ut every single one of xpuzzles' app-defaults files,
> although I'm pretty sure I haven't changed any of them
that's the problem. Asking about NOT changed upgraded conffiles. IMHO it's
the X upgrade, which moved everything from /usr/X11R6/lib/appdefaults into
/etc/X11/app-defaul
packages that violate this.
cool
> Anyone going to stop me?
no. But it seems to have problems with (libungif | giflib). This is/should be
allowed, no?
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phear my "Typical bloody smart-arse debian attitude."
#x27;t work
> with the installer which comes with Debian 2.2.
unfortunately. there is really no way around apart from using newer
realplayer installer. We don't control real.com
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL
the bugreport I think that adding
rm -f /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/dotfile/english//bytecompile
in prerm of all dotfile-* packages.
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ostscript interpreter
ii gsfonts-other5.10-2 Additional fonts for the ghostscript
interpreter
ii gsfonts-x11 0.12Make Ghostscript fonts available to X11.
With only gs&gs-pdfencrypt it doesn't.
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linu
it up.
>
> Matthias did great work. I have the new bash package compiled and will
> try if an upgrade from slink goes well. I will also try to upgrade a potato
Can you please upload it somewhere. I'm sure many people would like to try it
out.
Pe
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 10:13:51PM +1000 , Anthony Towns wrote:
> Hello world,
>
> I'm experimenting with a script to work out whether packages are
> installable or not. I figured the world at large might be interested in
> some of the results.
>
> The following packages are not installable (ie,
7 matches
Mail list logo
