On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 01:26:31PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Something has to be done about the postgis package. There are RC
> > bugs on uninstallability and FTBFS as well as several functionality
> > bugs and two new upstream releases
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 08:02:32AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 09:47:59AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> * Marc Haber:
> >> > Having never really understood the rather sparsely documented apt.conf
> >> > syntax, I am reluctant to use apt to keep metadata current on a
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 01:51:52AM +0100, giskard wrote:
> hi,
>
> only one.sorry :(
> 04/09/2004 13:26
>
jvw asked for a bouncing, not (incomplete) forwarding...
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
severity 279898 important
thanks
Problem seems not easy reproducible. It requires more investigation
anyway.
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 09:42:28PM +0100, Daniele Cortesi wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 (17:09), Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > Package: autofs
> > Version: 4.1.3-4
> > Followup-For: Bug
: optional
Section: devel
Installed-Size: 276
Maintainer: Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: i386
Version: 6.22-6
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4)
Filename: pool/main/i/icmake/icmake_6.22-6_i386.deb
Size: 132960
MD5sum: 0a3fd21d5c01482a351f3f34ca1cd485
Description
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 11:44:50PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
> Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
>
> >http://www.mysql.com/products/licensing/foss-exception.html
> >
> >A few programs link currently the old non-GPL libmysqlclient10 in order
> >to retain compatibility with other free licenses which have
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 07:20:26PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> I would point out that while wmaker has 3 maintainers (John H. Robinson,
> IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin F. Krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) , no
> upload was performed since september.
>
I followed up a bug about current upstream v
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 03:25:01PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>
> Actually, there are a fair number of bugs languishing against ftp.debian.org
> because they're for removals from woody. I suppose that these don't belong
> as bugs against ftp.debian.org, and just clutter the bug list up -- t
reassign 214929 ftp.debian.org
severity 214929 wishlist
retitle 214929 Please remove mps - package is outdated
thanks
Mps and mtop are now included in openmosix usertools. This is an
outdated package of the old mosix days.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 08:37:30AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> The description lies; kernel-patch-evms was updated for 2.6.0 some time ago.
> Of course, 2.6.0 has known security problems, and 2.6.1 isn't in Debian yet.
>
Good point: security. We have a lots of dangerous pre-2.4.24 kernels
a
There are a few obsolete kernels/patches of 2.6, such as (i386 only):
kernel-doc-2.6.0-test11 - Linux kernel specific documentation for version
2.6.0-test11.
kernel-doc-2.6.0-test9 - Linux kernel specific documentation for version
2.6.0-test9.
kernel-headers-2.6.0-test11-1 - Header files related
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 07:22:51PM +0100, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> One of my sponsors asked me to do that some time ago.
> I thought it's a requirement. :)
The reason is practical: sometimes sponsoree 'disappears' misteriously :)
Having an easy tracking of who could contact him/her and followed th
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 10:09:13PM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> >
> > Not so many packages use the watch file.
>
> this is true, I opened [1] a thread exactly about this and why increasing the
> number of watch files is good, probably the best thing to do is to manually
> file
> bugs provid
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 07:56:58PM +0100, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
>
> As say in the title it would be nice to have a column with upstream version
> in
> the developep.php page (base on the debian/watch files as for the PTS
> webpages
> for packages). It could be a nice way to see which packag
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 11:01:11AM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, Me and fog will have problems to correct the broken scripts
> until 1/7, due to alioth status. And yes, current Grass solve copyright
> problems.
>
Ah that's good, just see
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 09:06:14AM +0100, Markus Neteler wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 06:41:37AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > Matthew> Yes, that does look pretty unpleasant. I don't know what's going
> > on with
> > Matthew> Federico, there are other major bugs in there, too.
> > Matthew> I
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 08:39:28PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> Dan Jacobson said:
> > Grass is in a sorry state in Debian.
> > For instance, on the latest upgrade,
> > 557 man pages became just empty files.
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=220293
>
> Yes, that does look pret
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 08:47:13AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>
> * Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030728 22:27]:
> > exim-tls is orphaned since 8 Apr 2003. Furthermore, it is unsupported
> > upstream (supported there is only exim4), is not really needed any
> > more (because crypto can go to
Package: elk
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-01-11
Severity: important
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is elk
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 3.0-8.2
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is i386
fakeroot debian/rules clean
dh_testdir
19 matches
Mail list logo
