On Sun, 2024-10-27 at 00:43 +0200, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
> it seems to me that it'd be useful to write down some criteria to use as
> guidance on how to decide where new checks should be implemented, to avoid
> duplication.
Checks that can only happen after install such as cross-pack
On Wed, 2024-03-06 at 09:59 +0100, benoit Rolland wrote:
> When using Xfce remotely,
>
> a kind of Gnome timeout occurs after a few minutes.
Please contact our support channels for help using Debian:
https://www.debian.org/support
They will be able to help you figure out this issue and
direct
On Wed, 2024-03-06 at 11:22 -0500, Ali Ramzan wrote:
> We are currently using Debian Apache version 2.4.57-2, which has some
> vulnerabilities (Apache 2.4.x < 2.4.58 Multiple Vulnerabilities CVE-
> 2023-31122 CVE-2023-43622 CVE-2023-45802). I am trying to find out
> when the new version of Apache
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
piuparts is extracting data about dpkg alternatives for every package
it tests. It would be nice to have the data imported into UDD and
the results presented in a CGI on the UDD website.
https://piupar
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: carnivore
X-Debbugs-CC: m...@qa.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
The carnivore system which tracks the activity of Debian members is
written in Python 2, which has been removed from Debian, so carn
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 15:05:24 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> What could work is:
> run lintian on source
> for each arch in the packages's architectures (except all)
> run lintian on architecture packages + architecture 'all' packages
>
> But would that solve all issues?
I discovered that
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
The UDD list of BTS binary packages for the PTS started outputting some
incorrect package names. I am not sure if these are caused by bad data
in the BTS itself or if something has broken in the UDD datab
On Mon, 2023-08-21 at 02:04 +, Mae Miller wrote:
> Hi, I'm a longtime linux user but I'm getting oriented to the debian
> community and I was wondering what projects needed new eyes?
Pretty much every aspect of Debian (and FOSS) needs contributors.
We document most of the different ways to h
On Sat, 2023-07-15 at 10:58 +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> The version of dose-distcheck installed on quantz is very old (5.0.1-12,
> form oldoldstable). The version in bookworm is 7.0.0-1+b2. I can't tell
> yet whether more recent versions of dose fix the problem, but do you have
> plans for upgrad
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: important
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: dose
X-Debbugs-CC: Ralf Treinen
The dose cron job has been producing these errors since 2023-07-02:
Subject: Cron nice -15 flock -n
/srv/qa.debian.org/lock/dose-job /srv/qa.debian.org/data/cronj
On Sun, 2023-05-07 at 10:53 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> These are intentional. There are usually also Affects on some binary
> packages built from that source. The FTBFS makes the packages in sid
> uninstallable (due to dependencies on no longer available packages) and
> I want piuparts to
attached the list of added bugs and their subjects.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
From b92ac52e895bf7f251511c34503ff1e406718f42 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Wise
Date: Sun, 7 May 2023 00:02:15 +
Subject: [PATCH] Import 2023-05-07 00:02:15+00:00
---
debian-qa
On Tue, 2023-04-25 at 12:04 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> For those like me who haven't heard of it:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/codesearch-cli
An alternative is apparently dcs-cli by Jakub Wilk:
https://github.com/jwilk/dcs-cli
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debia
On Mon, 2023-04-24 at 19:53 +0200, Patrice Duroux wrote:
> codesearch-cli
For those like me who haven't heard of it:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/codesearch-cli
It isn't in Debian as far as I can tell.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a d
On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 17:12:09 -0400 Federico Grau wrote:
> Copying sf reply to Debian bug #1033632 , as requested by pabs, to enable
> Debian members to analyze.
>
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 08:35:03AM -0600, SourceForge.net Support & Ops wrote:
...
> > We've checked our logs for the past week and s
On Tue, 2023-04-18 at 21:55 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> I'm pasting here the piuparts bug template for this specific error
For future reference, here are the bug templates:
https://piuparts.debian.org/templates/mail/
https://piuparts.debian.org/templates/mail/fails_to_purge_-_command_deluse
Control: retitle -1 qa.debian.org: sourceforge redirector for debian/watch
files gets rate limited
On Thu, 2023-04-13 at 07:05 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I added code to handle sf.net's rate limiting in the UDD importer, and
> triggered a refresh of all sf.net-hosted packages.
Excellent, th
On Wed, 2023-04-12 at 07:14 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> There's specific code in the UDD uscan wrapper[1] to handle github's
> rate limiting. We could have something similar for either sf.net, or the
> sf.net redirector. Before I work on that, it would be great if someone
> could change the sf.
On Wed, 2023-03-29 at 08:05 +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> For several days sf.php no longer works:
>
> ,
> > uscan warn: In watchfile debian/watch, reading webpage
> > https://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php/synfig/ failed: 500 Error
> `
This issue is caused by the underlying SourceFor
On Sun, 2023-03-19 at 20:49 +0100, Patrice Duroux wrote:
> Sorry maybe I wasn't clear enough, but my purpose was more to track packages
> facing such cases (a subset of my first pattern):
>
> chiark-scripts: /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/fishdescriptor/__init__.py
Please file a feature reques
On Fri, 2023-03-17 at 16:22 +0300, Anatoliy Gunya wrote:
> omega-rpg package has the desktop file without a required field. I've
> prepared a fix for this bug at [1]. Is it possible to fix this package
> in the Bookworm release?
Since this change probably doesn't meet the freeze policy,
I think
On Sun, 2023-02-26 at 17:02 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I added the required support in tracker.debian.org
Personally I think we should replace the Ubuntu panel with a patches
panel, as I have done for the old PTS some years ago:
https://packages.qa.debian.org/g/glibc.html
This bug lists so
On Thu, 2023-02-16 at 01:17 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> it would need to get the list of binary packages for a source and
> lint all of them with the same lintian call.
The usual way of running lintian after a build checks all binary
packages and the source at the same time. I think UDD should
On Sat, 2023-01-14 at 18:41 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> I otherwise do not know how we can mark patches as forwarded when
> for example you send them directly to upstream via email or to a mailing
> list that has no public archive or similar.
Just as you can mark a BTS bug as forwarded to an em
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 13:38:28 +0800 Paul Wise wrote:
> I would like to have a patches panel on the distro-tracker
The UDD database now contains analysis and metadata for the Debian
patches, so it might be useful to link to that instead where possible.
https://lists.debian.org/msgid-sea
On Sun, 2023-01-08 at 18:58 +0100, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> I've added it now via
> https://salsa.debian.org/pkgutopia-team/debian-asgen-config/-/commit/4382a6c3aece0eef0c6f2c05279d61aa667ab601
> , so this issue should resolve itself very soon!
Could you add this hardcoding of suites, component
On Sat, 2023-01-07 at 21:47 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I will file proper bugs for tracker and developer.php integration in
> a few days.
There is a proposal for a tracker patches panel:
https://bugs.debian.org/779400
I implemented it for the old PTS fairly easily, for eg:
https://packages
On Sun, 2023-01-01 at 15:48 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> I could be wrong, but my interpretation of the highlighted sentence
> is that refusal to try X to see that Y happens does not count
> as "unreproducible".
Agreed.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description
Control: reopen -1
On Sat, 2022-12-24 at 09:04 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> OK, I imported ports to ports_* tables.
Thanks, but they don't appear to have any data yet and
the derivatives tables still have ports data in them.
https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/madison.cgi?package=chromium-bsu&table
On Thu, 2022-12-22 at 15:25 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> 1/ looking into it, I noticed that the source for packages in unreleased
> is not shipped. Is that expected?
This is a long-standing issue with the ports mini-dak setup.
The source packages are actually present in the archive but
there a
On Fri, 2022-12-23 at 15:28 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Fixed (at least partially).
Thanks. I've added support to madison.cgi and sent an rmadison patch:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/qa/commit/b259045e60b6f6f0f2f0b46d3c4f0d74afc3cf52
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/devscripts/-/merge_requests/
On Sat, 2022-12-10 at 11:49 +0100, Roland Clobus wrote:
> Since a few days all (non-archived) bugs, that have been reported by
> Philip Hands or me by looking at the output of openQA [1], have
> gotten usertags.
> You can find the list at [2].
I have updated our documentation about Debian QA use
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
The listing of the kbtin testing-autorm also lists the colorized-logs
binary package but kbtin in testing has no colorized-logs binary since
it was split out of the kbtin source between stretch and buster
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
X-Debbugs-CC: Thorsten Glaser
The UDD archived_* tables for archive.d.o/debian-archive/ are empty
even though config is available for importing the debian-archive mount.
Julien Cristau noted that script
On Thu, 2022-09-29 at 06:52 +0800, Adrian Gallo wrote:
> I have read your website and am keen to join the Debian QA team.
Excellent and welcome to Debian!
> There are a lot of options to help out.
Indeed, most of them are mentioned on these pages:
https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org
https://
On Wed, 07 Sep 2022 22:18:37 +0200 Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Perhaps www/bin/other_to_xml.py throws errors?
There aren't any errors visible in cron AFAICT.
PS: as mentioned before, the PTS is essentially abandoned.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
X-Debbugs-CC: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , Aurelien Jarno
Currently the unofficial Debian ports archive is imported in UDD tables
named 'derivatives', but these days it is more of a Debian subproject.
On Tue, 2022-08-23 at 00:17 +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> There used to be a box (or something, I mostly use this with lynx)
> for testing migration status, but it’s apparently now missing.
The cron job has been crashing since the release team changed the
format of the HTML excuses page.
Fr
On Thu, 2022-08-11 at 17:25 -0400, Lucas Krupinski wrote:
> My problem is with the Debian 11.4 Live Image installer.
...
> If QA isn’t the correct list to submit this to, I would appreciate it
> someone could point me to a more appropriate list?
Please ask about this on the debian-live mailing li
On Tue, 2022-07-19 at 16:29 +0300, Dayana wrote:
> I want to join your team as a QA,
> I have no experience as a QA,
> but I would be happy to help.
Please take a look at our web and wiki pages:
https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/Join
https://qa.debian.org/
https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.o
On Sun, 2022-07-03 at 15:51 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> TLDR: I have plans to get fresh archive-wide data about lintian results
> in UDD (and then to any service that wants to consume it), but it's
> still WIP
This mail reminds me somewhat of buxy's debusine proposal/work.
> - coordinate the
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
When the Vcs-* links still point to alioth, instead of keeping the now
broken links, the tracker could point at alioth-archive.d.o instead.
Here is an example of a package that still has alioth Vcs-* fields:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ion
Th
On Sun, 2022-05-29 at 23:29 +0100, Keiran Harcombe wrote:
> What would the process be for picking up the maintenance of the
> following packages on Debian; freedink, freedink-data, freedink-
> dfarc, freedink-dfarc-dbg, freedink-engine
This is documented in various places, but in short, rename t
On Fri, 2022-04-29 at 17:04 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Yes, verifying signatures using obsolete keys or obsolete algorithms
> which are no longer supported in GnuPG 2.
and nothing other than GnuPG 1 supports these keys? It seems like it
would be a good idea for GnuPG 2 or other OpenPGP implemen
On Fri, 2022-04-29 at 17:33 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> I expect some people who who keep GnuPG 1.4 around for handling some
> weird legacy archival data to be upset by this. If there are specific
> needs, perhaps we can find other ways that they can meet them safely.
> Or, perhaps they w
On Sat, 2022-02-26 at 10:52 +0530, Anish Kumbhar wrote:
> I am Anish Devendra Kumbhar, 1 st Year B.Tech student in CSE.
> I know C and C++, and am learning web development and python.
> I am really curious to know about open source and its contribution process.
> This will be my first experience
On Mon, 2021-12-27 at 18:13 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> It's phrased as question, not as you say. And I can certainly change the
> wording but then it's no longer an "action item" and I find it hard to
> keep the entry in its current place. Thus I prefer to restrict the cases
> where we show i
On Tue, 2021-12-07 at 09:44 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> When the List-Archive header exists and contains a URL, the link could
> be to that URL. This works for Debian lists and mailman lists and
> probably other types of lists too.
PS: I note that the mailman3 archiver uses Archived-A
On Tue, 2021-12-07 at 09:23 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> The tracker doesn't receive emails via mailing lists, it gets sent a
> direct copy from the various services.
Ah. That is the case for Debian but maybe not for other instances,
so I think this could be useful for some distros eventually.
On Mon, 2021-12-06 at 21:56 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Why do you want a lists.debian.org link when you already have a
> tracker.debian.org link pointing to the same content?
I don't want a tracker.d.o link. Mainly I want a link with a Message-ID
in it, which are more likely to be long-term
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Currently the only place that testing migration mails are publicly
archived is on the tracker.debian.org news section. There are probably
other mails in a similar situation. It would be nice to be able to go
from such a mail in local email archives di
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
In the news emails, please show the Message-ID header and make the
value inside the angled brackets <> a link to the Debian lists
msgid-search. For example [1] should link to [2].
1.
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1284147/accepted-purple-discord
On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 8:24 PM s3v wrote:
> Can you please manually remove cruft packages from the archive so that
> translators can concentrate on the *real* descriptions without wasting
> their time in translating old descriptions?
The source packages have no descriptions, only binary packages
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 4:51 AM Armando Marcos Peña Sejas wrote:
> SOLICITO LISTA DE PAQUETES DE DEBIAN.
Please contact our support services for help using Debian.
[Traducción automática] Póngase en contacto con nuestros servicios de
soporte para obtener ayuda sobre el uso de Debian.
https://ww
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 8:17 PM Davide Prina wrote:
> So, for example, in PTS (or in a bug report) can be reported to the DD:
> 1) that the package home page has some problem
> 2) a possible solution (in the repology page above)
There is already a bug report about this. In short, this isn't
possib
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 11:12 AM Russell Coker wrote:
> https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=russell%40coker.com.au
>
> In the above page it has both versions 2:2.20210203-3 and 2:2.20210203-4 in
> the testing and unstable columns, what does that mean?
I see 2:2.20210203-3 in the testing colu
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 11:24 PM Scott C. MacCallum wrote:
> I'm available to help.
Excellent, thanks for your interest!
Debian has a lot of different QA related tools and services you could work on:
https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org
Probably the highest impact one is lintian, a tool for
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 2:51 PM Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> remember that tracker is source-based
...
> supports package lookup prefixed with src: or bin:
...
> I would honestly oppose "hiding" and old source package
I think that makes this a wontfix bug, any further thoughts?
--
bye,
pabs
https:/
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 12:07:35 +0800 Paul Wise wrote:
> In the links panel please add at the end an "Other distros" or "Other
> distro packages" link (with title "provided by Repology") pointing at
> the packages list for the Repology project corresponding
Control: tags -1 - wontfix
Control: retitle -1 DDPO: hide Extra-Source-Only packages by default,
add option to show them
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 6:00 AM Paul Wise wrote:
> The version in experimental is ESO, so I think it is fine to hide it by
> default, perhaps with a parameter to sh
On Sun, 2020-09-27 at 14:54 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> I think above perfectly explains why the original issue of the ticket
> occurs, and it's by design.
> So I add the "wontfix" tag to this ticket.
The version in experimental is ESO, so I think it is fine to hide it by
default, perhaps with
On Sun, 2020-09-27 at 14:27 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> I think this can explain why an old version of package is still in
> archive, but still cannot explain why it appears in *experimental*
> column in DDPO page.
This simply because DDPO just reflects what is in the archive, if you
grep the P
On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 1:57 PM Roger Shimizu wrote:
> So what's ESO?
A package which has this in the Packages file:
Extra-Source-Only: yes
dak uses this to indicate that the source package is only kept around
for license compliance purposes because another package still has a
Built-Using heade
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 4:37 PM Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Would it make sense to standardize the current proposal as DEP-12, perhaps
> with
> a limited set of uncontroversial and widely used fields?
I wonder if storing metadata (including Homepage, debian/watch,
debian/upstream/*) about the upstre
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 7:12 AM Nicholas Tsimerekis wrote:
> I've been trying to find an opportunity to contribute to the Debian project.
There are many places to contribute and many things that need doing,
some are documented here:
https://www.debian.org/intro/help
https://wiki.debian.org/how-c
On Sun, 2020-06-28 at 18:17 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> That would be easy. What should that API look like? Would returning all
> the info for a given source package, as json, be enough?
Probably just the same API as the existing rmadison APIs. Since there
is already a udd madison script, prob
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 4:18 PM Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Then, I'd argue that that's one valid case for the package to stay in
> the main archive instead. I.e. use a manually build -dbg package.
>
> But this is just my own opinion, I don't think there is anything
> resembling a rule on matters reg
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 9:56 AM Bill Allombert wrote:
> "Package has a Suggests on pari-gp-dbgsym which cannot be satisfied on amd64"
>
> However pari-gp-dbgsym exists in buster-debug
>
> So is it a debcheck bug or something that can be fixed in the package ?
It is a bug in debcheck, it does not
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 2:15 PM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Unfortunately I need to do a manual install anyway, I don't have root
> access on the UDD machine and thus cannot install a .deb.
Another option would be to ask DSA to install the backport once it
reaches buster-backports.
--
bye,
pabs
ht
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
sources.debian.org shows the source code of packages available in all
releases going back to hamm. For removed packages that were in releases
hamm or later it would be useful to have the "browse source code" link
available for folks who are working on
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 5:09 PM Holger Levsen wrote:
> The information we would like to have integrated into tracker.d.o is a
> link to .buildinfo files for source packages, based on the architecture
> the build was done.
...
> https://buildinfos.debian.net/buildinfo-pool/ provides a pool structur
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 12:07:35 +0800 Paul Wise wrote:
> https://repology.org/tools/project-by?repo=debian_$suite&name_type=srcname&target_page=project_versions&name=$srcpkg
I think we also want the noautoresolve=on parameter to "Disable the
automatic ambiguity resolution (e.g.
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Repology is a project that monitors a huge number of package
repositories and other sources comparing packages versions across them
and gathering other information. It shows you in which repositories a
given project is packaged, which version is the l
On Sun, 06 May 2018 12:14:21 +0800 Paul Wise wrote:
> so once Repology pull request #615 (adding per-package problem
> reports) is merged and deployed on the repology website
The PRs haven't been merged but they have been closed and further
discussion has moved to this issue:
https:/
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 7:30 PM Patrice Duroux wrote:
> Regarding DUCK it seems not to be very active looking there:
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/duck
> and its VCS is not responding.
> Perhaps I will consider another Debian tool then...
The maintainer is still active and responds to email, s
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 10:39 AM Patrice Duroux wrote:
> I also working on a tool that tries checking (and suggest updates) to a given
> list of URLs: bad links, different cases of redirections, replacing http by
> https, etc.
There are a lot of these sorts of tools (DUCK is the main one as you k
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 7:51 PM Patrice Duroux wrote:
> As a companion for instance to the Debian Trends and the Debian Janitor, here
> is
> a small prototype/proposal to facilitate going through a list of packages that
> have passed a packaging expiration date in some way. To be more precise, it
Hi Simon,
I see duck.debian.net is down, the web server gives connection refused.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 4:21 PM Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Those are binary packages that the glibc source package can build but that
> it only builds on non-release architectures... so indeed the binary
> packages are unknown by packages.debian.org which only knows about
> packages available on off
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: normal
The fixtures reference testing/updates but with bullseye that suite has
been renamed to testing-security. The fixtures in the code need to be
updated and then updated on the live server. I've no idea how to do the
latter, which is why I'm filing this is
On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 3:42 PM Ulrike Uhlig wrote:
> Do you know why this is happening and what to do about it?
> It seems to me that the machine on which DMD runs is hosted at a US
> university [2]. Do you think it might be due to that? And if so, how can
> this be mitigated? Can this service ru
On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 5:03 AM Stephen Gelman wrote:
> It seems that the "Missing Man Pages Project" [1] linked to from the missing
> manpages qa page [2] is no longer an active project. The project page linked
> is gone (and seems to have been gone since 2013 at least) and I can't seem to
>
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 13:10:42 + Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 09:19:14PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 6:20 PM Holger Levsen wrote:
> [tracker.d.o tells me that]
> > > - new upstream version only available in experimental (yes, beca
On Thu, 2019-06-06 at 10:20 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> - new upstream version only available in experimental (yes, because
> buster is frozen)
Do you have an example of a package where this should be hidden?
I'd like to see the issue in context to understand it more clearly.
--
bye,
pabs
On Sat, 2019-06-15 at 13:06 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Here's a draft of what it could look like, does this satisfy the
> requirements?
I think I would put the planned_release into the stages.
I wonder if the set of stages and their meaning will be the same for
every release, i.e. should
On Fri, 2019-06-14 at 16:13 -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> Should dm.txt file be downloaded and read once a day?
> (to update/save new info)
I note there is already code in RetrieveDebianMaintainersTask that
downloads and processes dm.txt so perhaps that should be used.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wi
Holger Levsen wrote:
> package: tracker.debian.org
> severity: wishlist
> x-debbugs-cc: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
>
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 09:19:14PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 6:20 PM Holger Levsen wrote:
> [tracker.d.o tells me that]
> >
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 8:30 PM Adam Borowski wrote:
> Thus, could you please put all release archs first, -ports later?
I'd suggest also greying out the non-release arches somehow, similar
to what buildd.debian.org does but perhaps greying out the status
symbols instead.
--
bye,
pabs
https://
On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 6:20 PM Holger Levsen wrote:
> - (build-)depends on orphaned packages
I guess you don't want to see this because you have enough to work on already.
I think that this could be disabled when one is logged in as someone
who is maintainer of more than X packages or more than
On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 9:35 PM Holger Levsen wrote:
> I'm already (mildly) annoyed by some unactionable action items on some
> of my packages and if the ratio of actionable and unactionable items
> because too bad I will eventually stop paying attention to all of them,
> which would be rather sad.
Hi all,
The release for Debian buster is coming soon. Please ensure that the
debian.org meta-package for your service is installable in buster and
that your service will work on Debian buster based systems.
https://salsa.debian.org/dsa-team/mirror/debian.org
Here is the list of package removals
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
In addition to the LowThresholdNmu wiki page, there is a corresponding
LowThresholdAdoption for packages that the maintainer wants to allow
others to adopt them if the package isn't being taken care of enough.
It would be nice to add support for it i
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
In addition to the LowThresholdNmu wiki page, there is a corresponding
LowThresholdAdoption for packages that the maintainer wants to allow
others to adopt them if the package isn't being taken care of enough.
It would be nice to add support for it i
On Thu, 2019-03-14 at 07:22 +, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> So is this firefox-esr issue
Only to the extent that Firefox has a terrible UI around all parts of
its support for client certs, and the terrible error page confused you.
> something I, as a user need to do something to fix ?
Yes, you'll
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 4:30 PM Ryan Goodfellow wrote:
> I am the proud owner of a Thinkpad X1 that has just been bricked by a Debian
> recommended update visa-vis the Gnome software app and LVFS.
I'm sorry to hear that. Just for the record, Debian doesn't have any
influence over which firmware
On Thu, 2019-02-28 at 20:58 +0100, s3v wrote:
> I've searched around for "cruft" packages and, if I have understood
> correctly, all these are some kind of "phantom" packages that require
> manual intervention for an effective removal.
Right.
> I would like to ask you whether there is some tool
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 1:30 AM s3v wrote:
> I would like to ask you to clarify this situation:
>
> 1) linux-source-4.18 is in Translation-en.bz2 file [1] ...
> 2) ... but linux-source-4-18 is uninstallable in Sid
> 3) anyway linux-source-4.18 is shown as "active" by UDD :|
...
> All the packages
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 4:45 PM Ricardo Fraile wrote:
> I'm trying to find the meaning of the excuses that are exposed on the
> excuse page, as example, with lintian [1]:
I think it would be best to ask the release team about this.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 10:43 AM Hideki Yamane wrote:
> At
> https://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=fonts-sawarabi-mincho,
> it show as below but debhelper-compat (= 12) is satisfied in sid
>
> > BuildDepends
> >
> > Package declares a build time dependency on debhelper-compat
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: carnivore
Since 2018-10-26 the carnivore cron job has been printing:
From: Cron Daemon
To: cron-er...@qa.debian.org
Subject:Cron nice -15 flock -n
/srv/qa.debian.org/lock/carnivore /srv/qa.d
1 - 100 of 737 matches
Mail list logo
