Source: zeromq3
Version: 4.0.4+dfsg-1
Followup-For: Bug #791997
Hi,
it's been over a year now that this bug has been open, over 2 years
and 16 uploads since the maintainer change.
How hard is it to fix 2 lines in debian/control?
Note: The bug has been reported twice and not been merged.
MfG
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 08:20:47AM +0100, Christophe Siraut wrote:
> tags -1 moreinfo
> thanks
>
> Hi Goswin,
>
> > When I search for bugs on http://udd.debian.org/bugs/ I have to scroll
> > quite far down to the search button.
>
> There is another search button/link in the navigation bar, it ha
Package: udd.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
When I search for bugs on http://udd.debian.org/bugs/ I have to scroll
quite far down to the search button. When I click it the page reloads
and is at the begining again. So I have to scroll a long way down
again to see my search results.
It would be bet
Holger Levsen writes:
> Hi,
>
> while testing the archive with piuparts I found a failure reported by
> piuparts, that after purge /var/games existed on the system while it wasnt
> there before installing+purging the package.
>
> See http://piuparts.debian.org/squeeze/fail/slashem-common_0.0.7
Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 10:32:32PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Then I am reopening this bug but alter it to request the short
>> description as tooltip.
>
> allright, I see a problem here: PTS is source
Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Re: Filippo Giunchedi 2006-06-09 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Having it displayed as a tooltip (think of "alt" attribute of images) is not
>> going to require any javascript/css magic, or I am missing something?
>
> ... works.
>
> Christoph
> --
> [EMAIL PRO
Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> reopen 370087
> thanks
>
> Re: Debian Bug Tracking System 2006-06-09 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> Please include the packages description on packages.qa.debian.org.
>> >
>> > Why?
>
> Sorry for the late-to-the-party message - I'd like to strongly support
Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 12:42:30PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
>> FTBFS. All of those you can probably summarize under bit-rot. The
>> Debian-amd64 team has now started doing some aggressive porter NMUs
>> (policy all
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Moreover, looking at [1], there is a quite rather impressive list of
> package that FTBFS since ages, that are apparently unmaintained, and
> whose maintainer looks like to be MIA since more than a year (all
> packages are the same version as in sta
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I went through the RC bugs which apply to etch and are older than one year.
> This is a rather disturbing list, as you would expect from the age of the
> bugs.
> In most cases I don't think you can expect the maintainers to deal with these
> bugs on
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 08:47:08PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
>> > What I mean is that those bugs should be reassigned to
>> > "wnpp," so they show up in the wnpp and the packages bug log.
>>
>> Wouldn't it be easier/cleaner to modify debbugs
Bluefuture <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The dehs system now is regular running again every two days on alioth
> (and so also on the info feed to developer.php on qa).
> Looking at no_watch page[1] there are:
>
> Total source packages without watch file: 6324
> Total source packages: 8285
> %:
Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 23:15:53 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 04:58:56PM -0500, William Ballard wrote:
>>> Apparently the dickhead maintainer of ndiswrapper-source has just gone
>>> into his shell and refuses to discuss this
Bluefuture <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This are some idea for an advanced automatic Debian-qa system:
>
> The Debian-qa and debian devel could develop a system for trace all
> upstream version of a software using the Debian/Watch file and uscan
> tool and put this info in a db storing relase ve
t the Cc list. My AM probably
doesn't need to see your mail if you are not the DAM. restrict as fit.
==========
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi there.
>
> I was wondering in what stage my NM applicati
15 matches
Mail list logo