Bug#969311: UDD: please install pg_stat_statements extension

owner 969311 mba...@debian.org thanks On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:02:52AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > In order to best assess where and how to improve the situation, please > install the pg_stat_statements extension in the udd database, like > > CREATE EXTENSION pg_stat_stateme

Bug#969311: UDD: please install pg_stat_statements extension

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: udd Dear Maintainer, it seems some parts of the UDD schema are sub-optimal, e.g. some non-trivial tables are missing primary keys or indexes alltogether, resulting in many full table scans. In order to be

Bug#928942: Bug #928942: udd: cannot import database dump into PostgreSQL ("function release_name(text) does not exist")

ing it: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/blob/master/sql/udd-schema.sql#L553 cheers, Michael -- Michael Banck Projektleiter / Senior Berater Tel.: +49 2166 9901-171 Fax: +49 2166 9901-100 Email: michael.ba...@credativ.de credativ GmbH, HRB Mönchengladbach 12080 USt-ID-Nummer: DE204566209 Trompeterall

Bug#703402: PTS: link to the blends website for packages involved in blends

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 05:05:33PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Well, machine readable file is one thing. At first we need to define > the SQL table layout. Currently the philosophy in UDD is to have the > tables not normalised but I think it makes sense to normalise to some > extend into three

Re: Should we remove opensync?

Hi, On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 06:52:21PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote: > Opensync family of packages has accumulated a full of 21 RC bugs [1] without > any > comments from the maintainer. Furthermore, some of the packages block the > lafiles > release goal[2]. > > Looking at the list of packages: >

Re: BSP end of November

On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 11:13:20AM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > at the German LinuxWorldExpo last week we talked about organizing a > BSP end of November (we thought of 27. - 28. November, which is the > last weekend in November). Location is not yet defined, but Frankfurt > might be a good

NMU of gnome-pim in DELAYED/7-day, removing gnome-pim-conduits

with these decisions, please speak up in the next days and propose an alternative solution. I've attached the interdiff between 1.4.9-2 and 1.4.9-2.1. cheers, Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html diff -u gnome-pim-1.4.9

Bug squashing and d-i hacking in Munich, April 17/18th

[CC'd -boot and -qa to make them aware of this. Please drop them from the CC unless it's on topic on the respective list] In parallel to the next Debian-wide IRC BSP[1], a real-life hacking meeting will take place in Munich on the weekend of April 17/18th. Targets: The focus of the eve