Bug#791997: zeromq3: git repository is no longer updated

2016-11-24 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Source: zeromq3 Version: 4.0.4+dfsg-1 Followup-For: Bug #791997 Hi, it's been over a year now that this bug has been open, over 2 years and 16 uploads since the maintainer change. How hard is it to fix 2 lines in debian/control? Note: The bug has been reported twice and not been merged. MfG

Bug#770028: Please skip to the found bugs when clicking search

2014-11-24 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 08:20:47AM +0100, Christophe Siraut wrote: > tags -1 moreinfo > thanks > > Hi Goswin, > > > When I search for bugs on http://udd.debian.org/bugs/ I have to scroll > > quite far down to the search button. > > There is another search button/link in the navigation bar, it ha

Bug#770028: Please skip to the found bugs when clicking search

2014-11-18 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: udd.debian.org Severity: wishlist When I search for bugs on http://udd.debian.org/bugs/ I have to scroll quite far down to the search button. When I click it the page reloads and is at the begining again. So I have to scroll a long way down again to see my search results. It would be bet

Re: does /var/games have to be deleted on purge? (if it's empty..)

2009-04-09 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Holger Levsen writes: > Hi, > > while testing the archive with piuparts I found a failure reported by > piuparts, that after purge /var/games existed on the system while it wasnt > there before installing+purging the package. > > See http://piuparts.debian.org/squeeze/fail/slashem-common_0.0.7

Bug#370087: marked as done (Please include the package description.)

2006-06-10 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 10:32:32PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> Then I am reopening this bug but alter it to request the short >> description as tooltip. > > allright, I see a problem here: PTS is source

Bug#370087: marked as done (Please include the package description.)

2006-06-09 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Re: Filippo Giunchedi 2006-06-09 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Having it displayed as a tooltip (think of "alt" attribute of images) is not >> going to require any javascript/css magic, or I am missing something? > > ... works. > > Christoph > -- > [EMAIL PRO

Bug#370087: marked as done (Please include the package description.)

2006-06-09 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > reopen 370087 > thanks > > Re: Debian Bug Tracking System 2006-06-09 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> Please include the packages description on packages.qa.debian.org. >> > >> > Why? > > Sorry for the late-to-the-party message - I'd like to strongly support

Re: amd64 uploads

2006-04-07 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 12:42:30PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > >> FTBFS. All of those you can probably summarize under bit-rot. The >> Debian-amd64 team has now started doing some aggressive porter NMUs >> (policy all

Re: amd64 uploads

2006-04-07 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Moreover, looking at [1], there is a quite rather impressive list of > package that FTBFS since ages, that are apparently unmaintained, and > whose maintainer looks like to be MIA since more than a year (all > packages are the same version as in sta

Re: Antique RC bugs (many about licensing)

2006-03-15 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I went through the RC bugs which apply to etch and are older than one year. > This is a rather disturbing list, as you would expect from the age of the > bugs. > In most cases I don't think you can expect the maintainers to deal with these > bugs on

Bug#293261: qa.debian.org: package bugs should also be against the package itself

2005-02-03 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 08:47:08PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote: >> > What I mean is that those bugs should be reassigned to >> > "wnpp," so they show up in the wnpp and the packages bug log. >> >> Wouldn't it be easier/cleaner to modify debbugs

Re: try to keep a watch file into your package

2005-01-24 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Bluefuture <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The dehs system now is regular running again every two days on alioth > (and so also on the info feed to developer.php on qa). > Looking at no_watch page[1] there are: > > Total source packages without watch file: 6324 > Total source packages: 8285 > %:

Re: Always run dpkg --dry-run -i before running dpkg -i!

2005-01-14 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 23:15:53 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 04:58:56PM -0500, William Ballard wrote: >>> Apparently the dickhead maintainer of ndiswrapper-source has just gone >>> into his shell and refuses to discuss this

Re: Proposal for an advanced Debian-QA system

2004-02-20 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Bluefuture <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This are some idea for an advanced automatic Debian-qa system: > > The Debian-qa and debian devel could develop a system for trace all > upstream version of a software using the Debian/Watch file and uscan > tool and put this info in a db storing relase ve

Ping for DAM, DAM is MIA? Mail alias broken?

2003-08-25 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
t the Cc list. My AM probably doesn't need to see your mail if you are not the DAM. restrict as fit. ========== Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi there. > > I was wondering in what stage my NM applicati