Hi!
I was taking a look at the package "elmo" and I saw that it was last
uploaded by Jacek on 2004.
There are 7 bugs opened against elmo (some are easy to fix) and the
last upload was a NMU by Bastian Venthur. There is also a new upstream
release (version 1.3.2), but it's not reported to the BTS.
Hi!
(I am CCing Alexander)
On 3/28/06, Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the light of Alexander Schmehl's message in this thread on
> debian-qa in March 2005 you may want to adopt pngcrush as a first step.
Is the ITA (#353392) not active?
Alexander said on 23 Mar 2006:
"Howev
Hi!
On 3/25/06, Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 18:20 -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> > I still don't see good reasons to merge the 4 programs :-/
>
> It's of course always a tradeoff between the extra work of merging
> t
Hi!
On 3/24/06, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
>
> > The 4 programs are similar, but different. They are small too.
>
> If there is no chance to unify these algorithms in one single
> program using differen
f similar tools. It seemed to me, that no one else wanted it,
> > so I steped in.
>
> I'm sponsoring pngnq and pngquant for Nelson A. de Oliveira (CC).
> It might be reasonable to try to merge these three projects with
> similar functionality. Perhaps asking the upstream auth
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
I was taking a look at my packages on qa.debian.org and I saw that on
the field "Watch Unstable", of the package qsf, there was an "Error Details".
However, that watch file is valid!
$ uscan --verbose
-- Scanning for watchfiles in .
-- Found watchfile
/pool/main/b/biofox/biofox_1.1-2/changelog
it's possible to see that there is really a revision 1.1-2, however on
"Latest News" there is only "[2005-10-05] Accepted 1.1-1 in unstable (low)
(Nelson A. de Oliveira)".
Thank you
Nelson
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
ackage. And yes, that would
require his aproval.
If he was MIA (that is not the case), that would require the QA team
attention (because this, the first email was sent also to the QA
list).
Matthew is not MIA and I hope that the things are more clear now.
Thank you all and sorry for anything.
Regards
Nelson A. de Oliveira
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: minor
Hi!
The initial page of http://qa.debian.org/ says:
Both developers and users can help to make Debian a better system. The
Debian Project is currently working on a release of the next version,
codenamed sarge.
I think that this "sarge" on the end is outda
9 matches
Mail list logo
