Bug#788172: Packages with RC-bug tagged stretch and sid are not considered for autoremoval

2015-06-08 Thread David Prévot
Package: release.debian.org,qa.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertag: tools User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: udd Hi, It looks like packages affected by bugs tagged sid and stretch are not considered for autoremoval. E.g, - php-auth-http

Re: Differences between fields in debian/control and upstream-metadata

2014-09-09 Thread David Prévot
Hi, Le 09/09/2014 09:24, Andreas Tille a écrit : > a source of confusion which nobody really was aware about. Yet, I thought it had already been pointed before, and indeed: <20130103072801.gc28...@x230-buxy.home.ouaza.com> > Le 03/01/2013 03:28, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : >> On Thu, 03 Jan 2013

Re: Differences between fields in debian/control and upstream-metadata

2014-09-02 Thread David Prévot
Hi, Le 02/09/2014 17:04, Simon Kainz a écrit : > mira > upstream-metadata: http://www.chevreux.org/projects_mira.html > control-file: http://chevreux.org/projects_mira.html > diff size: 34 lines Please note that those differences are just of the self-link kind, as translated by lynx: nei

Bug#758976: vcswatch: confused by multiple packages in multiple Git branches

2014-08-23 Thread David Prévot
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, As one can see, e.g., for php-guzzle [1] or php-zend-stdlib [2], there seems to be a bad assumption that all branches are about the same package. Anyway, the “Error: changelog package does not match source ” error message is incorrect for these package

Bug#758289: package in NEW not listed as pending upload

2014-08-22 Thread David Prévot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, > On 22 August 2014 12:29, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> The package libmoox-cmd-perl is in the NEW queue: >> https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/libmoox-cmd-perl_0.009-1.html >> >> ...but still - after several days - lists as "Owned WNPP bugs", no

Bug#748223: UDD: DMD - "uscan returned an error" while fixed in PTS - githubredir?

2014-05-15 Thread David Prévot
Hi, On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 02:11:19PM +0200, Leo Iannacone wrote: > there is some problem with watch checks. > While, according with PTS page, watch check is fine: > * http://packages.qa.debian.org/pdf.js No idea if that’s relevant, but I moved away from githubredir.debian.net and used direc

Re: No wnpp report email to debian-devel today

2013-06-21 Thread David Prévot
Hi, Le 21/06/2013 05:02, Cédric Boutillier a écrit : > I was expecting to receive the weekly wnpp report in the debian-devel mailing > list, but there is no such message in the mail archive. Isn’t what you are looking for? Regards, David signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signatur

Re: Bug#685039: developers-reference: please document what is needed to reintroduce a package

2012-09-16 Thread David Prévot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, Le 16/09/2012 21:16, Paul Wise a écrit : > > -Moving, removing, renaming, adopting, and orphaning packages > +Moving, removing, reintroducing, renaming, adopting, and orphaning > packages > I guess “reintroducing” should be the last item o

Re: backbone: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libnode-uglify

2012-08-25 Thread David Prévot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Lucas, QA contributors, Le 14/08/2012 03:18, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > Source: backbone […] > Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64 > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to > build on amd64. […] >> The

Re: bug in udd script for carnivore and a couple of questions

2012-07-22 Thread David Prévot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Martín, On 21/07/2012 21:22, Martín Ferrari wrote: > I would like to find out translators, contains raw data about translators, it's used to produce some status information on the website (e.g.

Bug#678024: [qa.debian.org] OpenSearch plugin not working

2012-06-18 Thread David Prévot
Hi, Le 18/06/2012 13:52, Filipus Klutiero a écrit : > Raphaël Geissert recently added an OpenSearch plugin to the PTS Yep, thanks Raphael for also including this in www.d.o. > I can see the code is deployed, and it looks OK. Actually, there is a just “title="Debian PTS search"” missing in the

Re: Bug#668814: www.debian.org: PTS page: link to patch tracker returns: can't find any package named...

2012-04-14 Thread David Prévot
reassign 668814 qa.debian.org thanks Hi, Le 14/04/2012 11:17, Jari Aalto a écrit : > Package: www.debian.org > Severity: normal > >>From lower right of page in section PATCH-TACKER: Please, have a look lower, in the footer: “Report problems to the qa.debian.org pseudopackage in the Debian BTS.”

Re: Bug#668051: RM: aafigure -- RoQA; orphaned, unused

2012-04-13 Thread David Prévot
Le 13/04/2012 14:16, Clint Adams a écrit : > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 08:08:13PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: >> Thanks. This will teach me to never orphan packages, but pretend >> that I'm maintaining them instead. > > I hate learning that lesson. Maybe requesting for adoption could fit better than o

Re: clang.d.n on the PTS?

2012-03-01 Thread David Prévot
Hi Sylvestre, Le 01/03/2012 07:32, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit : > Le jeudi 01 mars 2012 à 08:02 +0800, Paul Wise a écrit : >> Also, could you add a note to DeveloperNews about this? >> >> http://wiki.debian.org/DeveloperNews > Sure. I just did! Actually, you added information for the Debian Projec

links to services from the pseudo-packages page

2011-12-17 Thread David Prévot
Le 15/12/2011 16:15, David Prévot a écrit : > Context: linking the wnpp page [1] the bugs [2] page. > [1] http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ > [2] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/ > I'm anyway CCing debian-qa also in charge of www.d.o/wnpp in > case someone may have another o

Re: Re: Bug#277815: wnpp on bugs page

2011-12-15 Thread David Prévot
Context: linking the wnpp page [1] the bugs [2] page. [1] http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ [2] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/ Hi, On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 15:59:33 -0600, David Moreno Garza wrote: > On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 12:33 -0600, David Moreno Garza wrote: >> Well, I'm just thinking the link could be

Re: Bug#646345: www.debian.org: svn.d.o / anonscm.d.o give python traceback error when file is not found

2011-10-23 Thread David Prévot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 reassign 646345 qa.debian.org thanks Hi, Le 23/10/2011 06:31, Touko Korpela a écrit : > packages.qa.debian.org/m/mdadm.html has link "Call for testers of new mdadm > versions" that outputs > exception error message (python traceback) instead of p

Bug#627578: Please, restore the work-needing packages report

2011-05-21 Thread David Prévot
Le 22/04/2011 15:12, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : >> On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, David Prévot wrote: >>> Would it be a good idea to convert this script to use the Debbugs' SOAP >>> interface instead of bts2ldap? Could someone please point where the code >>> would be publ

Re: Work-needing packages report for Oct 22, 2010

2011-04-22 Thread David Prévot
[ patch actually attached ] Le 22/04/2011 17:01, David Prévot a écrit : > Hi, > > Le 22/04/2011 15:12, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : >> On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, David Prévot wrote: >>> Would it be a good idea to convert this script to use the Debbugs' SOAP >>> interf

Re: Work-needing packages report for Oct 22, 2010

2011-04-22 Thread David Prévot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Le 22/04/2011 17:01, David Prévot a écrit : > Hi, > > Le 22/04/2011 15:12, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : >> On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, David Prévot wrote: >>> Would it be a good idea to convert this script to use the Debbugs'

Re: Work-needing packages report for Oct 22, 2010

2011-04-22 Thread David Prévot
Hi, Le 22/04/2011 15:12, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, David Prévot wrote: >> Would it be a good idea to convert this script to use the Debbugs' SOAP >> interface instead of bts2ldap? Could someone please point where the code >> would be publicly a

Re: Work-needing packages report for Oct 22, 2010

2011-04-21 Thread David Prévot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, Le 22/10/2010 10:26, Martin Zobel-Helas a écrit : > On Fri Oct 22, 2010 at 00:25:44 +, w...@debian.org wrote: >> The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested >> through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packa

Bug#601636: [UDD] Please add new filters (Was: Bug#601488: Broken links in http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/)

2010-10-27 Thread David Prévot
[Should have CC this request to debian-qa] Hi, Le 26/10/2010 13:25, David Prévot a écrit : > Le 26/10/2010 12:51, Luca Ferroni a écrit : >> There are broken links in http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/ >> (italian language) > >> "Bug nel sistema base" -&

Bug#601623: qa.debian.org: [UDD] bapase displays comments in an extra column

2010-10-27 Thread David Prévot
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: minor Tags: patch Hi, One empty colomn is displayed before the “Comments” one. The tiny (untested) following patch should resolve this issue. Regards David -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (600, 'unstable')

Re: Bug#601488: Broken links in http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/

2010-10-26 Thread David Prévot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Le 26/10/2010 12:51, Luca Ferroni a écrit : > There are broken links in http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/ > (italian language) > > "Bug nel sistema base" -> http://bugs.qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/base.cgi > "Bug nei pacchetti standard e task" ->