On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 12:59:15AM +0200, Stefan Schörghofer wrote:
> Please remove the package ytalk due to following reasons:
> - Package is orphaned since > 1500 days
> - lates upstream release is from 2005
> - Popcon is < 250
How are these good reasons?
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 01:29:14PM +0100, Matthieu Caneill wrote:
> Have you considered using a web interface instead of a desktop
> application? There might be pros and cons but worth looking into it
> IMO.
I'd like to see a Kanban webapp that's not in PHP.
Package: qa.debian.org
Since only Packages.xz exists now, debootstrap < 1.0.84 fails,
thus breaking chroot creation.
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 08:08:13PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Thanks. This will teach me to never orphan packages, but pretend
> that I'm maintaining them instead.
I hate learning that lesson.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 03:37:46AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> That is indeed a true statement, but I'm unsure what point you're trying
> to make in the context of this discussion.
>
> Care to elaborate?
Sure. The point I am trying to make is that encouraging someone to
adopt a package whe
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 01:21:19AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> So you think the Debian QA group, consisting of at most a dozen people
> who do QA uploads, maintaining over 500 packages, will take better care
> of it?
The commitment for maintaining a package should be greater than "will do
a
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 01:17:24PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>db (U)
>zsh
My first suggestion is to list binary packages instead of source.
Then I could say that db4.6-doc is already arch:all
and that zsh-static is a false pos
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 06:50:33PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> It is definetly not blacklisted anymore I talked about that
> with a berlios admin.
> How often is dehs updating its data? Is this maybe connected
> to #431265?
Last I heard, it was getting stuck on
http://www.gentoo.com/di/di-4.11.ta
> Perhaps Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is interested in taking moria,
> because he asks for relicensing first? Sorry, Clint, if not.
No, I am not interested in maintaining moria or any of the angbands.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
I suggest orphaning "fcheck"; Graham Simpson has not responded to the
BTS since 18 Oct 2002, and was rejected by his AM for not being
responsive since 13 May 2003.
> Mind posting useful information and not a collection of letters and
> numbers stolen from lynx output of a table it can't render? Currently,
> there is less than little value in the mail.
[ a small amount of information was discarded in the reformatting]
(popular packages with newer upstream v
> > #87667 gstreamerfiled: 546, changed 546
>
> As an example, this package was uploaded to experimental on friday,
> and has been packaged upstream for about a year. It was last changed
> 62 days ago.
Why experimental?
> Steve Kowalik had fixed the release-critical issues with yodl itself
> before the package was removed. I'm happy to resurrect yodl, fix the
> rest of its bugs, and maintain it until such time as nothing else in
> Debian build-depends on it. (I'm the groff maintainer, so another
> documentation la
Looks like the NM gauntlet has finally been run. Congratulations.
Can we expect a fixed set6x86 deb anytime soon?
> I've solved it, but I'm very reluctant to upload a package like set6x86
> which I have no way of testing, especially when I'm poking at assembler.
> Does anyone have a Cyrix 6x86 on which they could test my package?
Richard Hecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> may be able to help you out.
Package: mozilla
Version: 19981008-0.1
M5 is out.
-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Kernel Version: Linux betrayer 2.2.5 #2 Sat Apr 10 21:10:48 EDT 1999 i586
unknown
Versions of the packages mozilla depends on:
ii lesstifg0.88.1-2 OSF/Motif implementation released unde
16 matches
Mail list logo
