Bug#709063: developer.php: Show buildd status

n DDPO, contrary to best practices. -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#702924: qa.debian.org: DDPO does not always show DM permissions given

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, it looks like the DDPO does not always show given DM permissions. I don't really know why, but sometimes given ACLs aren't shown. My DDPO [1] for example lacks at very least ipset [2], to which I granted Neutron permissions to upload [3]. Others lack

Bug#694009: qa.debian.org: Please include suite version information in RDF meta data

On 25.02.2013 19:37, Olivier Berger wrote: > I hope this will suit most people's needs. It fits mine, thanks for your work! I'm looking forward to have this code live so that I can write my code parsing it. (forwarding to the bug, I reply-failed in my MUA) -- with kind regards,

Re: Bug#694009: qa.debian.org: Please include suite version information in RDF meta data

On 25.02.2013 19:37, Olivier Berger wrote: > I hope this will suit most people's needs. It fits mine, thanks for your work! I'm looking forward to have this code live so that I can write my code parsing it. -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC

Forward bug mail through the PTS for bug reports to Debian mailing lists

[resent because lists.d.o does not like subjects containing "subscribe" ...] Hello, for background of thos not being aware: Sponsorships requests are handled through the BTS since a while now. For that we established a sponsorship-requests [1] pseudo-package. This package got the debian-mentors

Bug#694009: qa.debian.org: Please include suite version information in RDF meta data

parsing XML. [1] > http://www-public.telecom-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/weblog/2012/08/29/debian-package-tracking-system-now-produces-rdf-description-of-source-packages/ [2] http://people.debian.org/~zack/pts/soap/ -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#694009: qa.debian.org: Please include suite version information in RDF meta data

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist The RDF pages for a package in the BTS contains lots of machine-readable information about the package. However, it misses the information from the versions column (i.e. the current version of a package told apart per suite). It would be super handy to ha

Re: Hijacking^W^W^W^W^W^WSalvaging packages for fun and profit: A proposal

velopers agreed for the opened case. I don't think that's desired or realistic. * How would you validate binding votes on a salvage process? You would need to require to send signed mails to the list for seconding. Otherwise we did not win anything over votes allowed by anyone. -- wit

Re: Hijacking^W^W^W^W^W^WSalvaging packages for fun and profit: A proposal

intent to salvage/hijack a package, wait if people complain loud enough. We would still be in a legal gray area, where it is not clear whether one is allowed to salvage a package from a bad maintainership. I think the most important rationale is to get people not to be afraid to take over packag

Re: Hijacking^W^W^W^W^W^WSalvaging packages for fun and profit: A proposal

Hi Bernhard, I appreciate your comments and I fully agree with them, now that you raised your questions. On 28.09.2012 22:12, Bernhard R. Link wrote: > * Arno Töll [120928 18:48]: >> Reasons to salvage a package >> >> The package is

Re: Hijacking^W^W^W^W^W^WSalvaging packages for fun and profit: A proposal

2012/09/msg00050.html [2] http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/MIATeam -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Hijacking^W^W^W^W^W^WSalvaging packages for fun and profit: A proposal

Hi Jakub, On 28.09.2012 19:47, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Arno Töll , 2012-09-28, 18:48: >> Packages being marked as orphaned, or those being up for adoption can >> be immediately taken over. > > If a package is RFA-ed (as opposed to O-ed), the maintainer retains all > the usu

Hijacking^W^W^W^W^W^WSalvaging packages for fun and profit: A proposal

] http://penta.debconf.org/dc12_schedule/events/926.en.html [7] https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2012/07/msg3.html [8] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681833 -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#688446: qa.debian.org: Please update DDPO and PTS in view of the new DM procedures

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: important Hello, on behalf of ftpmasters, Ansgar announced changes regarding the DM upload permission handling. In particular, the DMUA control field is not used anymore, instead control messages shall be used. Effective upload permissions are documented in [2],

Re: DUCK - the Debian Url Checker

liated project: Where is the source code? :> -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Orphaning php-codesniffer, then take it over by the PHP PEAR team

ppen *now* beyond the bare essential minimum to improve the user experience in Wheezy. -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Orphaning php-codesniffer, then take it over by the PHP PEAR team

-- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: svn commit fails with Permission denied

rds, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Checks for urls in packages - extend lintian

arball itself. -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: on package removal notifications

e who want to get rid about a package and those who possibly want to safe a package. Just as a random idea, maybe someone comes up with something better which would allow a graceful removal. -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D signa

Bug#624227: packages.qa.debian.org: Links to obsolete and non-existent version on mentors.debian.net

upgrade (whenever it might come), so it is probably not worth to work around our laziness at the PTS side anyway. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using

Bug#634927: Acknowledgement (gen-orphaned includes duplicates and closed bugs)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This time with patch (attached) - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http

Bug#634927: gen-orphaned includes duplicates and closed bugs

. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOJ2PsAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNt6twP/3ig9A/L3+DZaouRhb1RvlcI

Bug#633785: Remaining wnpp-* scripts won't work anymore (dak and bts2ldap is missing)

data/wnpp/wnpp-disposable?view=markup [3] http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/qa/trunk/data/wnpp/wnpp-lint?view=markup [4] http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/qa/trunk/data/wnpp/wnpp-publicize?view=markup - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D

RFS: [QA upload] snowdrop

one could sponsor this QA upload. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJODIKIAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtigs

Bug#632092: Orphaned packages list is outdated (with patch)

x: x._age, reverse=True ): # sort by age: - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

Bug#632092: Orphaned packages list is outdated (with patch)

ta/wnpp/wnpp.py?view=markup [3] http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/qa/trunk/data/wnpp/gen-orphaned?view=markup [4] ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/indices/Maintainers - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuP