Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Unacknowledged NMU for > one year, either update or remove:
>
>Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> gccchecker Build-Depends: gcc-2.95
I recently filed a request to have this package removed. It is
not maintained
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-14 21:20]:
>> reassign 227738 qa.debian.org
>> > These packages depend on emacs20 and are designed to work only with
>> > emacs20.
>> > emacs20 has just been removed.
>> >
>> > The functionality of these pac
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Could you roll out a 2.57d package into experimental, then? Some GNU
> projects, like libtool, already require autoconf 2.58 for bootstrapping
> from CVS.
Okay, that's easy enough. It's in incoming now.
--
On Perl: "It's as if H.P. Lovecraft, returned
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 02:30:37PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > As you most certainly know, the autoconf team is going to release 2.58
> > > very
&
Package: custom
Version: 1.9962-4
custom doesn't properly initialize itself, probably because it
lacks a site-start file. I think this was probably a simple
mistake during the Debianization; the changelog.Debian says this:
custom (1.9962-4) unstable; urgency=low
* Fix qa address.
* custom-i
I've removed the following packages from Hamm because they still have
critical, grave, or important bugs registered against them. To get them
back in the archive, simply upload a version to "frozen" that fixes _all_
of the open critical, grave, and important bugs registered against tha
6 matches
Mail list logo
