osed or do you think it will end up
> wontfix anyway? (I never filed a bug against debbugs ...)
Please file it. At the very least, it will put in on my radar so I
remember to include it in the BTS's SQL schema
--
Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com
life's not a paragraph
And death i think is no parenthesis
-- e.e. cummings "Four VII" _is 5_
if BTS code
> was also available. Right now it lists only copyright info -
> https://www.debian.org/Bugs/
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Debbugs lists the git repos which have all
of the code.
--
Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com
Identical parts aren't.
-- Beach's Law
Control: reassign -1 debbugs
Control: affects -1 tracker.debian.org
Control: retitle -1 Bugs in binary packages which have migrated from one source
package to another show up in the wrong source package
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Dec 2014, Don Armstrong wr
doesn't make
> much sense to me... why does it list so many source packages and not
> only one like on
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704070 ?
It lists multiple sources because this bug was filed against the ffmpeg
binary package, which is built from those sources,
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
> To avoid devolving in a naming the bike-shed discussion, anyone who has
> a strong opinion, please manually vote in
>
> https://debian.titanpad.com/24
>
> and I'll tabulate them 24 hours from now.
The winner is "newcome
new letter. [Hopefully this will work; I reserve the
right to veto if silliness occurs.]
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
If it jams, force it. If it breaks, it needed replacing anyway.
-- Lowery's Law
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.de
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014, Stéphane Aulery wrote:
> Le mardi 11 novembre 2014 à 03:54:50, Don Armstrong a écrit :
> > On Wed, 12 Nov 2014, Stéphane Aulery wrote:
> > > Le mardi 11 novembre 2014 à 03:07:31, Don Armstrong a écrit :
> > > >
> > > > The existing
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014, Stéphane Aulery wrote:
> Le mardi 11 novembre 2014 à 03:07:31, Don Armstrong a écrit :
> >
> > The existing help tag is really for bugs for which the maintainer needs
> > or wants help; these are basically a superset of entry-point, and bugs
> > wh
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Stéphane Aulery wrote:
> Le mardi 11 novembre 2014 à 02:45:26, Don Armstrong a écrit :
> > On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > I am totally in favor of turning it into a real tag.
> > >
> > > There has been discussions about r
ift;tag=faketag;user=debian-qa@lists.debian.org
We can also just make sure that bugs which have the gift tag get the
"entry-point" tag too. [And we should probably do the opposite as well.]
This would be a bit hacky, but it's totally possible to do in a pretty
quick cronjob un
> infrastructure in a separate category. Stefano Zacchiroli did that for
> some debsources bugs, and this apparently had noticeable effects in
> terms of contributions.
[...]
> [0] https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/GiftTag
Does anyone have any thoughts about elevating the gift tag to
the BTS, but doing so
requires me to complete the postgresql migration work.
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
All bad precedents began as justifiable measures.
-- Gaius Julius Caesar in "The Conspiracy of Catiline" by Sallust
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Yeah, it's not working. I've got it on my TODO list, but haven't had a
> chance to work on it yet. I will probably have a chance next weekend
> to spend some time on it.
So I think I've fixed this now; had to finally s
Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Freitag, 7. Februar 2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > I've now rolled this out, but bugscan's crontab hasn't run yet. I'll
> > keep an eye on it to make sure it works.
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/ do
On Wed, 05 Feb 2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Yeah. I think this is a bug I introduced when I switched to using
> bugcfg instead of the hardcoded values which were being used before. I
> just fixed this in @81492, but I haven't rolled it out to the BTS yet.
I've now rolled this
> The BTS lists e.g. #710310, which is wheezy-ignore. So it seems that the
> BTS ignores wheezy-ignore.
Yeah. I think this is a bug I introduced when I switched to using bugcfg
instead of the hardcoded values which were being used before. I just
fixed this in @81492, but I h
g of index.db.realtime. I'll take a closer look at it
shortly. [I glanced at it earlier just to show to myself that you were
seeing a real problem, but I haven't had a chance to really fix it.]
Don Armstrong
--
"People selling drug paraphernalia ... are as much a part of drug
tra
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > [ Adding debian-debbugs@ to Cc. Full thread at
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2012/09/msg00027.html ]
>
> Yes, I'm aware of this problem, and have been in the process of f
insrc and srcbin
index, and the code that rebuilds that isn't particularly fast.]
It has just finished the first run, and I'm in the process of adding
the entries which have been added since the run started.
Don Armstrong
--
If it jams, force it. If it breaks, it needed replacing anyw
ecommend we fix this?
One way would just be to cp /org/bugs/debian.org/etc/config foo;
DEBBUGS_CONFIG_FILE="foo"; blah blah blah;
another would be to convince me that what I did out of an abundance of
caution wasn't particularly useful (which could be true.)
Don Armstrong
--
Wh
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Don Armstrong wrote:
>
> > [For those following along at home, to fix, we'd do this:
> > bts found 48057 openssh/1:4.2p1-5 , notfound 48057 openssh-client/1:4.2p1-5
> > ; ]
>
> Why wou
probably guess this
better in the BTS than I do currently, but that's why it's throwing
those error messages.
[For those following along at home, to fix, we'd do this:
bts found 48057 openssh/1:4.2p1-5 , notfound 48057 openssh-client/1:4.2p1-5 ; ]
Don Armstrong
--
If I had a letter, s
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Sep 2010, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > (rsync://bugs-mirror.debian.org/bts-versions/indices/binsrc.idx). [You
> > should also be able to directly rsync the sources file using
> > rsync://bugs-mirror.debian.org/bts-spool-inde
e BTS needs.]
I'm not sure exactly what qa.debian.org needs, but I'm assuming it's
similar to what the BTS requires.
Don Armstrong
--
Build a fire for a man, an he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on
fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
-- Jules Bean
http
file, which you can
rsync directly from the BTS
(rsync://bugs-mirror.debian.org/bts-versions/indices/binsrc.idx). [You
should also be able to directly rsync the sources file using
rsync://bugs-mirror.debian.org/bts-spool-indexes/sources .]
Don Armstrong
--
We have to face the fact that eith
entually?
[I'm also interested in trying to make sure that whatever
inter-bug-tracker formats we settle on exporting are more widely
supported, as my time to understand and implement format translators
is relatively limited.]
Don Armstrong
--
Three little words. (In descending order of im
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Julius Davies wrote:
> I'm curious to see the "Debbugs::Bugs" code. Where can I find this package?
>
> I tried "apt-get source debbugs" but I couldn't find it in there!
http://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/mainline/Debbugs/Bugs.pm
d in maintaining it, I'd be happy to see
it deployed on the master BTS server. I suppose it can live on merkel
for the time being until you're ready to migrate it, but having it
under the debbugs umbrella would be good. [Not that I'd be actually
touching it much, because my python-fu[1
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> The BTS mirror on merkel is missing /org/bugs.debian.org/pseudopackages/
> , and that causes the BTS import to fail.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], could you please fix that?
This has been resolved now.
Don Armstrong
--
Certainly the ga
g?
Not automatically, but it's not like doing this manually in a single
shot is hard.
Don Armstrong
--
Only one creature could have duplicated the expressions on their
faces, and that would be a pigeon who has heard not only that Lord
Nelson has got down off his column but has also been
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Luk Claes wrote:
> Don Armstrong wrote:
>> *** proposal ***
>>
>> For the purposes of determining buginess, setting a distribution tag
>> limits the bugginess of a package in distribtions to the intersection
>> of the distributions and
iness state above
instead, defaulting to (testing distribution), sid.
*** end proposal ***
Does that meet the needs of the RMs et al? Are there any objections?
Don Armstrong
1: It's quite likely that we talked about the way it should work, and
I totally forgot about what we decided that it sho
hey wanted to delete the
user to easily cause the user to be deleted, and do so in an automated
fashion.
Don Armstrong
1: Granted, this best practice should probaly be codified in the
Developer's Reference, not policy, but we could discuss it at the same
time.
--
It was said that life was ch
hink because of this bugs bug.
There are no bugs listed because the bug in question was downgraded
from grave to important:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=348240;msg=33
Don Armstrong
--
"The question of whether computers can think is like the question of
whether subma
34 matches
Mail list logo
