Hi,
> I was asking for an interface for automated package testing on
> #debian-mentors, but there does not seem to be such an interface. What I
> was thinking about would be some kind of script being invoked before a
> package is installed or upgraded, after it is upgraded or installed and
> after
Hi,
> Indeed. Please see for instance
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=334697
This bugreport sounds like a joke, really.
If the goal isn't to 'not release apt-listbugs with etch',
this is going to be bad.
Note that the load for apt-listbugs is quite huge, and I doubt
qa.deb
Hi,
> apt-listbugs: 1308
> xawtv: 1540
These two look pretty important; tho' they both are not
well-maintained upstream.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Hi,
> >
> > Don't make "on vacation" public. It invites burglars in the DD's home.
>
> *Nacho prepares his picklock.
>
> Hehe, IIRC if you mark "On vacation" tick on db.d.o search conditions
> you get a list of developers which are "on vacation" too.
Thanks for finding a security hole.
Can w
severity 334454 serious
thanks
To me, that patch as specified in 322467 is not applied, so from a
casual reading, it looks like the security hole is open.
At Sat, 22 Jul 2006 01:04:31 +0200,
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
> * Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-21 23:49]:
Hi,
I think having a security hole for more than a year is a reason to remove
gpdf.
evince seems to be a replacement, gpdf is deprecated.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
Hi,
This surely would be interesting for pbuilder, so that users can do
distributed build-testing.
> - A data repository. Currently in /org/qa.debian.org/rebuildtesting/{db,pool}
> on merkel. This repository should get some smarter indices, but
> basicly, the pool structure is most flexible a
g after building the package.
new pbuilder package will be uploaded when may new key enters the
Debian keyring.
regards,
junichi
[1] http://www.livejournal.com/users/djpig/9260.html
--
Junichi Uekawa, Debian Developer http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/
183A 70FC 4732 1B87 57A5 CE82
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002 19:15:53 -0600
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:20:43PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Isn't it about time for another BSP? It's been a month; I see quite a
> > lot of RC bugs in the bts with patches.
>
> That might be worthwhile. Any QA people
build from b-f cvs on end of day 2/Dec/2001.
My impression running the "compact" image was that
the screen just keeps on flashing, when after busybox starts.
(under bochs).
But maybe something else is wrong on my setup.
Anyone successful ?
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PR
Package: sylpheed
Version: 0.6.3-0.1
It should build depend on
libgpgme-dev (>= 0.2.3)
as it seems to require it.
The binary uploaded to Debian was probably
not compiled with new enough version of libgpgme.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
Anthony Towns immo vero scripsit
> abiword 108986 open serious
> abiword 109580 open grave
I have been looking at this, and I know this package is effectively
unmaintained.
However, I realize I am not up to it.
Anyone?
regards.
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netfort
12 matches
Mail list logo
