Re: poco library is "basically orphaned", newer version available, Mumble has poco dependency

2024-01-13 Thread Chris Knadle
Thanks for responding, Andreas. Additioanl notes below. On 1/7/24 03:10, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi Chris, Am Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 09:32:59PM -0500 schrieb Chris Knadle: Here's what I would wish to do "in a perfect world": 1. I'd like to do an NMU upload to orphan the packa

poco library is "basically orphaned", newer version available, Mumble has poco dependency

2024-01-04 Thread Chris Knadle
ers. Updating the library would allow the packages depending on it to migrate, and would remove one of the 16 reverse-dependencies of libpcre3-dev. Thanks -- Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us Debian Developer

Re: Package modifying a user-modified config file? [Bug #780797]

2015-03-22 Thread Chris Knadle
On 03/22/2015 08:45 AM, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi Chris, Hi Holger. :) > On Samstag, 21. März 2015, Chris Knadle wrote: >> understandable, and an extent to which it's a bit frightening because >> it means I can't know what I'll be notified concerning chan

Re: Package modifying a user-modified config file? [Bug #780797]

2015-03-21 Thread Chris Knadle
On 03/21/2015 04:53 PM, James McCoy wrote: > On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 04:36:20PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote: >> On 03/21/2015 04:10 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: >>> The only trouble is /etc/ssh/sshd_config, which is not a conffile for >>> whatever reason. >> >> Ugh.

Re: Package modifying a user-modified config file? [Bug #780797]

2015-03-21 Thread Chris Knadle
On 03/21/2015 04:10 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Chris Knadle , 2015-03-21, 15:22: >> At present the openssh-server and openssh-client packages are altering >> /etc/ssh/ssh_config and /etc/ssh/sshd_config without prompting the >> user beforehand, even when they've been

Re: Package modifying a user-modified config file? [Bug #780797]

2015-03-21 Thread Chris Knadle
On 03/21/2015 04:14 PM, Russ Allbery wrote: > Chris Knadle writes: > >> At present the openssh-server and openssh-client packages are >> altering /etc/ssh/ssh_config and /etc/ssh/sshd_config without >> prompting the user beforehand, even when they've been local

Package modifying a user-modified config file? [Bug #780797]

2015-03-21 Thread Chris Knadle
gi?bug=780797 and the changes made were requested in a wishlist bug: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=765633 -- Chris -- Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou

Re: reportbug reports are not sent

2014-09-18 Thread Chris Knadle
On Thursday, September 18, 2014 18:00:26 Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Chris Knadle wrote: > > - Using "regular" IMAP (i.e. not "disconnected" IMAP) is common, and > > in that setup there are only mail indexes locally, and not act

Re: reportbug reports are not sent

2014-09-18 Thread Chris Knadle
ending bug reports formatted by reportbug-ng using a normal mail client. It detects locally installed MUAs (but it doesn't detect any of the webmail I occasionally use AFAICT). It's definitely worth trying IMHO. -- Chris -- Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us -- To UNSUBSCRIB

Re: reportbug reports are not sent

2014-09-17 Thread Chris Knadle
eating a bug report. The mail then only gets queued, not sent, so it shows up via 'mailq' and can be removed via 'exim4 -Mrm ' so that it won't get sent when setting the QUEUERUNNER back to 'combined'. -- Chris -- Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us

Re: reportbug reports are not sent

2014-09-17 Thread Chris Knadle
tions of email getting stuck are sent to who is set to get the email for the root user, but it's then common that nobody looks at that email. [This issue gets discussed periodically, and I haven't yet heard a viable solution for it other than "have someone look at the mail that

Re: Bug#739997: mumble: adopt package without maintainer response?

2014-03-18 Thread Chris Knadle
On Tuesday, March 18, 2014 14:59:56 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > (Ccing the current maintainers of mumble) > > Hi, > > On 17/03/14 at 18:21 -0400, Chris Knadle wrote: > > Greetings. > > > > I'm looking to adopt the mumble package after a long period of inac

mumble: adopt package without maintainer response?

2014-03-17 Thread Chris Knadle
ng input from [debian-qa] for this purpose. So is it okay for me to adopt the package? Thanks in advance for any input. -- Chris [1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/06/msg00048.html [2]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/10/msg00469.html -- Chris -- Chris Knadle