Bug#477446: underlined links

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Since recently, packages.qa.debian.org and now qa.debian.org are the only web sites in the world that underline hyperlinks. This hurts my eyes. My browser can decide for itself when to underline links. Please change the revamp.css stylesheet to remove a

Matt Zimmerman appears to be Rarely In Action

The last upload that the PTS can attribute to Matt was 2005-01-20, and the packages that he maintains are growing worse in shape. At least the following packages need new maintainers: apt-listchanges (4 NMUs) dhcp (4 NMUs, comaintainer known to have retired) rrdtool (6 NMUs, comaintainer known

Stephen M Moraco appears to be Rarely In Action

I see that Stephen still makes uploads on some of his packages, but I strongly suggest that he give away some of them because they're in really bad shape. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Hijack or remove postgis

Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Something has to be done about the postgis package. There are RC > > bugs on uninstallability and FTBFS as well as several functionality > > bugs and two new upstream releases and no one se

Hijack or remove postgis

Something has to be done about the postgis package. There are RC bugs on uninstallability and FTBFS as well as several functionality bugs and two new upstream releases and no one seems to do anything. The packaging seems to be sufficiently ugly that it may be better to request removal and star

cdbs maintenance

As near as I can tell, nobody is maintaining cdbs anymore. The bugs and patches are evidently piling up. I have been trying over the last two months to get in contact with the listed maintainers to get me involved in helping with the maintenance, without much success. Most of these people ar

developer.php popcon display a little off

Thank you for your recent clarifications about the popcon display on developer.php. It seems, however, the the displayed numbers are a little random. They are apparently taken from some (arbitrary?) binary package associated with the given source package (e.g., glibc shows a popcon value of 8

Where's the popcon link?

I would like to protest the removal of the popcon link from the developer.php display. I think the "pool" link is significantly less useful. (Who needs that anyway?) What was the reason for this change? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Re: Watch column on developer.php outdated

I wrote: > I think the "watch" columns on developer.php have stopped updating > some time ago. I think this may have to do with queries on http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/ taking "forever". Perhaps the database has crashed or something?

Watch column on developer.php outdated

I think the "watch" columns on developer.php have stopped updating some time ago. I see several packages on "my" page[1] that show old version numbers although a direct uscan in the package build directory shows never versions available. Can someone check what's going on? [1] http://qa.debian

Looking for John R. Daily

I tried to contact John R. Daily on 2004-11-07 about the status of his package ldp-docbook-stylesheets, without response so far. This package has not seen activity in over two years in spite of upstream activity and has several wishlist bugs from the maintainer to himself. I don't seem to have

Bug#277289: ddpo: watch report for experimental packages never disappears

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal The watch report for experimental packages never disappears from the DDPO even after the packages are removed from the experimental distribution. For example, , still shows watch information for di

Bug#269493: developer.php: fault in watch version comparison

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal The magenta color coding of the watch column indicates that it thinks that the upstream version "1.0.00.004-2" is greater than the current Debian package version "1.0.00.004-2+cvs20040825-1". This doesn't match dpkg --compare-versions. See

Re: Debian Package for Perl Net::Server

Michael Bell wrote: > we tried to contact the maintainer of libnet-server-perl for a while. > We tried this via email and IRC but we were not able to contact him. > Are you able to contact him? The package is already orphaned and has an ITA for it. An updated package is being prepared as I write

Bug#261644: developer.php: merge watch and wwiz columns

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist In the interest of horizontal space saving and reducing the clutter on developer.php, please merge the watch and wwiz columns. If the package provides a valid watch file, then there is no point in showing the wwiz information, since that adds no informati

Bug#261645: developer.php: watch error details missing

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Example: Go to http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] For the package "pinentry", the column "watch/upstream unstable" shows an error. A click on "Details" leads to http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/maintainer.php?name=pinentry which shows nothing a

Re: developer.php getting a bit biiig

Igor Genibel wrote: > I thought about that but I'have the same impression than Andreas on > developer.php: it is very useful to have a good overview. To save some space, it should be enough to have one column related to the "watch" information: use the watch file in the package if available, els

Re: Bug#228394: marked as done (qa.debian.org: Adding a "upstream version" column in the developer.php page would be nice)

Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Your message dated Sun, 25 Jul 2004 15:53:49 +0200 > with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > and subject line Upstream version is now available in developer.php > has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This is all very nice, but now I need three