Re: upload_history not updated (Was: UDD mirror not up to date)

2021-08-22 Thread Eriberto Mota
Hi guys, Today I noticed an issue in my report[1] at the end of the first section (called "Sources in Debian Sid including orphan, by upload dates"). Some packages don't have an upload date. This is very common for packages uploaded a few hours ago. However, I can see some packages not updated for

Bug#992461: qa.debian.org: [udd] upload_date and date stalled

2021-08-19 Thread Eriberto Mota
Em qui., 19 de ago. de 2021 às 01:02, Sebastiaan Couwenberg escreveu: > > On 8/18/21 11:40 PM, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote: > > The last registered date in 'upload_date' from 'bapase' is 2021-08-13. In my > > tests I can see the same problem in 'da

Bug#992461: qa.debian.org: [udd] upload_date and date stalled

2021-08-18 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: nil...@debian.org Dear UDD admin, The last registered date in 'upload_date' from 'bapase' is 2021-08-13. In my tests I can see the same problem in 'date' from 'upload_history'. Can you check, please? Thanks in advance. Regards, Eriberto

Bug#966649: Unfortunately there are several Uploads missing (Was: upload_history is back)

2020-08-26 Thread Eriberto Mota
Em qua., 26 de ago. de 2020 às 06:45, Andreas Tille escreveu: > > Control: reopen -1 > > Hi Asheesh, > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:52:56PM -0700, Asheesh Laroia wrote: > > Test yourself with e.g. this command (which queries the public UDD mirror, > > but you can use the real UDD if you can connec

Bug#966649: [UDD] Upload_history table is currently empty

2020-08-12 Thread Eriberto Mota
Hi guys, I would like to say this bug revives #922546. I hope that in the short-term a solution to it will be found. Thanks for all efforts to fix it. Regards, Eriberto

Bug#922546: qa.debian.org: [udd] upload_history table not updating

2019-02-17 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: important Hi all, When using the following command against official and public UDD servers, the dates are missing: SELECT source, upload_date::date FROM bapase ORDER BY upload_date DESC limit 30; The last registered date is 2019-01-16. It can be confirmed here[1

Bug#841831: people.debian.org: provide psql command for UDD users

2016-10-23 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, Please, provide psql command to allow users insert UDD data in their pages. Currently, I have some UDD reports[1] and I need to process my queries in my personal website and, after this, pull from people.debian.org/~eriberto/ [1] https:

Bug#840296: [udd] upload_history table has stopped updating

2016-10-20 Thread Eriberto Mota
Control: severity 840296 important > From: Chris Lamb > (#debian-qa) > > 11:04 < mapreri> lucas: upload_history seems to have stopped a month ago :( > > > > https://paste.debian.net/hidden/8cef723c/ > > I use this table a fair amount in various scripts, so would love to get it

Bug in UDD?

2016-10-19 Thread Eriberto Mota
Hi, I have a little doubt about UDD: why the bapase.upload_date is not updated or why can take a long time to be updated? Is it a bug? As an example, the following query will have the upoad_date empty. The last register is 2016-09-04. SELECT source, upload_date::date FROM bapase ORDER BY upload_

Bug#824470: DDPO: add last-upload and Standards-Version columns

2016-10-05 Thread Eriberto Mota
Hi, I created a report[1] based in UDD that provides the requested information. [1] https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/help_a_package.html Regards, Eriberto

Bug#824470: DDPO: add last-upload and Standards-Version columns

2016-05-16 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, Please, add last-upload and Standards-Version columns. These columns will provide an easiest mode to find and help very old packages, discover visually MIA maintainers, predict future problems, etc. For Standards-Version my suggestion fo

Bug#775292: qa.debian.org: popcon showing several wrong information for Ruby packages in experimental

2015-01-13 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: important Dear Maintainer, These NEW packages were accepted in 'experimental' recently: cewl (Jan 10, 2015) ruby-mime (Dec 29, 2014) ruby-mini-exiftool (Dec 29, 2014) ruby-spider (Dec 29, 2014) The facts: 1. The popcon for cewl, ruby-mini-exiftool and ruby-spid

Bug#761697: DDPO: showing package adopted by third-party as being mine

2014-09-15 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I orphaned the package pacman4console in 2014-07-25. The package was adopted by Alexandre Dantas in 2014-08-12 and I was the sponsor. Currently, the package is shown in both DDPO[1][2]. I reviewed the package again and I can't see errors.

Bug#759027: DDPO: showing old BPO package version

2014-08-29 Thread Eriberto Mota
reopen 759027 thanks Hi! Reopening this bug because I think the problem came back. I uploaded the lime-forensics_1.3~svn.r21-1~bpo70+1 on 2014-08-27 (05:00 UTC). Today, my DDPO is showing the old version yet. Thanks in advance. Regards, Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ

Bug#759030: DDPO: showing a sponsored package as NEW and unstable/testing

2014-08-23 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, My QA page is showing the package 'buildnotify' as NEW and testing at the same time. I uploaded this package to NEW (as sponsor) on 2014-08-03 and it was accepted in unstable on 2014-08-04. Thanks in advance. Regards, Eriberto -- To U

Bug#759027: qa.debian.org: DDPO shows old BPO package version

2014-08-23 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, In my QA page I can't see the versions of my BPO packages. An example is the 'core-network' package. DDPO shows the 4.6-5~bpo70+1 version, when PTS shows 4.7-1~bpo70+1 (uploaded to BPO on 2014-08-17). Thanks in advance. Regards, Eriberto