team blocks more prominently

Hi, top-posting and leaving quite some context because the main point of my message is to actually share your bug report to the release team. If I remember correctly, tracker.debian.org is not doing any fancy treatment. We are just turning some YAML into HTML: https://release.debian.org/britney/ex

Re: Issue with appstream hints: severity missing for a tag?

Hello Matthias, the issue disappeared since January 27th. Thank you for your help! Cheers, On Sat, 27 Jan 2024, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > Hi Raphael! > > The issue should be gone for a few days already, do you still see it > or is it resolved? > > Best, > Matthias

Issue with appstream hints: severity missing for a tag?

Hello Matthias, I recently opened my ow...@tracker.debian.org mailbox and I found hundreds of errors: Task UpdateAppStreamStatsTask failed with the following traceback. KeyError 'asv-cid-contains-hyphen' Traceback (most recent call last): File "/srv/tracker.debian.org/distro-tracker/dis

Bug#1060192: tracker.debian.org: SSL connection extremely slow and sometimes timing out

On Sun, 07 Jan 2024, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > Package: tracker.debian.org > Severity: important > > Yesterday and today connections to packages.debian.org is *extremely* packages.debian.org is entirely unrelated to tracker.debian.org. It's managed by the web team AFAIK. That said if the issue w

Re: Appstream data not in UTF-8?

On Thu, 07 Dec 2023, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > tracker.debian.org has been failing to import the appstream metadata for a > while (since November 26th) with this exception: Quick correction. The first time it failed that way was on November 19th at 08:13 UTC. Cheers, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ R

Appstream data not in UTF-8?

Hello Matthias, tracker.debian.org has been failing to import the appstream metadata for a while (since November 26th) with this exception: Task UpdateAppStreamStatsTask failed with the following traceback. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/srv/tracker.debian.org/distro-tracker/distro

Review of debusine's lintian related API

Hello Axel, Bastien, Lucas, and other members of the lintian and QA teams, it's been a long time that I have been interested in building some infrastructure to manage scheduling and distribution of Debian-related build, QA and data collection tasks to a network of worker machines. I called this pr

Bug#1040757: dose: (W)CudfAdd: package ncurses-base:amd64 (= 6.4-4) is not associate with an integer in the given universe

Hello Ralf, Le samedi 15 juillet 2023, Ralf Treinen a écrit : > In fact it is not related to dose-distcheck being outdated on quantz, I > get the same error with dose-distcheck on sid. > > Since I do not have time to dig further into this atm (leaving for vacation) > I have now desactivated the u

Bug#1041523: tracker.debian.org: displays autopkgtest for other src:package on same page

Hello, On Thu, 20 Jul 2023, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > The tracker at shows autopkgtest > results for both this src:package and for another src:package. I see no autopkgtest results at all. They are only shown when something fails... and in that case, it

Bug#1038121: tracker.debian.org: debian/patches check vs. single-debian-patch in debian/source/local-options

Hello, On Thu, 15 Jun 2023, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Unsure if this is the right pseudopackage; if not, please reassign. > > The “new” Debian tracker shows: > > debian/patches: 1 patch to forward upstream > > The package however uses the single-debian-patch mechanism > to let a diff be autogen

Bug#1028615: tracker.debian.org: tracker.d.o should display results of reproducible rebuilds, not just reproducible CI results

Hello Holger, On Fri, 14 Apr 2023, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 06:49:48PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > > since some years, tracker.d.o is thankfully showing results from > > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian - which was and is awesome! > > However, these are just con

Bug#1031780: tracker.debian.org: add information about patches

Hi Guillem & Holger, On Sun, 26 Feb 2023, Guillem Jover wrote: > The links for diaspora do not seem to be working though, as at least > the «+» in the version string is not getting encoded, and UDD gives: Duh, I forgot to urlencode the parameters, fixed. (That thought actually popped up in my min

Bug#1031780: tracker.debian.org: add information about patches

Hello Paul, On Mon, 27 Feb 2023, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sun, 2023-02-26 at 17:02 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > > I added the required support in tracker.debian.org > > Personally I think we should replace the Ubuntu panel with a patches > panel, as I have done for the o

Bug#1031780: tracker.debian.org: add information about patches

Hi, On Wed, 22 Feb 2023, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > UDD now includes data about patches (see > https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2023/01/msg2.html ). This data is > already exposed on https://udd.debian.org/patches.cgi and > https://udd.debian.org/dmd/ (see the Patches column in > https://udd.de

Bug#1030734: link to upstream bug tracker and repository

Hi, On Sat, 25 Feb 2023, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > FWIW, I don't plan to work on this (at least not in the short term) but > > I'll happily review MR and answer questions. > > I might spend some time on this, but would appreciate any further hints > on where to add this if the information is ava

Bug#1031393: tracker.debian.org: .dsc links to debian/pool/updates broken

Control: forcemerge 850409 -1 Hello, On Thu, 16 Feb 2023, Holger Levsen wrote: > the links to the .dsc files for (at least) stable-sec and stable-p-u > on https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/spip are 404 > yeah those paths are broken > debian/pool/updates isn't a thing > either debian/pool/{main,

Bug#1030734: link to upstream bug tracker and repository

Hello, On Mon, 06 Feb 2023, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > A large number of Debian packages now has upstream metadata, including links > to > upstream repositories (Repository-Browse) and bugtrackers (Bug-Database / > Bug-Submit). Would it be possible to link to those from tracker? It's of course pos

Bug#1030748: tracker.debian.org doesn't display the correct linux kernel rc upstream version

Hello, On Tue, 07 Feb 2023, xevilstar wrote: > I have noticed that on https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/linux the new > upstream version takes ages to update. How long is "ages" for you? > for example now it displays "A > new upstream version is available: 6.2~rc6" while on > https://git.kernel.or

Re: Lowering the barrier to entry/adoption and (mass) svn-to-git migration

Hello, On Fri, 27 Jan 2023, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > I agree, I think anything that reduces the complexity of the ecosystem > is great and the lowers the barrier for entry. As pretty anything uses > Git now, I think migrating more things from SVN to Git would be great. I will not forbid anyone to

Re: Appstream hints no longer available

Hi, On Sun, 08 Jan 2023, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > Happy new year! Best wishes to you too! > > It looks like that the files required for the tracker.debian.org > > integration have disappeared since mid-December. Can you add them back? > > Shall I disable/remove the integration for now? > > Eww!

Appstream hints no longer available

Hello Matthias, I recently opened my ow...@tracker.debian.org mailbox and I found hundreds of errors: Task UpdateAppStreamStatsTask failed with the following traceback. HTTPError 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://appstream.debian.org/hints/sid/non-free-firmware/Hints-amd64.json.g

Bug#1021728: tracker.debian.org: Please include the new "non-free-firmware" section

Hello Gunnar, On Thu, 13 Oct 2022, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Last week I uploaded raspi-firmware to non-free-firmware (and was > promptly processed through NEW, whee!). > > Two days ago, it successfully migrated to Texting. > > I am now building the Raspberry Pi images for Bookworm , and > raspi-firm

Re: Debian Package Tracker not updating?

Hello, On Wed, 14 Dec 2022, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 11:31:29AM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote: > > Yes, that's exactly the problem. > > https://bugs.debian.org/1026049 is about the same issue. the cron job that updates everything has been stuck since December 10th. I killed it

Re: Revival of lintian.d.o (sort of)

Hello Lucas, On Sun, 03 Jul 2022, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Seeing that lintian got adopted, I got motivated into looking if I could > help on the lintian.d.o side, that is, provide up-to-date archive-wide > up to date to developers. Thanks for working on this! > Since the architecture of lintian.

Bug#1004256: messages to dispatch+aide_cont...@tracker.debian.org get multiplied

Hi, On Sun, 23 Jan 2022, Marc Haber wrote: > I regularly use pack...@packages.debian.org as Maintainer address for my > packages. Having an implicit mailing list for package maintenance issues > is extremele helpful and I appreciate that features. > > Since a few weeks, messages to those addresse

Bug#1002458: "version in VCS newer than in repository" might be a bit overzealous

On Mon, 27 Dec 2021, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Raphael Hertzog > > Christoph, would it be possible to export a supplementary flag showing > > when the changes in NEW or COMMITS contain only changes to > > debian/changelog? > > The proper first step is to change

Bug#1002462: "build log checks report 1 warning" dated a year and 9 uploads ago

Hi, On Wed, 22 Dec 2021, Marc Haber wrote: > for sudo, on https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/sudo, I see an "action > needed" Build log checks report 1 warning". This warning is shown as > having been created on 2020-12-21, while the link points to build logs > from last week. Is this intended? Yes,

Bug#1002461: actions needed should show affected version

Hi, On Wed, 22 Dec 2021, Marc Haber wrote: > in sudo's tracker page, I see that lintian reports 29 errors and 5 > warnings. The link leads me to https://lintian.debian.org/sources/sudo > which tells me that the linan reports are from vresion 1.9.6-1~exp2 and > the lintian run was a month ago. > >

Bug#1002458: "version in VCS newer than in repository" might be a bit overzealous

Hi, On Wed, 22 Dec 2021, Marc Haber wrote: > when I upload a package (for example, foo 1.0-1), I immediately create a > new changelog stanza for a new version foo 1.0.2~1 so that noone > accidentally makes a commit that might end up in the changelog for the > already-uploaded version 1.0-1. > > T

Bug#1001190: tracker.debian.org: news: emails: show Message-ID header, link to lists.d.o/msgid-search

Hi, On Tue, 07 Dec 2021, Paul Wise wrote: > Not necessarily, there are several options for this that would make it > a very generic feature, some ideas: > > When the List-Archive header exists and contains a URL, the link could > be to that URL. This works for Debian lists and mailman lists and >

Bug#1001190: tracker.debian.org: news: emails: show Message-ID header, link to lists.d.o/msgid-search

Hi, On Mon, 06 Dec 2021, Paul Wise wrote: > In the news emails, please show the Message-ID header and make the > value inside the angled brackets <> a link to the Debian lists > msgid-search. For example [1] should link to [2]. > >    1. > https://tracker.debian.org/news/1284147/accepted-purple-

Re: Bug#960154: Feed UDD with just-in-time packaging hints from Lintian

Hi, On Wed, 14 Apr 2021, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > I think that in Debian, we would aim for a better separation between: > > A/ QA tools development, focused on getting the good tools to analyze > packages (output: tools, as Debian packages) > > B/ infrastructure that mass-process the archive usin

Contribute to debusine's design

Hello, some of you might have already heard of "debusine". It aims to be a software factory tailored for the needs of Debian. At some point, it might become a replacement for wanna-build and the buildd, it might also be useful to run archive wide QA tasks (hence the two lists debian-qa@lists.debia

Re: 1.0 format with direct changes in diff (Was: Debian Trends updated)

On Fri, 09 Apr 2021, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > "debian-single-patch" option (that you can put in debian/source/options) "single-debian-patch", sorry https://manpages.debian.org/buster/dpkg-dev/dpkg-source.1.en.html#Format:_3.0_(quilt) Cheers, -- ⢀⣴

Re: 1.0 format with direct changes in diff (Was: Debian Trends updated)

Hello, On Thu, 08 Apr 2021, Bastian Blank wrote: > How do you export changes? And no, creating separate patches breaks as > soon as the history is not linear, like after merging a new upstream > release. Sure, you could rease, but that is not an automatic process. As Mattia pointed out, the "3.

Bug#984999: sso.debian.org is deprecated

Hi, On Fri, 12 Mar 2021, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Incidentally, the fact that the salsa admins decided to not force > account names with -guest anymore, also means that you can't easily > associate salsa accounts to DDs anymore, and AFAIK there is no good way > to establish that as of now (the nm A

Bug#984999: sso.debian.org is deprecated

Hi, On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Antoine Beaupre wrote: > According to the sso.debian.org wiki page, the service is > "deprecated": > > > If you are a service admin please look into using Salsa for this > > purpose. > > It seems to me that tracker.debian.org should fo

Bug#981910: tracker.debian.org: please display key status for packages

Hi, On Fri, 05 Feb 2021, Carles Pina i Estany wrote: > I'm a bit new in the internals of tracker and around. Would this be the > best source for the list of "key" packages? > https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/key_packages.yaml.cgi Yes, since it's referenced from the release team web page: https://re

Bug#981241: tracker.debian.org: please update uscan

Hello, On Thu, 28 Jan 2021, Paolo Greppi wrote: > For yarnpkg: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/node-yarnpkg > tracker.debian.org reports: > > uscan had problems while searching for a new upstream version: > unrecognized option ctype=nodejs > > The option was added with devscripts 2.20.5: > ht

Re: (fwd) Debian Mailing lists ...

Hello Hanno & Mag, I double checked and I confirm that m...@bloss.io was the email used by the package tracker. But that email is no longer subscribed to any package right now. mag.nils...@bloss.io is entirely unknown to the package tracker. Regards, On Wed, 09 Dec 2020, Hanno 'Rince' Wagner wr

Bug#974344: don't display "Debci reports failed tests" for outdated package versions

Hi, On Wed, 11 Nov 2020, Matthias Klose wrote: > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/bambam shows failed tests, and following the > link > shows: >unstable testingstable > amd64 1.0.1+dfsg-1 fail 1.0.2+dfsg-2 pass No test data > > The test result for the unstable test

Bug#973277: tracker.debian.org: Please provide the relevant links to debcheck

Control: reassign -1 release.debian.org Control: retitle -1 britney should indicate the unsatisfiable dependency On Wed, 28 Oct 2020, handsome_feng wrote: > My package ukui-system-monitor blocked when testing migrations, and the > excuses > only says ukui-system-monitor/ppc64el has unsatisfiable

Bug#967086: Empty pages when authenticated

On Thu, 06 Aug 2020, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > Le 05/08/2020 à 14:36, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > >> tracker.debian.org does not seem to respond or responds always empty > >> pages (no error) when I use a client certificate. > > > > I don't have the issue w

Bug#967086: Empty pages when authenticated

Hi, On Tue, 04 Aug 2020, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > tracker.debian.org does not seem to respond or responds always empty > pages (no error) when I use a client certificate. I don't have the issue with my own certificate. I see this in the error log: [Wed Aug 05 11:17:05.798925 2020] [ssl:error] [p

Bug#963887: UDD: 'duck' importer broken since 2020-05-25

On Mon, 29 Jun 2020, Baptiste BEAUPLAT wrote: > > Indeed, creating a dedicated service for this does not seem a good idea. > > I would love to have this feature integrated directly with > distro-tracker. However, I'm wondering about the load that would case > for the service. Network request do n

Bug#963887: UDD: 'duck' importer broken since 2020-05-25

Hi, On Sun, 28 Jun 2020, Bastian Blank wrote: > > Baptiste (CCed) volunteered to write it over again, but for now there is > > no clear timeline as for when the new project will be started. > > Maybe you could add that to vcswatch? or distro-tracker? Indeed, creating a dedicated service for thi

Bug#962000: Duplicated news for php-horde-image

Control: forcemerge 884933 -1 On Mon, 01 Jun 2020, s3v wrote: > I have noticed that tracker.debian.org reports duplicated news for > php-horde-image package [1] and others packages in php-horde ecosystem > (php-horde-data, php-horde-cache, php-horde-crypt, et al.). This was already documented in

Bug#959931: qa.debian.org: udd.debian.org/dmd no more able to display HTML report

Hi, On Wed, 13 May 2020, Xavier wrote: > can someone take a look to this issue ? It becomes difficult to manage > JS Team package without having a view on what to do I can suggest an alternative which is working fine: https://tracker.debian.org/teams/debian-javascript/ :-) Cheers, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀

Bug#955339: tracker.debian.org: improper bounce-process

Hello Tom, On Mon, 30 Mar 2020, Thomas Dickey wrote: >* yesterday, I received multiple messages from ow...@tracker.debian.org > notifying me that my subscription was cancelled. I saw them. >* on the next activity (a followup for byacc) I _immediately_ received > again > multip

Bug#955213: Version information on tracker.d.o in many cases wrong

Control: forcemerge 901500 -1 On Sun, 29 Mar 2020, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Today I found several packages for which the version and release information > is > completely wrong. rmadison and the tracker report different releases for the > same versions. Examples: > > ruby-capistrano-colors > ruby

Re: distro-tracker quick-setup failed

On Sun, 23 Feb 2020, Steven Robbins wrote: > On Sunday, February 23, 2020 2:23:14 A.M. CST Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > > In the mean time, we should possibly update the documentation to explain > > that the quick setup is broken. Willing to submit a MR for this? > > What

Re: distro-tracker quick-setup failed

Hi, On Sat, 22 Feb 2020, Steven Robbins wrote: > >>> Downloading a pre-built sample database file > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "bin/sample-database-url", line 20, in > download_url = td.parent.findChild('a', class_='btn-build')['href'] > TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not su

Re: duck.debian.net down

Ping ? I still have failures on my side (and I get a mail every 30 minutes...). Cheers, On Tue, 21 Jan 2020, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 19 Jan 2020, Simon Kainz wrote: > > thanks for the ping - it seems we have some uplink issues at work. Will > >

Re: duck.debian.net down

Hi, On Sun, 19 Jan 2020, Simon Kainz wrote: > thanks for the ping - it seems we have some uplink issues at work. Will > report back on monday. What's up? I still get failures from distro-tracker. Cheers, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Raphaël Hertzog ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋The Debian Handbook: https://debian-h

Bug#945206: tracker.debian.org: Broken binaries link in glibc page

Hello, On Thu, 21 Nov 2019, Alexandros Prekates wrote: > Visiting https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/glibc > i noticed many dead links in the binaries section > of the page. Those are binary packages that the glibc source package can build but that it only builds on non-release architectures... so in

Bug#931516: tracker.debian.org: fixtures reference testing/updates instead of testing-security

Hi, On Sun, 07 Jul 2019, Paul Wise wrote: > The fixtures reference testing/updates but with bullseye that suite has > been renamed to testing-security. The fixtures in the code need to be > updated and then updated on the live server. I've no idea how to do the > latter, which is why I'm filing th

Bug#930521: tracker.d.o: during freezes dont complain about packages only in experimental

Hi, On Mon, 17 Jun 2019, Paul Wise wrote: > I believe these are the appropriate changes: > > * ask to migrate non-RC/beta/etc to unstable when not in the freeze > * don't ask to package versions that are already in experimental > > Does that sound reasonable

Bug#893572: tracker.debian.org: Debian Maintainer display: [dm] links empty, should be uppercase and use parentheses

On Sat, 15 Jun 2019, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > I also don't know why you picked this bug report to start your journey > into distro-tracker. It's not a trivial issue to fix and the added value > is relatively low compared to other missing features. > > I took the time to

Bug#893572: tracker.debian.org: Debian Maintainer display: [dm] links empty, should be uppercase and use parentheses

On Sat, 15 Jun 2019, Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, 2019-06-14 at 16:13 -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote: > > > Should dm.txt file be downloaded and read once a day? > > (to update/save new info) > > I note there is already code in RetrieveDebianMaintainersTask that > downloads and processes dm.txt so per

Bug#893572: tracker.debian.org: Debian Maintainer display: [dm] links empty, should be uppercase and use parentheses

Hi, On Thu, 13 Jun 2019, Herbert Fortes wrote: > I found where to make the change. But the information about > who gave the permission I do not know where it is at *debian.org. > > In distro_tracker/vendor/debian/rules.py file: > > _add_dm_entry function - extra.append({'display': 'dm'}) > > 'l

Re: Distro Tracker tests

On Wed, 12 Jun 2019, Herbert Fortes wrote: > - tox | tee log.txt >http://paste.debian.net/1087635/ Ah, those errors are unrelated to the functional tests. This is a requirement of the multiprocessing module, it needs to have working semaphore support and for this you need to have /dev/shm mou

Re: Distro Tracker tests

Hi, On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, Herbert Fortes wrote: > I put everything inside a chroot jail and run tox. Selenium worked after > 'xhost' command. But there is a problem. > > Have I done something wrong? I don't know... you don't show a lot of context with your pasted logs... and I don't know what t

Requirements to show something as action item on tracker.debian.org

Hello, while discussing with Johannes Schauer on https://salsa.debian.org/qa/distro-tracker/merge_requests/74 I questioned the use of an action item that would appear on 50% of all packages. Please have a look at the discussion above and let us know your thoughts on the topic. Should we be libera

Bug#928808: tracker.debian.org: automatic filing bugs

Hi, On Sat, 11 May 2019, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > would it be possible to automatically file bugs with issues, already > detected by tracker? Right now, there's no email notification and I certainly agree that there should be some email notification about new upstream releases. Wouldn't that be su

Bug#926684: tracker.debian.org: Outdated team information (here debian-tryton)

Hi, On Tue, 09 Apr 2019, Mathias Behrle wrote: > > It's in the «Update team» link: > > https://tracker.debian.org/teams/debian-tryton/+update/ > > > > But only the team owner has access to this. Are you the team owner? (the > > one who created it?) > > No, I am not. It was created automatically

Bug#926684: tracker.debian.org: Outdated team information (here debian-tryton)

Hi, On Tue, 09 Apr 2019, Mathias Behrle wrote: > URL: http://tryton.alioth.debian.org/ > Maintainer email: maintain...@debian.tryton.org > > I couldn't find a way to update that information via 'Manage team'. > Could you please fix that or point me to where to fix it to It's in the «Update team

Bug#926336: tracker.debian.org: changing the sphinx theme from default to sphinx_rtd_theme

Hi, On Wed, 03 Apr 2019, Salman Mohammadi wrote: > Dear Maintainer, > > It would be nice if we changed the documentation (sphinx) theme from > *default* to *sphinx_rtd_theme*. I suppose it is more visually appealing. Why do you say "I suppose"? Do you find it more visually appealing or not? Did

Bug#926074: RSS-Feed: Server ignores 'Last-Modified' date

Hi, On Sun, 31 Mar 2019, Christian Buhtz wrote: > As developer of a RSS/Atom newsreader I found problems with the RSS-Feed > offerd > by Debian-Tracker. > > The 'Last-Modified' date is ignored when used in a second request in the 'If- > Modified-Since' field. > When there are only some seconds b

Bug#756954: subscription by uploaders

Hello Afif, sorry for the delay. On Sun, 03 Feb 2019, Afif Elghraoui wrote: > The way I was hoping this could work is that Uploaders are automatically > subscribed. I don't know of any reason why an Uploader should not be > following their packages. I think it would also motivate people who > rea

Bug#920024: Doesn't parse package architectures correctly when any-amd64 is used (etc.)

On Mon, 21 Jan 2019, Steve McIntyre wrote: > I've just been looking at the details for sbsigntool > (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/sbsigntool) It looks like the tracker > code is confused by the architecture list for sbsigntool: > > Architecture: any-amd64 any-i386 arm64 armhf > > and is just

Bug#916675: tracker.debian.org: Please show info from ftp.debian.org bugs

On Tue, 18 Dec 2018, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > This is already the case. Here's a current example: > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/janest-core > > > > => « RM: This package has been requested to be removed. » > > then I wonder why it didn't show up for linux-igd. Even 12h after the RM > req

Bug#756117: Resurrecting patch-tracker.d.o

Hi, On Thu, 08 Nov 2018, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > What about linking to the patches like packages.qa.debian.org is doing > it, ie via https://sources.debian.org/patches/ ? See for example > https://packages.qa.debian.org/c/conv-tools.html > for a package > with the patches linked to from the

Bug#908828: tracker.debian.org appears to report that the source package is to be removed, even though it's just the binary

Control: reassign -1 qa.debian.org Control: affects -1 tracker.debian.org On Fri, 14 Sep 2018, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/knot-resolver shows: > > RM: This package has been requested to be removed. [...] > however, #908755 only requests removal of the *binary* pa

Bug#792566: tracker.debian.org: please show source (and binary) dependency satisfaction problems

Hi, On Thu, 13 Sep 2018, Johannes Schauer wrote: > if this is desired, then I can do the same thing for source package package > build dependencies, yes. > > I just didn't want to do all at once because I didn't know how this feature > would be received. > > Would you like me to make another mer

Bug#792566: tracker.debian.org: please show source (and binary) dependency satisfaction problems

Hi, On Thu, 16 Jul 2015, Johannes Schauer wrote: > at qa.d.o/dose, daily dependency satisfaction tests are performed on all > packages in Debian unstable and testing for main, contrib and non-free > each for binary packages as well as for source packages. > > It would be great if any issues about

Re: What criterion is used for "has autopkgtest and migrates to testing in 2 days"?

On Wed, 12 Sep 2018, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi > > On 12-09-18 18:35, Niels Thykier wrote: > > We should probably have *some* marker in tracker for this case. > > I think tracker is just slow at picking up new packages for excuses. > https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=r-cran-snakecase should

Bug#908457: bug counter wrong

Control: severit -1 minor Control: forcemerge 904841 -1 On Mon, 10 Sep 2018, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: > the all counter add the bugs from the patch counter. > Patch is only a tag and the bug is also counted in one > of the severities counters. Already reported in #904841. A simple fix for anyone

Bug#907923: tracker.debian.org: team pages: action needed title field includes HTML tags

Hi, On Tue, 04 Sep 2018, Paul Wise wrote: > I noticed that on team pages the title field of the "action needed" > tags in the VCS column include bold HTML tags but browsers do not > render these as bold in the popup that appears on mouse hover, > instead they show the literal HTML from the field.

Bug#907338: tracker.debian.org: confusion between keyword and keywordall

Hi, On Tue, 28 Aug 2018, shirish शिरीष wrote: > The point being I didn't know for what packages I have I have > what subscriptions. > > For e.g. I like dpkg, apt and some packages and like to know > what bugs have been caught there etc. but not necessarily all others. You may want to use the web

Bug#907338: tracker.debian.org: confusion between keyword and keywordall

Hi, On Sun, 26 Aug 2018, shirish शिरीष wrote: > According to https://qa.pages.debian.net/distro-tracker/usage/mailbot.html > one can interact with the tracker via email, while some parts work, > some parts don't . > > I tried using keywordall but for some reason that didn't work. Is this > to be u

Bug#856282: ARIA should be used to communicate the status of collapsable content under the Action Needed heading to assistive technologies

Control: tag -1 + moreinfo Hello, On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 08:22:52 -0500 am_d...@fastmail.fm wrote: > Currently, when selecting the Toggle Details buttons with a screen > reader like gnome-orca, nothing is spoken as the content after these > buttons in the DOM expands or collapses. I suggest adding t

Bug#906963: keyword subscription does not always work

On Sun, 26 Aug 2018, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Are you observing the same thing? I identified the problem. It's in the javascript, the code is badly using jquery to find out the list of keywords. I have a fix locally but I want to polish it further before releasing it and I'd like

Bug#906963: keyword subscription does not always work

Control: severity -1 important Hi, On Wed, 22 Aug 2018, Marc Haber wrote: > I would like to get the vcs messages, so I click on "Modify Keywords", > and am surprised that everything is ticket there. Regardless on which > change I make here, after clicking on "Save changes", nothing changes, > nei

Bug#893995: Include searchable provides data alongside binaries in tracker

Hi, On Sun, 25 Mar 2018, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Currently provides data is missing from tracker.Debian.org > > For example ruby-flipper provides ruby-flipper-active-record but this > information is missing currently from tracker.Debian.org Can you be more specific in your request? provides is

Bug#907075: tracker.debian.org: please report outstanding merge requests if Vcs- fields point to salsa

Control: tag -1 + confirmed On Thu, 23 Aug 2018, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > I just noticed that some debian packaging projects i've worked on that > are hosted on salsa are starting to accumulate merge requests via the > gitlab interface. > > https://tracker.debian.org does a good job of collec

Re: Bug#847125: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch04.en.html#pkg-tracker-commands doesn't seem to be anymore :(

Hi Shirish, you sent your email to a completely unrelated bug report. I'm replying on the debian-qa mailing list to avoid polluting the bug report. On Fri, 24 Aug 2018, shirish शिरीष wrote: > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch04.en.html#pkg-tracker-commands > doesn't seem

Bug#906954: tracker.debian.org: incorrect DUCK last update time

Hi, On Wed, 22 Aug 2018, Christian Göttsche wrote: > The URL(s) for this package had some recent persistent issues low > DUCK reports some issues concerning upstream URLs defined for this package. > Created: 2018-06-10 Last update: 2018-08-22 15:01 > > But when visiting the issues link, the page s

Bug#816733: PTS doesn't understand RFS bugs

hecked a few packages listed on https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=sponsorship-requests;dist=unstable For example https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/raphael or https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/cplay So it seems that the ITA or O entry is taking precedence and is hiding the RFS one. Just confi

Bug#816733: PTS doesn't understand RFS bugs

Control: severity -1 wishlist Control: retitle -1 tracker.debian.org: please show sponsorship requests On Fri, 04 Mar 2016, Jakub Wilk wrote: > https://packages.qa.debian.org/o/openfst.html says: > > The WNPP database contains an entry for this package, but it is unclear > > what kind of entry it

Bug#899405: tracker: Default documentation is not user-oriented

Hi, On Thu, 24 May 2018, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Definitely! This is now even more needed because we have a few interesting > team-oriented features that really need to be documented. > > I would like https://qa.pages.debian.net/distro-tracker/ to provide > user-oriented documen

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >