Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
I wish there was a way to use the
https://wiki.debian.org/UltimateDebianDatabase/
to find all the bugs I have submitted, for all packages in Debian,
latest first, limit=30.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
Anyway the BTS is more "ultimate" until a submitter search field is added to
UDD.
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
I was at DebConf18 and told a developer I had recently submitted a bug
regarding his stuff but forgot the exact package name.
He was unable to find it in the UDD as there is no way to search on bug
submitter, so he was forced to search the BTS.
He should
severity 217957 critical
severity 6786 critical
merge 6786 217957
# critical: breaks Debian package system worldwide several hours a day.
# How to fix: Packages files should get to mirrors last.
On the Debian mirrors, each day there is a period, perhaps a few
hours, between the time the Packages files arrive, and the time
packages themselves arrive.
This is not a problem, because it happens early in the morning when
all Debian users are of course asleep... except for me.
It would seem to
Matthew> Yes, that does look pretty unpleasant. I don't know what's going on
with
Matthew> Federico, there are other major bugs in there, too.
Matthew> If he hasn't surfaced in the next few days, I'll whip up an NMU to fix
up
Matthew> the problems, probably upgrading to the latest upstream while
Grass is in a sorry state in Debian.
For instance, on the latest upgrade,
557 man pages became just empty files.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=220293
>>>>> "Lukas" == Lukas Geyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lukas> Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Lets say the user has just jumped to, oh,
>> http://packages.qa.debian.org/w/wwwoffle.html
>>
>> Todo
>>
>&g
Package: qa.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-10
Severity: wishlist
Lets say the user has just jumped to, oh,
http://packages.qa.debian.org/w/wwwoffle.html
Todo
You should update the package to follow the last version of
[26]Debian Policy (Standards-Version 3.5.9 inst
Dear QA group, was I wrong in encouraging efficiency?
>>>>> "Avery" == Avery Pennarun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Avery> On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 02:51:03AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
>> Package: netselect
>> Version: 0.3-4
>> Severity: minor
Package: qa.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-01-26
Severity: minor
sorry but here's some examples of somethings maybe packages should
check: things that won't be discovered until cron.monthly does.
e.g. the HylaFAX folks never thought i wouldn't even have faxed once
this month.
the
Package: qa.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-16
Severity: wishlist
if a command doesn't have a man page, the best one can do is do a
risky $command --help to guess what it does. E.g. with lspgpot ...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kern
Package: qa.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-16
Severity: wishlist
Gentlemen, when we (re)boot, like I do every day [I power off when not
in use] we start to notice that there's some console messages that
flit by fast, and aren't found by e.g.
# uptime
06:08:57 up 32 min, 3 user
I don't know if this bad or just a matter of taste. I sent it 6 weeks ago:
Bug#159386: (ledcontrol: a new sleep executed every 5 sec, you are the
process number user champion)
Package: ledcontrol
Version: 0.5.2-4
Severity: minor
Not that this is good or bad, but I noticed your program, doing a n
By the way, another thing I hate about debian is: I want to install a
program, slowly read its documents and man pages, then activate the
features I want. But no, e.g. ledcontrol and indeed other led
programs start playing with your leds right after you install them.
So, I suppose the safe way to
Thanks for making reporting bugs easier for use mere "one night stand"
users. Just like the police: if you make reporting convenient, you
get more crime tips.
--
http://jidanni.org/ Taiwan(04)25854780
Am I correct that the libdb3-util package is not up to par, as it has
no man pages, seemly no --help, no doc/README...
Indeed the most I can learn about it is its 2 lines of description in
aptitude. Anyway, you qa guys take it from here.
--
http://jidanni.org/ Taiwan(04)25854780
licked on 'rotate right' and
'display' crashed on my .tif file
Please let see the webpage:
http://www.imagemagick.org
You can see the way haw to submit a bug report to the upstraem author.
From: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#161349: imagema
18 matches
Mail list logo
