>
> This bug doesn't seem to be fixed. When I look at the page:
>
> http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/maintainer.php?name=gabedit
>
> it still says:
>
> Debian Version: 2.0.11
>
> instead of:
>
> Debian Version: 2.0.11-1
>
> and the copyright link is still broken (tested with lynx and iceweasel)
Actually i use in Dehs a simple function (dpkg based) to see if the
package is updated against upstream:
function is_updated ($up_vers,$debian_vers) {
if ($up_vers=='') return 0;
passthru("dpkg --compare-versions '$up_vers' eq '" .
vers_conv($debian_vers) . "'",$great);
if ($great!=0) return 1;
el
Seems to be fixed now. Please check it so i could close this bug.
Ste
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As always many developers tell that watch file need to be maintained in an
external system.
Actually Dehs is based on watch file founded in official debian packages and
on the automatically generated watch file (for packages that doesn't have
one).
All this data are in a postgres db on alioth and s
Hi,
you can still check the global situation here:
http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/no_updated.html
Cheers,
Stefano
--
Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f
Sponsor:
Viaggi, voli, soggiorni...cattura l'offerta e parti con Mondolastminute
Clicca qui: http://
Hi,
here[1] there are 890 (see the last column in the table) automatically
generated and uscan checked watch file for packages that don't have
included one.
Naturally it needs a manual check before insert this watch file in
packages.
Could we do any action for let maintainers to adopt this watch fi
Dehs data is fully updated now with new debian version conversion
function.
Please check result now and see if we can close this bug.
Cheers,
Stefano
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok.. i tried to apply this patch (i commented the old version of the
function).
Seems quite good.
For the whole Dehs system data update we will wait Sunday for the
regular alioth cron dehs run.
Cheers,
Ste
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Sorry for dsfg typo in regex, the Dehs version control code is on
svn.debian.org.
I attend the Justin and Thijs agree on a common patch to this function.
Please consider the debian general packages number situation and user
cases and not only packages that you maintain :)
Cheers,
Stefano
--
>
> Still, a part of the bug here could still be addressed. What is needed is to
> scan for a dash from the end of the version string, and separate it there
> into 'debian revision' and 'upstream'.
>
> E.g. this version number:
> 1.4.6-20060409-1
> should be split in upstream '1.4.6-20060409' a
>
> Still, a part of the bug here could still be addressed. What is needed is to
> scan for a dash from the end of the version string, and separate it there
> into 'debian revision' and 'upstream'.
>
> E.g. this version number:
> 1.4.6-20060409-1
> should be split in upstream '1.4.6-20060409'
> No it's not, have a look at
> http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/maintainer.php?name=fetchmail
> Cheers
> Nico
It is not an alioth or dehs problem is a berlios one.
Have u never tried to whet wget
http://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=1824 from an
alioth account?
Problably berl
We need to have more statistical data about debian and upstream strange
version numbering to do a better comparison. For example there is no
standard way to cvs and svn version naming in debian.
Cheers,
Ste
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
Please could you verify if this bug is still valid?
It seems fixed.. so we will close it.
Cheers,
Ste
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
After some code revision i think that dehs data now are regular update
again.
Anybody could list all update dehs/developer.php/watch column outdate
bugs agains dehs and qa so we try to close it?
Cheers,
Ste
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
> Yes, sort of:
>
> function is_updated ($up_vers, $debian_vers) {
> if ($up_vers=='') return 0;
> if (!(($debian_vers =~ /\d+\.?/) && ($up_vers =~ /\d+\.?/))) return 0;
> ...
> }
>
> I did some tests and I think that the results of the regex match above
> are flexible enough to not break a
Hi Gustavo,
>
>
> What about the false positives like gdm and gnome-screensaver?
>
That page list debian package not in sync with upstream. So if a debian
package has not a well done watch file probably we could have a debian
version more new that the upstream one. I suggest to send a bug with a
Hi,
after etch release this is a list of debian packages not in sync with
upstream version[1] with upstream news or changelog data where available
(click on the upstream version number). Packages are sorted with popcon
data.
I have also set the dehs "live" project directory on alioth readable for
I think that dehs data are regular available now (a part from BTS
upstream bug count because bts is quite slow actually for a big query so
i disabled it).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Il giorno gio, 04/05/2006 alle 17.13 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst ha scritto:
> On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 16:18 +0200, Bluefuture wrote:
> > Hi,
> > the last upload of fpc was on upstream version 2.0 on 2005-09-09[1].
> > Actually the upstream version is 2.0.2 relased on 2005-12-08[2]
Hi,
the last upload of fpc was on upstream version 2.0 on 2005-09-09[1].
Actually the upstream version is 2.0.2 relased on 2005-12-08[2] and here we can
find upstream bug fix and changes[3].
Anybody knows the status of his maintainer?
Cheers,
Stefano
[1]http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/fpc.htm
Hi,
the last upload of mma was on upstream version 0.12 on 22-02-2005[1].
Actually the upstream version is 0.21, so in debian we have missed
around 9 upstream version. Anybody know the status of his maintainer?
Cheers,
Stefano
[1]http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mma.html
[2]http://users.xplornet.c
> > http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/ the nirvana asks the tester's question
> > "why the dd isn't packaging current upstream software ?"
>
> No, it doesn't. It answers the question of whether the version in
> unstable appears to be up to date, which is a completely different
> question.
>
It also
Interesting project Jeroen.
Is this framework eventually could support "third party" submitted watch
file for maintaining watch file in a place external to the package
itself?
It could be useful for dehs[1] and integrating dehs data in this
framework.
Cheers,
Stefano
[1]http://dehs.alioth.debia
For who is interested about a recent research on email flaming - do we
know something about this issue on debian mailing lists?! ;) - i suggest
this Pdf[1]: "Egocentrism Over E-Mail: Can We Communicate as Well as We
Think?"
Cheers,
Stefano
[1] http://gsbwww.uchicago.edu/fac/nicholas.epley/Krugere
> It is still nice to be able to see the live code with all temporary
> files etc. (An additional plus is that I can just 'cat .svn/entries'
> to see where the svn root is.) At the moment I can't do that.
>
> [0] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/lib/gforge/chroot/home/users/evaso-guest $cd
> projects/
> -b
Il giorno mar, 14/03/2006 alle 16.17 +0100, Christoph Berg ha scritto:
>
> Could you chmod +rx the dehs code on haydn please? (Why is this
> running in your $HOME at all instead of the web root?)
>
The dehs code is already available to all on svn.debian.org.
The live program is running on my ho
I had seen some thread about problem with dehs and the qa pages.
Actually i'm maintaining the dehs data and scripts.
There was some problem on dehs in the past months about unavailability
of changelog data on packages.debian.org.
Actually i'm using packages.debian.net as source of changelog data
The problem of this bugs is in ext_watch() (a dehs function) that seem
doesn't catch watch file in some cases. This function try extract the
watch file from the diff.gz of the package name submitted.
The function is quite simple and seems that doesn't work for package
that already have a watch fil
I have upgraded today dehs system to use the last official released
version of uscan in devscripts package 2.6.10. So it now support the
same features that uscan 2.6.10
Cheers,
Stefano
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
Finally dehs is resurrected and updated after some problems derived by
alioth sarge upgrade. Dehs still Need to be compilant with the official
version of uscan in last devscript package because actually it uses a
badly hacked version of uscan3.pl so it doesn't support type 3 watch
file.
If anybody
> indeed, qa.d.o dehs data files are dated Jun 5 and the same applies for
> data on alioth, dated Jun 6
>
> this can be related to non-us becoming obsolete, the logs shows that
> dehs failed to fetch Release from non-us/unstable
Yes, non-us is the problem. I have tried to fix it quick as i can
I had opened a dehs[1] development mailing list[2] on alioth to
coordinate issues and work.
Anybody want discuss ideas, improve or work on dehs an watch file system
could subscribe to the list[3].
Thanks,
Stefano
[1] http://dehs.alioth.debian.org
[2] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[3] http://lists.alioth.deb
>The community might start considering it less useless if an
>explanation of what it is supposed to be good for was actually
>available. In particular, why should a maintainer care about watch
>files if he uses something else than uscan to keep track of upstream
>happenings?
>From time to time, th
After another gruelling discussion on #debian-devel about the useless of
dehs and the lack of watch file (75,60% of non native debian packages
doesn't had one), I think that dehs is start to begin only my own
personal toys, so i'm thinking to stop it and to leave alioth resources
and put my develop
>What do you do with packages that have uncooperative upstream and thus
>a watch file is not possible?
>
>apg's web host, for example, doesn't support directory listings, so I
>had to resort on checking the fingerprint of the download web page to
>find out whether there is a new release.
>
>Greetin
Il giorno mer, 26-01-2005 alle 09:02 +0100, Free Ekanayaka ha scritto:
> Thanks for this effort.
>
> Would it make sense to support queries of dehs by maintainer email
> address?
>
> This ways it would be easier for people to check the status of their
> own packages.
This functionality is
Il giorno mar, 25-01-2005 alle 13:56 +0100, Wouter Verhelst ha scritto:
> I'm not convinced having a watch file is always useful.
>
I agree with you.
> I would hope a maintainer would follow the announcements of the software
I agree with this. Dehs/Watch is not a system for bypassing upstream
ma
Il giorno mar, 25-01-2005 alle 07:49 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow ha
scritto:
> Bluefuture <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The dehs system now is regular running again every two days on alioth
> > (and so also on the info feed to developer.php on qa).
> > Looking
The dehs system now is regular running again every two days on alioth
(and so also on the info feed to developer.php on qa).
Looking at no_watch page[1] there are:
Total source packages without watch file: 6324
Total source packages: 8285
%: 76,33%
But seems also that there are:
1621 package
Il giorno mar, 21-12-2004 alle 09:30 +0100, Peter Eisentraut ha scritto:
> I wrote:
> > I think the "watch" columns on developer.php have stopped updating
> > some time ago.
>
> I think this may have to do with queries on
> http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/ taking "forever". Perhaps the database
>
Hi,
actually this is the function that try to convert debian version in a
"compatible" format before debian vs upstream test. If u had any good
idea to improve it try to post something over debian qa mailing list:
Cheers,
--
funct
Had u try to look at the wwiz (the automatic generated watch file)?
version=2
ftp://ftp-sop.inria.fr/mimosa/fp/Bigloo/bigloo-?_?([\w+\d+\.]+|\d+)(\.tar|\.tgz)(\.gz|\.bz2|)
debian uupdate
Package name is bigloo, dehs doesn't had find a watch file source package and
it tried to generate autmatica
It is available now on http://dehs.alioth.debian.org the html version of
- man uscan - that describes the Watch file format.
Dehs, for upstream version, uses an hacked version (but 100% error
message and watch format compatible) of uscan (you can find this tool in
devscripts debian
package).
This
Il mer, 2004-07-28 alle 14:38, Pierre Machard ha scritto:
> I took a look at your project, and I do not understand why when I am
> looking for information about po4a I am seeing debian/copyright ?
>
Because this package doesn't has a Watch file. Dehs Wwiz tried to
generate one from you copyright
Il mer, 2004-07-28 alle 16:08, Gürkan Sengün ha scritto:
Hi
> at dehs.alioth.debian.org in you have a typo debain->debian
Fixed
> let me suggest for WWiz Up. that it is case insensitive, is that possible
> (allow any case in href)?
> this would remove most "error"s from
> http://qa.debian.org/[
Hi,
if you want to fill a watch file or u want to fix your Dehs status[1]
please, for upstream software on sf.net doesn't use
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/.
For example egroupware:
version=2
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/egroupware/eGroupWare-(.*).tar.gz
But it is better (so it can re
Il sab, 2004-07-24 alle 12:12, Igor Genibel ha scritto:
>Sorry, the link are:
>http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/debian_qa_unstable.db
>http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/debian_qa_experimental.db
>And are complatible with the db module in php4 on merkel (db2).
Sorry again :) but i must to keep a bed :)
Th
Il sab, 2004-07-24 alle 12:12, Igor Genibel ha scritto:
> Le vendredi 23 Juillet 2004 21:47, Bluefuture a écrit :
> [...]
> > Databases needed and daily updated are here:
> > http://alioth.debian.org/debian_qa_unstable.db
> > http://alioth.debian.org/debian_qa_experime
Sorry, was missing the bug number that this patch close.
So I tink that #26111 patch close #228394.
Followup-For: Bug #206363
Package: qa.debian.org
Tags: Patch
This patch close this bug and introduces some dehs[1] data in
developer.wml.
Databases needed and daily updated are here:
http://alioth.debian.org/debian_qa_unstable.db
http://alioth.debian.org/debian_qa_experimental.db
and must to go
Il mer, 2004-07-21 alle 11:13, Erik Schanze ha scritto:
> >
> @Stefano: Would you include the possibility of following links to download
> area
> into your script?
I don't think it is a good solution. The typology of "download area" url
is too various. But, also if we can standardize the typolog
Il mar, 2004-07-13 alle 20:08, Robert Lemmen ha scritto:
> hi stefano,
>
> i really like dehs, i think it will become a very valuable tool in the
> future. i have some comments though:
>
> - is the code available anywhere?
Dehs source code is available here:
Browsable: http://svn.debian.org/vie
This is a little summary report about Dehs status of debian packages. I
hope it could be useful for debian community and Qa purposes. Do u think
that could be added in the DWN?
--
Top 10 Debian installed packages that are
Il mar, 2004-06-29 alle 03:56, Andrew Saunders ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> Please could you tell me where I can get my hands on a copy of the
> Watch Wizard source? I can't seem to find it on Alioth.
>
> Oh, and DEHS looks extremely promising. Keep up the good work! :-)
>
> --
> Andrew Saunders
Tanks,
Hi all,
I had added a (I hope) useful 3 features to dehs.
1. Maintainer summery, you can check the status of all your packages
with problems going to:
http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/maintainer.php?maint=
2. Upstream changelog for the package (if debian package is not in sync
with upstream version)
Hi,
I had added to DEHS http://dehs.alioth.debian.org a new functionality
about "by maintainer" dehs summary.
Try it and make suggestion.
Next step: dehs ovveride??
Colud be need some access restriction features for enter an overrided
watch file (and test)? How Maintainer will integrate it in t
>i have tried soemthing like that in the past too. you could add a test
>for a prdownloads.sf.net page with the projects' name, that will work
>for ~15% of all packages without watch files.
Now every "sf.net" "sourceforge.net" is composed as above. Dehs is now
restarted,
for generating outputs (n
Hi,
i had tried to implement a Watch filler function for dehs that run daily
on alioth[1].
There are 6510 package without watch file[1].
I had run "watch filler" on this packages for try to make an
automatically generated Watch from "Copyright" file of packages.
Now you can keep and try the watch f
>Hmmm, at least it is to hard for *me*, because I never successfully
>managed
>to get a working watch file. Well, the last time I tried was about two
>years ago. Something might have changed. I accept bug reports with patches
>to any of my packages where I'm not upstream.
For example For your p
> It's not that it's hard,
> it's that they're not interested.
Well, they doesn't want to think to a little regular expression for help Qa
Purposes?
Or the problem is that all the Debian developer think that Dehs is bootless for
helping
Debian-qa?
>Another reason why some packages don't have a
>Did you consider the possiblity that many package maintainers don't
>find
>the Watch file useful? Such things as:
>
>Upstream is package maintainer.
>
>Upstream development is dead.
>
>Package maintainer on upstream mailing list.
Ok, well. So the Watch file rationale could be switche
Il mar, 2004-05-04 alle 01:51, Jeroen van Wolffelaar ha scritto:
The main problem of DEHS is:
Total Soruces package without Watch File => 6437 (86,19%)
And we must add
Total Package without a checkable upstream => 484 (47.22% of package
with watch file)
Only 1075 on 7468 sources Packages had a "
Il sab, 2004-05-01 alle 16:18, Jeroen van Wolffelaar ha scritto:
>
> Bluefuture: The interface that is needed for DDPO and the PTS is like
> this:
>
> : [ | "N/A" | "Error" ]
>
> For resp. upstream version, no watch file, and error processing
> wat
and possibly the PTS. It would be brilliant to
> see this data for all my packages and all the gnome team's packages
> along with the usual bug data, versions, etc found on DDPO
>
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 07:20:57PM +0200, Bluefuture wrote:
> > Dehs source code is now avai
Dehs source code is now available on svn://svn.debian.org/dehs.
(Browse http://svn.debian.org/viewcvs/dehs/)
Statistcs (daily updated) are available on http://dehs.alioth.debian.org
Any suggestion, feature request, bugs submission and help are always welcome.
Regards,
Stefano Fabri
I published a first implementation of DEHS on http://dehs.alioth.debian.org
(auto-updated daily).
This could be a sort of Debian External Frontier Healt Status.
DEHS monitor and output some statistics about Watch file and the sync between
Debian (unstable/experimental) and author upstream
version
Take a look to this script:
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/points.html
This is something like my Proposal for an Advanced Debian QA System.
Others scripts here: http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/
Bye,
Blue
Il sab, 2004-02-21 alle 23:54, Adrian Bunk ha scritto:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:37:22PM +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
>
> > This are some idea for an advanced automatic Debian-qa system:
> >...
>
> It's a common misunderstanding that automatic tools would be able to
There is a ground problem for begin to work on my proposal and it is
well explained in this post from Filippo Giunchedi on debian QA ml:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2004/debian-qa-200401/msg00042.html
Il sab, 2004-02-21 alle 09:29, Matt Bonner ha scritto:
> I think the basic resistance you
The problem could be analyzed in this way.
There is the Debian Frontier composed by debian-developer/mantainers.
Outside the Debian Frontier there are the freesoftware developers.
Some debian-developer are freesoftware developers and some
debian-freesoftware-developer are at the same time the maint
Il sab, 2004-02-21 alle 00:00, Ben Burton ha scritto:
> > I'm not sure you can say it's always a bug for Debian's package to be
> > out-of-sync with the latest upstream release.
> >
> > For instance, there is a 2.x release of CPAN's HTML::FromText, which is
> > a complete rewrite by a new upstre
Il ven, 2004-02-20 alle 23:07, Goswin von Brederlow ha scritto:
> Bluefuture <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This are some idea for an advanced automatic Debian-qa system:
>
> I think the first action should be a reminder to the maintainer. If
> one has to check the w
This are some idea for an advanced automatic Debian-qa system:
The Debian-qa and debian devel could develop a system for trace all
upstream version of a software using the Debian/Watch file and uscan
tool and put this info in a db storing relase version, devel/stable
status of the new upstream rel
>From Mantas Kriaučiūnas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
on debian-gtk-gnome ml 10/2/2004:
Hi,
Are there any plans to release gdm for gnome 2.4 ?
Now debian has outdated version for Gnome 2.2 - look at
http://www.jirka.org/gdm.html - "2.4.1.x are the GNOME2.2 stable
versions,[..] 2.4.4.x are the GNOME 2.4 st
75 matches
Mail list logo
