; If I submit an action over a bug (e.g.: bts reassign # wnpp or bts retitle #
> "NewTitle"), how long it takes to be reflected in the available LDAP record?
Using the SOAP interface, that's immediately, AFAICT.
--
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/
"Oye, ¿y vas a venir con tu vieja?". "No, voy a ver qué pedo".
On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 15:14 +0200, Bluefuture wrote:
> Could we do any action for let maintainers to adopt this watch file?
I'd suggest bug filling and NMUing if necessary. I volunteer for helping
on it.
--
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/
Respeto a
nside or outside the package. It's better to be inside
the package anyway.
--
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/
Poor Mexico: So far from God, so close to the United States.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just
> need to test and see how that is done.
What about an RFH?
--
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GPG: C671257D
Va amazando a sus cuates con un fierro.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive ITPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
ITPs when they reach one year old).
A similar process will be applied to the RFP wnpp bugs in the next
days.
Thank
wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive ITPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
ITPs when they reach one year old).
A similar process will be applied to the RFP wnpp bugs in the next
days.
Thank
wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive ITPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
ITPs when they reach one year old).
A similar process will be applied to the RFP wnpp bugs in the next
days.
Thank
wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive ITPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
ITPs when they reach one year old).
A similar process will be applied to the RFP wnpp bugs in the next
days.
Thank
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: important
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
wnpp option on developer.php shows no entries anymore. Example:
http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Returns nothing. Probably an LDAP access problem?
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unst
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 10:33 +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> ... Known bug?
Yes.
--
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/
When I die I'm going to leave my body to science fiction.
GPG: C671257D - 6EF6 C284 C95D 78F6 0B78 FFD3 981C 5FD7 C671 257D
--
s, according on what he told
me, but he is planning to get back soon.
FWIW.
--
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/
"Wanted: Expert Java programmers, 5+ years experience." - Posted in
1998.
GPG: C671257D - 6EF6 C284 C95D 78F6 0B78 FFD3 981C 5FD7 C6
bugs.debian.org/release-critical/
--
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/
GPG: 356E16CD - 84F0 E180 8AF6 E8D0 842F B520 63F3 08DB 356E 16CD
God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh.
12 matches
Mail list logo