Re: autmatically generated watch file

the external repository as well as sending notifications etc. (This and the machine-readable debian/copyright proposed by Sam sounds more and more like dpkg would need a more robust metadata handling mechanism...) Cheers, -- Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: qa - issue: lifecycle management / debian stable & security updates

sts.debian.org/debian-qa/2004/11/msg00000.html -- Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Fwd: Re: [RFC] Software Process Improvement in Free Software, Closing the Quality Cycle, Inventing Non-Developer-Demotivating QA/QM/SPI]

the circle. In order for anything to happen on this front, some individuals must become interested enough to start widening their perception on their own, and then coming back to teach the rest of the Debian community what they have learned. If this doesn't happen, people have just been scratch

Re: [Fwd: Re: [RFC] Software Process Improvement in Free Software, Closing the Quality Cycle, Inventing Non-Developer-Demotivating QA/QM/SPI]

analysis to understand what the highest-level goal is. In the rest of the post, we seemed to agree more or less, so I left it out in order to help us focus on the above things. I'm concerned we may have a very different perception, so it may take a long time before we will learn to understand each other. Cheers, -- Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [RFC] Software Process Improvement in Free Software, Closing the Quality Cycle, Inventing Non-Developer-Demotivating QA/QM/SPI

cent own resources here. There are many places to get some free webspace. It's quite probable that your ISP already provides some. Let me know if you can't find any, I'll help you. -- Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [RFC] Software Process Improvement in Free Software, Closing the Quality Cycle, Inventing Non-Developer-Demotivating QA/QM/SPI

due to > the advanced requirements to OSS, if sufficent output, after then the > implementation. > > > | In this sense, I would probably suggest to begin by trying to inform and > | educate the community in this area, and gradually build a knowledge base > | to enable this discu

Re: [RFC] Software Process Improvement in Free Software, Closing the Quality Cycle, Inventing Non-Developer-Demotivating QA/QM/SPI

a frequent topic for flamewars on the debian-devel list (and elsewhere). In this sense, I would probably suggest to begin by trying to inform and educate the community in this area, and gradually build a knowledge base to enable this discussion. -- Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>