reassign 33210 metamail
--
Sorry, but unless pine is calling the "run-mailcap" program, there is no
bug in the "mime-support" package. Instead, the problem is with the
package the specified said mailcap line under /usr/lib/mime/packages,
presumably "metamail" judging by the discussion.
All the
Package: tunnelv
Version: 1.00-4
If the site tunnelv is trying to connect to is unreachable, it does not
continue to retry. When used with something like a dial-up modem, this
means it will try to start once, fail because the connection is
established, and never try again.
I'm using the init scr
/init.d/tunnelv:
---
#! /bin/sh
###
#
# Tunnel Vision: start script
#
# Written by Brian White &l
> > Since /etc/mailcap was not included, there is no way I can determine
> > what the problem may be. I'd guess that metamail is the source of
> > the problem, or possibly the mailcap line created by the zgv file.
> >
>
> Please find attached my mailcap file.
>
> I have also tested the following
reassign 58174 metamail
--
> Package: mime-support
> Version: 3.9-1
> Severity: important
Since /etc/mailcap was not included, there is no way I can determine
what the problem may be. I'd guess that metamail is the source of
the problem, or possibly the mailcap line created by the zgv file.
>
The following bug reports *must* be fixed before the current frozen Debian
distribution can progress further in its development cycle. Reminders have
been sent to the maintainers of these packages but some of the packages with
older bugs could probably use some assistance.
Package Name Bug #
> > defrag32731 defrag: e2dump quits with
> > check_block_location:6678674146834 [16] (Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>
> I thought that the bug submitter and the package maintainer have
> agreed to remove this package from slink and potato and place it
> into experimental.
Perhap
The following bug reports *must* be fixed before the current frozen Debian
distribution can progress further in its development cycle. Reminders have
been sent to the maintainers of these packages but some of the packages with
older bugs could probably use some assistance.
Package Name Bug #
The following bug reports *must* be fixed before the current frozen Debian
distribution can progress further in its development cycle. Reminders have
been sent to the maintainers of these packages but some of the packages with
older bugs could probably use some assistance.
Package Name Bug #
The following bug reports *must* be fixed before the current frozen Debian
distribution can progress further in its development cycle. Reminders have
been sent to the maintainers of these packages but some of the packages with
older bugs could probably use some assistance.
Package Name Bug #
> > Hmmm... If things were installed by hand ("dpkg --install dpkglib...")
> > or if install were to fail between the two packages, then you could have
> > a problem where the install tool doesn't function, right?
>
> Right. But since libdpkg is still a part of the dpkg package we
> shouldn't nee
> > > Previously Brian White wrote:
> > > > apache32204 user directories allow symlinks to other files
> > > > [0] (Johnie Ingram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> > >
> > > We should just force SymLinksIfOwnerMatch for /home to solve
> > You know, I don't see this as "grave". It means that a user can
> > effectively "export to the world" any file readable by www-data. In
> > general, this means only things that can be read by public. So,
> > the user can't intentionally export anything that he/she couldn't already
> > do by
> Previously Brian White wrote:
> > apache32204 user directories allow symlinks to other files [0]
> > (Johnie Ingram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>
> We should just force SymLinksIfOwnerMatch for /home to solve this.
You know, I don't see this as &q
The following bug reports *must* be fixed before the current frozen Debian
distribution can progress further in its development cycle. Reminders have
been sent to the maintainers of these packages but some of the packages with
older bugs could probably use some assistance.
Package Name Bug #
The following bug reports *must* be fixed before the current frozen Debian
distribution can progress further in its development cycle. Reminders have
been sent to the maintainers of these packages but some of the packages with
older bugs could probably use some assistance.
Package Name Bug #
rl regexp code hangs [0] (Michael Alan Dorman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
makepasswd31059 makepasswd: --clear=PASS can be seen with ps [20]
(Johnie Ingram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
netscape-base-40 30878 netscape-base-407: Security vulnerabilities in 4.07
[26] (Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROT
htdig 25412 htdig: htdig ignores config file stuff/absolute
pathnames compiled in [70] (Gergely Madarasz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
infocom 21478 infocom: Integrating infocom interpreters [175]
(Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
jdk1.127097 jdk1.1: error in insta
The following bug reports *must* be fixed before the current frozen Debian
distribution can progress further in its development cycle. Reminders have
been sent to the maintainers of these packages but some of the packages with
older bugs could probably use some assistance.
Package Name Bug #
The following bug reports *must* be fixed before the current frozen Debian
distribution can progress further in its development cycle. Reminders have
been sent to the maintainers of these packages but some of the packages with
older bugs could probably use some assistance.
Package Name Bug #
y
Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
ftp.debian.org24355 ftp.debian.org: please remove libatalk-dev [0] (Guy
Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
ilu-javadev 24351 ilu-javadev: depends on stuff outside of main [0]
(Klee Dienes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
infocom 23563 infocom: /usr
rmissions bug on /lib and /tmp [8]
(debian-devel@lists.debian.org)
infocom 23563 infocom: /usr/doc/infocom/copyright doesn't include a
licence [17] (Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
ircd 23951 ircd: postisnt does not check for errors [0] (Johnie
Ingram <
23809 Emacsen add-on packages must depend on emacsen, not
emacsen-common. [0] (Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
infocom 23563 infocom: /usr/doc/infocom/copyright doesn't include a
licence [10] (Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
libc6 20714 Current l
sniffit from main to
non-free [16] (Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
ftp.debian.org23327 Please remove javalex from hamm [9] (Guy Maor <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>)
ftp.debian.org23668 kernel-image-2.0.34: crc error [0] (Guy Maor <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>)
ftp.debian.org23684
> > The following bug reports *must* be fixed before the current frozen Debian
> > distribution can progress further in its development cycle. Reminders have
> > been sent to the maintainers of these packages yet nothing has been done to
> ^
The following bug reports *must* be fixed before the current frozen Debian
distribution can progress further in its development cycle. Reminders have
been sent to the maintainers of these packages yet nothing has been done to
remedy these bugs.
Package Name Bug # Bug Description [days old]
The following bug reports *must* be fixed before the current frozen Debian
distribution can progress further in its development cycle. Reminders have
been sent to the maintainers of these packages yet nothing has been done to
remedy these bugs.
Package Name Bug # Bug Description [days old]
> > > > egcc 17768 libc6 bug in mathematical functions [114]
> > > > (Galen Hazelwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> > >
> > > Fixing this bug exceeds my capabilities. I have send a message to the
> > > egcs-bugs list asking them to look into the current reports, but have
> > > received no
> > egcc 17768 libc6 bug in mathematical functions [114] (Galen
> > Hazelwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>
> Fixing this bug exceeds my capabilities. I have send a message to the
> egcs-bugs list asking them to look into the current reports, but have
> received no responses.
Would it be
The following bug reports *must* be fixed before the current frozen Debian
distribution can progress further in its development cycle. Reminders have
been sent to the maintainers of these packages yet nothing has been done to
remedy these bugs.
Package Name Bug # Bug Description [days old]
rbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
makepatch 21563 makepatch: use of /tmp/*$$* in an insecure fashion
[28] (Roderick Schertler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
mgetty-fax 9273 mgetty-fax: faxspool can't create lock file for
several users! [384] (Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED
The following bug reports *must* be fixed before the current frozen Debian
distribution can progress further in its development cycle. Reminders have
been sent to the maintainers of these packages yet nothing has been done to
remedy these bugs.
Package Name Bug # Bug Description [days old]
main [11]
(Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
g++ 21122 g++: eg++ doesn't compile programs accepted by g++ [0]
(Galen Hazelwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
gcc 19453 altgcc still vulnerable to /tmp symlink attack. [58]
(Galen Hazelwood <[EMAIL PROT
(Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
21041: ftp.debian.org - ftp.debian.org: please orphan libnatali properly [18]
(Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
21046: boot-floppies- bootfloppies: arch all package with arch specific
dependencies [18] (Enrique Zanardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
21089: emacse
1: ftp.debian.org - ftp.debian.org: please orphan libnatali properly [11]
(Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
21046: boot-floppies- bootfloppies: arch all package with arch specific
dependencies [11] (Enrique Zanardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
21089: emacsen-common - emacs-package-{in
> >The following bug reports *must* be fixed before the current frozen Debian
> >distribution can progress further in its development cycle. Reminders have
> >been sent to the maintainers of these packages yet nothing has been done to
> >remedy these bugs.
>
> >21106: postgresql -
27;t be in
frozen [0] (Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
21040: ftp.debian.org - ftp.debian.org: please orphan fcgi-devel-kit properly
[0] (Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
21041: ftp.debian.org - ftp.debian.org: please orphan libnatali properly [0]
(Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Elvis is indeed no longer in hamm. How do I get elvis completely
> removed from the bug tracking system (which has my email address from
> a couple of years ago per the old stable version of elvis), and listed
> as orphined, redundant, with an upstream maintainer that ignores us
> completely? I
20361: emacs20 - Input of \"a, \"A, \"o and \"O
doesn't work on tty [11] (Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
20396: boot-floppies- boot-floppies: After configuring the PCMCIA section,
modconf doesn't find modules [11] (Enrique Zanardi <[EMAIL
> > If "sortmail" is still showing up, then the email address must still be
> > wrong in the Maintainers file (as of 2 days ago). When did you upload the
> > fixed package?
>
> It was just installed at about the time I received your report.
It should be corrected by now, then. To be sure, a day
> > Here is the list of failed maintainer addresses from the last "ping" I
> > did. Sorry it took so long to post.
>
> I thought we already had a report?
Did I? I don't remember sending it. Must be that acute old age setting
in!
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> This was a typo for the sortmai
> >ucbmpeg_playRaul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I'm surprised that this is even recognized as a package.
>
> The name certainly isn't a valid package name any more.
I don't actually process the name. It's just in the Maintainers file
with that address. Was that package still
Here is the list of failed maintainer addresses from the last "ping" I
did. Sorry it took so long to post.
If one of your packages is here, then your email address bounced mail
when sent to. There 3 common causes for this:
(1) the package is obsolete: If the package still exists in Bo then
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
19268: apache-ssl - apache-ssl: no-copyright-file LI#3 [16] (Christoph
Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
19272: at - at: no-copyright-file LI#7 [16] (Thomas Koenig
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
19273: vkeybd - vkeybd: no-copyright-file LI#9 [16] (T
The following maintainer addresses failed. Unless the maintainers speak
up, I think we can assume these packages to be obselete or orphaned.
Found 21 failed ping addresses.
(orphaned)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[E
Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 11309: boot-floppies- PCMCIA drivers not installable on 6-19
> rescue/driver floppies [246] (Enrique Zanardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
This is a problem with bo and not hamm. I tested hamm's rescue disk with
the pcmcia-modules
ng-file LI#5 [9]
(Ioannis Tambouras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
19271: asp - asp: md5sums-lists-nonexisting-file LI#6 [9] ()
19272: at - at: no-copyright-file LI#7 [9] (Thomas Koenig
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
19273: vkeybd - vkeybd: no-copyright-file LI#9 [9]
(Please avoid "reply all" on this message -- there are too many recipients.)
I've gotten much mail about this, so I thought I'd just respond to it all
at once.
First off, I'd like to appologize for the misunderstanding about the date.
When I said "it would be frozen on Monday", I meant that the f
I've removed the following packages from Hamm because they still have
critical, grave, or important bugs registered against them. To get them
back in the archive, simply upload a version to "frozen" that fixes _all_
of the open critical, grave, and important bugs registered against that
package.
The following bug reports *must* be fixed before the current unstable Debian
distribution can progress further in its development cycle. Reminders have
been sent to the maintainers of these packages yet nothing has been done to
remedy these bugs.
Bug # Package Name Bug Description [days ol
close 12230
reassign 14361 remind
reassign 14541 mpg123
reassign 14842 chord
reassign 14849 sniffit
reassign 14851 gettyps
reassign 14855 doc++
reassign 14906 xinetd
reassign 14946 xsnow
reassign 14947 xtet42
reassign 14952 cqcam
reassign 14953 elvis
reassign 14956 spim
reassign 15125 picon-misc
re
e Dienes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
18453: ipac - ipac: error initializing [12] (Hamish Moffatt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
18494: smail- memory leak affecting xmcd and smail [9] (Soenke
Lange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
18572: nonus.debian.org - nonus.debian.org: remove de
The following bug reports *must* be fixed before the current unstable Debian
distribution can progress further in its development cycle. Reminders have
been sent to the maintainers of these packages yet nothing has been done to
remedy these bugs.
Bug # Package Name Bug Description [days ol
PROTECTED]>)
16028: ftp.debian.org - chinese-big5 is not free software [64] (Guy Maor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
16032: ftp.debian.org - vic-cqcam is not DFSG free and has a bad copyright
file [64] (Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
16178: xserver-svga - xserver-svga: xserver thinks
ROTECTED]>)
16004: pgp-i- pgp-i: coredumps when adding debian keyring [58]
(Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
16028: ftp.debian.org - chinese-big5 is not free software [58] (Guy Maor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
16032: ftp.debian.org - vic-cqcam is not DFSG free and ha
ring [49]
(Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
16178: xserver-svga - xserver-svga: xserver thinks my monitor is 390mm x
305mm [45] ([EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark W. Eichin))
16222: mime-support - install-mime does not work properly (?). [43] (Brian
White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
16287:
16004: pgp-i- pgp-i: coredumps when adding debian keyring [45]
(Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
16178: xserver-svga - xserver-svga: xserver thinks my monitor is 390mm x
305mm [40] ([EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark W. Eichin))
16222: mime-support - install-mime does not work pr
The following bug reports *must* be fixed before the current unstable Debian
distribution can progress further in its development cycle. Reminders have
been sent to the maintainers of these packages yet nothing has been done to
remedy these bugs.
Bug # Package Name Bug Description [days ol
This nag message regarding a critical bug failed. It looks like we'll
have to take care of it somehow.
Brian
( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
---
Mana
This nag message regarding a critical bug failed. It looks like we'll
have to take care of it somehow.
Brian
( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
---
Tired o
The following package has been istalled in bo-updates.
> dosfstools_1.0-11_i386.changes
> Changes: dosfstools (1.0-11) stable; urgency=low, closes=16493 16494 16490
> 16491
> * Applied patches to source files from Juan Cespedes which got lost in
> the last upload (Bug#16493, Bug#16494, Bug#
> > If one of your packages is listed here, please fix it asap. If they
> > remain bad after a couple months, we'll have to assume they have been
> > orphaned.
> >
> > Found 24 failed ping addresses.
> [.. snip snip ..]
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]/org
>
> Cool, a slash instead of a dot. But now watc
The following email addresses turned up bad or were said to be going away.
The packages they affect need to be fixed in hamm.
If one of your packages is listed here, please fix it asap. If they
remain bad after a couple months, we'll have to assume they have been
orphaned.
Found 24 failed ping a
I've installed the following into bo-updates:
isdnutils_2.1.beta1-15_i386.changes
Changes: isdnutils (1:2.1.beta1-15) unstable; urgency=low
- the version in bo is broken : it does not work with 2.0.29/30 kernel.
- the last bo version was 2.0-7 or so, all other version did never go
into bo, we
64 matches
Mail list logo
