Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: debsources
This URL results in an Internal Server Error:
https://sources.debian.net/patches/linux/3.2.78-1/
When I reported this outside the BTS, I got these replies:
On Wed, 2017-10-04 at 08:11 +0100, Ores
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: important
(Severity set to important because this is a regression from the
current PTS.)
The architecture list for linux on tracker.debian.org is:
amd64 armel armhf i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 s390x sparc all
whereas on the PTS it is:
all al
or version 3.16 with Debian patches
But this is still not a very sensible summary of the source package.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers. - Leonard Brandwein
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, 2012-08-12 at 18:09 +, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 06:56:38PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-08-12 at 17:47 +, Bart Martens wrote:
> > > I have monitored this for a month, and I see that all mentors.xml files
> > > are
s is always right,
e.g. might be a stable update be prepared on mentors.d.n?)
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Sturgeon's Law: Ninety percent of everything is crap.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
In response to comments on #636010, I'm trying to add static news for
linux-2.6, linux-kbuild-2.6 and linux-latest-2.6 about their being
renamed. I tried:
"""
Subject: linux-2.6 source package renamed
Package: linux-2.6
URL: http://packages.qa.debian.org/
against bts.debian.org (I didn't find the above
> things mentioned by now)
>
> THanks a lot and all the best
--
Ben Hutchings
The two most common things in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 18:26 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> thanks for the answers, but ...
>
> On Mo, 14 Mai 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > * bug 670494 filed against ptex-bin, which is currently maintained
> > > by debian-tex-maint mailing
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
The page for wireless-regdb currently shows:
todo
mentors.debian.net has version 2009.11.25-1 of this package, you should
consider sponsoring its upload.
But the current version is newer than that.
Ben.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy
Hilaire,
You are listed as the maintainer of drgeo and drgeo-doc in Debian, but
you have not updated either for over 3 years and have not been handling
bug reports.
Do you intend to take up maintenance again, or should these packages be
orphaned?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
It is impossible to make
doing this only if maintainer does not match
"@lists\.(alioth\.)?debian\.org$"?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Klipstein's 4th Law of Prototyping and Production:
A fail-safe circuit will destroy others.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 13:10 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> (2) the way we deal with bugs affecting two (or more) packages.
> That's a tricky problem. On one hand, the correct way to solve that
> would be to have a separate "affected_packages" table, with (id,
> package) columns, and also an "affec
eliminate the false warnings.
More generally, where packages don't use -Wall for compiling C and C++
code, add this option and see what happens. If it produces warnings
about broken code, file bugs. If it produces false warnings, disable
them selectively. Then file a (minor) bug to r
13 matches
Mail list logo
