Hi Andreas,
thanks for your continued efforts on piuparts and reporting them to the
bts. I saw your recent report #1064893 on python3-pcpp and would like
you to change your bug template. We had an earlier discussion about this
on debian-de...@lists.debian.org starting at
https://lists.debian.org/2
Hi Andreas and Ralf,
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 04:08:48PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > Moving the usertag to the qa namespace sounds like a good idea.
>
> I agree
Thank you
> Sounds like a good idea. However, I do not think that usertags support
> a hierarchy of tags. So maybe different specif
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 03:34:38PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> ## Usertagging bugs
>
> In order to avoid filing duplicates, I need a usertagging scheme for
> bugs. Are there opinions on what user I should use for this? In the
> simplest instance, I can use my DD login. R
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: retitle -2 qa.debian.org: Please add cross build satisfiability in
summary
Control: block -1 by -2
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 05:22:12PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:57:52AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > https://tracker.debian.o
Hi,
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:57:52AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> https://tracker.debian.org/ has a link to the cross-buildability status
> of a package. It'd be useful to have a tick or cross on the
> https://qa.debian.org/developer.php page, e.g. in the CI/Rep column, as
> a link to the cro
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 11:42:31AM +1000, Stuart Prescott wrote:
> Policy is, however, silent on whether that is the correct behaviour or not.
> Clarifying policy as to what the correct behaviour should be seems to be a
> necessary first step. I would expect that policy would end up saying
> som
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: jenkins
I'd expect that setting DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck on a package build
should not change the resulting binary packages. It might make the build
succeed despite being broken, but if it succeeds without
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: debsources
http://sources.debian.net/src/openldap/latest/ gives you woody sources,
not sid sources. The reason is that the openldap version history is
non-monotonic (even considering epochs). There was a ti
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: jenkins.d.n
Hi Holger,
It would be nice if jenkins could run rebootstrap, a QA effort aiming to
test the very early stage for bootstrapping new and old architectures.
This is part of a larger goal called "
Control: merge 660170 -1
This is a duplicate. Sorry for the noise.
Helmut
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140130061929.GA31391@localhost
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-secur...@lists.debian.org
It would be nice to have UDD import parts of the secure-testing SVN
repository maintained by the Debian security team. The biggest benefit I
see is that it
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
It would be nice to be able to query Multi-Arch headers in udd. This
requires changing the schema which I have no clue about. After that it
should be a matter of moving Multi-Arch from "ignorable" to
"n
Hi,
(posting from outside, so please CC me)
I was asking for an interface for automated package testing on
#debian-mentors, but there does not seem to be such an interface. What I
was thinking about would be some kind of script being invoked before a
package is installed or upgraded, after it is
13 matches
Mail list logo
