Today I found several packages for which the version and release information is
completely wrong. rmadison and the tracker report different releases for the
same versions. Examples:
ruby-capistrano-colors
ruby-cal-heatmap-rails
ruby-algorithm-diff
ruby-albino
I'll probably find more. But this loo
Am Samstag, den 28.03.2020, 15:43 +0100 schrieb Adam Borowski:
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 03:10:56PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> > Package: tracker.debian.org
> > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/berkshelf
> >
> > still shows a version for berkshelf in unstable altoug
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/berkshelf
still shows a version for berkshelf in unstable altough this package has been
removed more then a month ago. Also the package database has no berkshelf
record any
I'm finally out :) If nobody steps up, the mentioned packages will be
officially orphaned after September 2015.
Regards, Daniel
Am Freitag, den 24.07.2015, 17:40 -0400 schrieb Kristoffer Rose:
> Yes, that would be great! --Kris
> On Jul 24, 2015 5:35 PM, "Daniel Leidert" &l
Hi Kris,
Am Samstag, den 30.05.2015, 22:08 -0400 schrieb Kristoffer Rose:
> I have XML expertise, I am a DD, and I maintain nothing for now (only
> have a few ITPs out).
>
> Any chance you would be at DebCamp and could do a two day intense
> "catchup" on the involved work?
I'll be at DebConf.
Hi,
Is it possible, that the watch file service of our PTS has some issue
atm? The PTS spuriously reports "temporary or permanent problems" for
some projects, although the watch files look perfectly ok to me and
uscan does work as expected. Some examples:
https://packages.qa.debian.org/a/abgate.h
Am Samstag, den 30.05.2015, 22:08 -0400 schrieb Kristoffer Rose:
> Dear Daniel and Osamu,
>
>
> I have XML expertise, I am a DD, and I maintain nothing for now (only
> have a few ITPs out).
>
>
> Any chance you would be at DebCamp and could do a two day intense
> "catchup" on the involved work?
Am Samstag, den 30.05.2015, 19:00 +0200 schrieb W. Martin Borgert:
> On 2015-05-28 23:24, Daniel Leidert wrote:
[not using DB toolchain]
> Just out of curiosity: What are you using now?
I haven't done much documentation lately. But I use GROFF for writing
manual pages for Debian pac
x-post
Hi everybody,
I was part of the Debian XML/SGML team [1] for quite some time and it
was fun maintaining the whole DocBook toolchain. Unfortunately I'm not
using it anymore and thus have lost interest in these packages. Now
after Jessie has been released, I'm finally stepping back as mainta
Hi,
I noticed, that the debcheck QA pages were updated last in September 2013.
Is this normal/intentional or is there some issue? The qa.d.o bug-tracker
doesn't list a bug report about this.
Regards, Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsub
Am Sonntag, den 31.05.2009, 16:37 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 03:28:27PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> > Committed yesterday. I cannot upload the package, but you can, if you
> > need it. IIRC the build hung on an i386 system when I tested 1.2.9. That
Am Freitag, den 29.05.2009, 23:32 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> I realised that cimg-dev package was not updated since
> nearly two days. Two bugs requesting an update to
> more recent upstream version (#399846, #497672) one
> of them is even blocking an other package were ignored.
The 4 bugs o
Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Daniel Leidert wrote:
[sf.net redirector broken]
> Being curious, why did you access the redirector directly and not via
> uscan?
I found the problem, because PET currently fails on watch files
with sf.net URLs. See for example here ("Download
Hi,
When I type the requested URL, say for example
http://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php/docbook-xsl
Then an Internal Server Error is reported and the page
itself shows:
"No mirror could satisfy the request. Please report this
message to debian-qa@lists.debian.org"
Using uscan on the command line
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The packages.qa.debian.org/$(pkg) sites contain broken links to the
changelog and copyright files. The links miss the category.
Regards, Daniel
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers
Am Donnerstag, den 09.10.2008, 16:31 +0200 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (09/10/2008):
> > [1] http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&comaint=yes
>
> See <http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=Leidert>,
These seem to be the 25
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I don't know if you changed something but when I looked at the list of
my packages (packages I (co-)maintain) today I found just an incomplete
list. I have 37 source packages, but [1] just lists 12 or so.
I fir
Am Dienstag, den 28.08.2007, 11:00 +0200 schrieb Bluefuture:
[wrong Debian version]
> > http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/maintainer.php?name=gabedit
[..]
> > and the copyright link is still broken (tested with lynx and iceweasel).
> > Do I have to wait some minutes or do I have to check at a differen
This bug doesn't seem to be fixed. When I look at the page:
http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/maintainer.php?name=gabedit
it still says:
Debian Version: 2.0.11
instead of:
Debian Version: 2.0.11-1
and the copyright link is still broken (tested with lynx and iceweasel).
Do I have to wait some minu
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
See http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] and
look at the gabedit package. You will, that the table shoes, that
upstream is at version number 2011, which seems to be higher than
2.0.11, but it's of course not t
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Look at http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/maintainer.php?name=gabedit and
you can see, that the Debian version seems to be 2.0.11. But gabedit is
at 2.0.11-1. So the created link to the copyright is broken too.
Reg
21 matches
Mail list logo
