On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 01:47:34PM +0200, William Desportes wrote:
Also: the Debian tracker page says unknown maintainer.
Yeah, the orphaning upload broke the Maintainer field.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 06:28:30PM +0300, Md. Moniruzzaman Tanim wrote:
Monir here. I am from Oulu, Finland. I work as a QA specialist at a Nordic
Bank. I want to join your Debian QA team. Could you please let me know the
process?
There is no process and there is no formal QA team.
--
WBR, wRA
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 11:26:16AM +, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote:
I can confirm that the bug still exists.
There was also no Django bug report opened about it, as mentioned
before.
So what need to be done to repair the RSS feed?
I don't know Django and also don't know Debian's internal server
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 06:51:02PM +, RV Ramanan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been a long time GNU/Linux user- since 2001. However, my user has been
> mostly installing various distributions and using the laptops as my daily
> workhorse or just for fun.
>
> I am not a great programmer and I coul
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 10:20:58PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can the nuitka package be removed from debian?
>
> It hasn't worked in a long time. The maintainer seems MIA.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035782#30
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: P
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 10:16:55PM +0100, Patrice Duroux wrote:
>
> so could I suggest to consider the following packages:
>
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/sump-logicanalyzer - 2011-07-27
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libvirt-tck - 2011-11-13
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dtc - 2012-06-08
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 06:19:52PM +0200, Ben Tris wrote:
> Thought make an bug to qa because seen #1060305
Not sure what's the logic here.
> In short:
> The source seems unmaintained, an update can support certain devices
> with one also for users with disabilities.
There is already a bug repor
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 03:52:23PM +0200, Uwe Steinmann wrote:
> Am Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 03:21:41PM +0200 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen:
> >
> > Did anyone else see the emails 2023-12-03 and 2023-09-25 about SimulIDE?
> > Perhaps the original sender should get a reply from someone who know
> > what
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 03:21:41PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Did anyone else see the emails 2023-12-03 and 2023-09-25 about SimulIDE?
I even replied to one.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 10:37:07PM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have tried reaching out on a couple of the IRC channels and e-mailed
> some people directly but I'm not having much luck. How do I go about
> coming back and getting back in the keyring? I unfortunately didn't
> ever upd
On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 05:56:37PM -0400, André Locas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I live nearby Montreal, Quebec, Canada. I am not a developer neither a
> programmer.
>
> I am a retired Industrial Relations counselor and I was using/programming
> Excel and Calc doing Pay equity programs.
>
> If I can be of
On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 08:30:35PM +0200, Patrice Duroux wrote:
> Ok so this is probably due to the version of the DHs used when generating the
> postrm script during packaging.
How?
> On my system, the diversity is quite large regarding all the installed
> packages
> and the dh_installsystemd:
>
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 07:50:47AM +0200, Ben Tris wrote:
> Just a notice.
>
> I think debbugs is important, so thought send a message to debian-qa.
Well, I assume it's not important if it wasn't uploaded since 2018.
> Maybe debbugs can use some help.
I assume the software that runs on bugs.d.o i
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 08:08:39PM +0200, Ben Tris wrote:
> Just a notice.
>
> SimulIDE version 1.0.0 2023
> Debion simulide version 0.1.7 2018
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/simulide
Yeah, it looks eligible for salvaging.
That doesn't mean that anyone will do the work though.
On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 01:04:13PM +0200, Patrice Duroux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My starting point is:
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libxmp
> that does not show the new upstream 4.6.0 (since 2023-06-15)
> and UDD says also that upstream_version is 4.5.0 and not 4.6.0
I can also confirm that uscan insi
On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 08:45:37PM +0100, Patrice Duroux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am facing ^M (\r) character in the .build output file using sbuild
> on my system (Sid).
> For instance:
>
> $ file timidity_2.14.0-9_amd64-2023-03-18T18:33:37Z.build
> timidity_2.14.0-9_amd64-2023-03-18T18:33:37Z.build:
16 matches
Mail list logo