pc64el openqa-worker
packages, if you have somewhere to run a ppc64el worker.
So far, I've only been running the workers on the same machine as the
main software, so I would guess that we may bump into issues with running
external workers, but that's how OpenQA normally runs, so it should
On Wed, 06 Dec 2017, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Philip Hands:
>> Having jenkins in the mix makes things at least twice as painful.
>
> I would certainly never recommend *developing* such tests directly on
> Jenkins. At Tails we develop tests locally and use Jenkins only
&
On Tue, 05 Dec 2017, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi fil,
>
> On Fri, 24 Nov 2017, Philip Hands wrote:
>> If you look here:
>>
>> https://openqa.debian.net/
>>
>> You'll see that I've been testing d-i daily images for a while.
>>
&
On Sun, 03 Dec 2017, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> (dropping debian-boot@ and adding debian-edu@l.d.o to the recipients,
> and leaving context for the latter...)
>
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 01:35:41PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
>> If you look here:
>&g
ible to add tests without needing root
access to the machine (which is currently needed for some bits) so
please pester me about what you would like to test, and that will force
me to make it possible for you to do it without my intervention
(eventually ;-) ).
Cheers, Phil.
--
|)| Philip Hands [+44
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'd like to introduce Paul Adams of SiriusIT -- he's currently involved in
a European Commission funded project (called SQO-OSS) that's looking into
methods for mining various forms of data associated with Free Software, and
so deriving metrics th
> As soon as I have confirmation that the maintainers have
> indeed agreed to hand over control, I shall upload a new revision of
> the policy documents, with no changes except to the maintianer
> field.
I'll do it for you on debian-policy.deb if you like.
We're setting the maintainer t
7 matches
Mail list logo