Bug#985404: qa.debian.org: Packages overview VCS field doesn't consider a debian/experimental branch

version as problematic. DEP-14 mentions debian/experimental and debian/unstable, but it shouldn't be an error to use debian/experimental as branch name even if using debian/master, right? Please inform me if it is simply user error. -- Andreas Rönnquist gus...@debian.org

Re: QA Uploads

eference say: "QA uploads are very much like normal maintainer uploads: they may fix anything, even minor issues; the version numbering is normal, and there is no need to use a delayed upload." https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu-qa-upload -- Andreas

Re: My recent bpo-uploads not appearing in my qa page

on #debian-qa if not. > Would it maybe be possible to add upload date, uploader and sponsor to the mouse-over text, just as if hovering the versions of the other uploads? (These are not links though). -- Andreas Rönnquist mailingli...@gusnan.se gus...@gusnan.se -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: request for help to fix common mistakes in wnpp bugs

On Thu, 7 Jun 2012 12:16:24 -0500 Nathan Handler wrote: > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 2:10 AM, Bart Martens wrote: > > I hereby request help from anyone (including non-DDs) to fix common > > mistakes in wnpp bugs. > > I just went through and did a batch of the ITP bugs without owners. It > looks li

Bug#581169: outdated sourceforge redirector

Problems with my package sciteproj's Sourceforge qa redirector again - 0.7.01 availible at ftp://ftp.heanet.ie/mirrors/download.sourceforge.net/pub/sourceforge/s/project/sc/sciteproj/ but not at http://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php/sciteproj/ best regards /Andreas signature.asc Description: PG

doing some gdevilspie work

make sure nobody is already working on it. (I hope this is the correct way to go about this - I am not a DD, but only a maintainer requiring sponsoring so far - and I guess that the process of doing QA work isn't done in a different way than other debian uploads.) best regards /Andrea