Bug#931754: qa.debian.org: pass --debian to blhc

2019-07-09 Thread Michael Gilbert
package: qa.debian.org severity: normal The blhc results on the build log scanner pages at qa.debian.org indicate that most packages have missing pie flags now that gcc injects it automatically on most archs. Please use the new --debian flag, which was added to account for this [0]. Best wishes,

Bug#899113: tracker.debian.org: emails sent to '@tracker.d.o' are discarded

2018-05-19 Thread Michael Gilbert
package: tracker.debian.org severity: normal Similar to #891504, emails sent directly to a package tracker address, for example chromium-brow...@tracker.debian.org, are discarded instead of being relayed to those subscribed (to the 'contact' keyword). Other than this bug, @tracker.debian.org as t

sf.net redirector broken?

2015-05-30 Thread Michael Gilbert
Running uscan on packages using the sf.net redirector will results in: $ uscan --verbose --report uscan warning: In debian/watch, no matching hrefs for watch line http://sf.net/wine/wine-(.+)\.tar\.bz2 -- Scan finished This are also also a lot of broken dehs pages: http://dehs.alioth.debian.or

Bug#776521: UDD can think removed packages are still in testing/unstable

2015-01-28 Thread Michael Gilbert
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: udd UDD thinks src:eglibc is still in testing/unstable, but it's been removed for a while, so it shouldn't show up in the RC bug list: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/bugs/?release=jessie_and_sid&patch=ign&merged

Re: dm upload permissions

2012-11-17 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 2:29 AM, Bart Martens wrote: > Hello, > > As I wrote earlier on debian-devel [1] I have a few reports [2] about DM > upload > permissions. According to the announcement [3] the permissions "only via > DMUA=yes" will be revoked on 24th of November 2012, and that date is com

Re: Hijacking^W^W^W^W^W^WSalvaging packages for fun and profit: A proposal

2012-10-10 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > So, reading this thread (which was surprisingly quiet, given the topic), > it seems that everybody agrees that such a procedure would be a good > thing (nobody had fundamental concerns). But now we have two proposed > procedures: > - one wh

Bug#647708: qa.debian.org: madison.php missing lenny suite

2011-11-05 Thread Michael Gilbert
package: qa.debian.org severity: important Hi, It seems that the madison.php [0] interface is currently lacking information about the lenny suite. However, it seems that lenny-security is still included. To reproduce this, try a query like "xpdf", which has a lenny version as can be seen on its