Bug#694081: DDPO: maintainer's name is taken from revoked GPG uid

2012-11-24 Thread duck
Coin, On 2012-11-23 22:03, Bart Martens wrote: I added a workaround. http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=d...@debian.org The solution is to learn carnivore about historical and actual data. That's not for today. :-) Well, at least it is in the todolist now. Your workaround works well

Bug#694081: DDPO: maintainer's name is taken from revoked GPG uid

2012-11-23 Thread duck
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Coin, Looking at: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=d...@debian.org&comaint=yes or http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=d...@duckcorp.org&comaint=yes I see: Packages overview for The Duck Maintainer: The Duck Maintainer:

Bug#472432: DDPO: the Uninstallable information lacks explanation and seems to be wrong/desynched

2008-03-29 Thread Duck
some sort of recursive report like "why is X not in testing ?" would help find the root of the problem. Thanks for your help, dear keysigner ;-). -- Marc Dequènes (Duck) pgpJJ279tNQ2y.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#472432: DDPO: the Uninstallable information lacks explanation and seems to be wrong/desynched

2008-03-24 Thread Duck
installability. I was pointed to http://edos.debian.net by KiBi, which is perhaps the source of the DDPO check, and looking at the whole 7 last runs, i was unable to find activeldap. So, i wonder which one is wrong. Regards. -- Marc Dequènes (Duck) pgpW0u3k7skuB.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#281299: maintainer considered as comaint

2006-01-20 Thread Duck
more the gnome-panel and gnome-applets maintainer. Nevertheless, kwalify has now entered the Ruby Team, with an Uploaders field generated in a similar way as the one for the GNOME Team (the script is derived from the GNOME Team's one), and it behaves correctly. So i guess this bug is fixed.

Bug#348810: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#348810: QA Developer summary page broken for duck account)

2006-01-19 Thread Duck
I just discovered the link for packages in incoming. This page really becomes more and more useful (thus absolutly essential). Thanks for your nice work. -- Marc Dequènes (Duck) pgpYtnskFt8NZ.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#348810: QA Developer summary page broken for duck account

2006-01-19 Thread Duck
Coin, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is this a new problem? Maybe it is related to the packages.debian.org > problems. This is a recent problem, but qa.d.o is working for most people, so this is probably unrelated. -- Marc Dequènes (Duck) pgp74qM8p8pmB.pgp Desc

Bug#348810: QA Developer summary page broken for duck account

2006-01-18 Thread Duck
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: important Look at this: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?package=slune&comaint=yes BTW, i'm to feed a bug against b.d.o for a similar problem. This is very annoying to be unable to use our important tools, thus the severity. -- Marc Dequè

Bug#281299: maintainer considered as comaint

2004-11-14 Thread Duck
port, sorry. Notice i am not listed in the GNOME Team Uploaders as i am not (yet) an official DD (which could have mislead your script). Thanks -- Marc Dequènes (Duck) pgpFtX2edCyTq.pgp Description: PGP signature