Bug#727048: PTS: Please show warning for "auto-removal from testing"

2014-01-25 Thread Ivo De Decker
Cheers, Ivo >From de4549e5a4aecbf966bc2721cde3c8fe5ae653aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ivo De Decker Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 22:21:50 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] download testing autoremoval info --- www/bin/update_incoming.sh | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git

Bug#725321: [UDD]: Please make a "BTS might be confused" script/query

2013-10-06 Thread Ivo De Decker
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 08:43:08AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > I think it would be nice if we had some easy way to get a list of all > bugs where the BTS is (possibly) "confused", so we can easily resolve > those problems. Another one: A bug against multiple packages, which has found versions f

small bof about udd?

2013-08-14 Thread Ivo De Decker
Hi, Would anybody be interested in a small bof about udd at debconf? Cheers, Ivo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130814223212.gc14...@ugent.be

Bug#695508: udd: bugs.cgi - bugs filed against multiple packages is not associated with a source

2013-01-29 Thread Ivo De Decker
Hi, On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:23:55PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 29/01/13 at 22:49 +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote: > > Hi Lucas, > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 04:56:03PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > I've just applied your patch. Thanks! > >

Bug#695508: udd: bugs.cgi - bugs filed against multiple packages is not associated with a source

2013-01-29 Thread Ivo De Decker
Hi Lucas, On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 04:56:03PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > I've just applied your patch. Thanks! OK. Thanks. The links to the PTS in the cgi also need to be changed. I commit a fix for this. If someone can do a pull on the udd server, this bug can really be closed. Cheers, Ivo

Bug#695508: udd: bugs.cgi - bugs filed against multiple packages is not associated with a source

2013-01-05 Thread Ivo De Decker
of the necessary files can be empty or generated from other data, so I was able to do some basic testing, and I created a patch (attached) that should fix the import part of this bug. Cheers, Ivo commit 6d5d39cfc8b207ed14392a88ca4de042474c74d9 Author: Ivo De Decker Date: Sat Jan 5 20:35:39

Bug#695543: bugs.cgi: also show removal requests

2012-12-14 Thread Ivo De Decker
Control: retitle -1 bugs.cgi: show unblock and removal requests based on usertags Hi, On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:28:02AM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote: > In bugs.cgi the unblock requests are shown based on bugs against > release.debian.org that match '^unblock (package)'. A n

Bug#695772: bugs.cgi: allow filtering based on unblock/approve hints

2012-12-14 Thread Ivo De Decker
Hi, On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 05:01:28PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > > Please allow the possibility to filter bugs based on unblock or approve > > hints > > by the release team. The attached patch frovides these filters. > Good idea. :) > I'd probably merge them into one entry as "approve" is (

Bug#695772: bugs.cgi: allow filtering based on unblock/approve hints

2012-12-12 Thread Ivo De Decker
320c82d19c01c02b4d7ce9d5a195d9be4490cf46 Author: Ivo De Decker Date: Wed Dec 12 16:42:21 2012 +0100 allow filtering based on unblock and approve hints diff --git a/web/bugs.cgi b/web/bugs.cgi index 211f78d..3cd526b 100755 --- a/web/bugs.cgi +++ b/web/bugs.cgi @@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ FILTERS = [ ['rtwheezy

Bug#695543: bugs.cgi: show unblock requests based on usertags

2012-12-09 Thread Ivo De Decker
itle. They all (should) have an unblock usertag, so the unblock requests can be found based on that usertag. That way, more unblock can be found and displayed. The attached patch implements this. Cheers, Ivo commit 7c665b035744b477eda95f4ac7d9fa9d45cc428d Author: Ivo De Decker Date: Mon Dec 1

Bug#695508: udd: bugs.cgi - bugs filed against multiple packages is not associated with a source

2012-12-09 Thread Ivo De Decker
Hi Niels, On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 01:22:39PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > The bug #694368 is filed against libfuzzy2, libfuzzy-dev (src: > ssdeep). At least in the view [1], this means that the "package" > column gets the PTS link wrong. It links to p.qa.d.o/libfuzzy2 and > p.qa.d.o/libfuzzy-de