Re: Makeing Debian more secure - sign binaries with elfsign?

Heya, * Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20040503 09:20]: > On Friday 30 April 2004 15.25, Andreas Kotes wrote: > > What do you think? Signed binaries instead of tools like tripwire or > > aide et all? > > Solutions like tripwi

Re: Makeing Debian more secure - sign binaries with elfsign?

Heya, * Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20040503 01:58]: > On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 01:49:01AM +0200, Andreas Kotes wrote: > > * Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20040503 01:36]: > > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 03:25:59PM +0200, Andreas Kotes wrote: > > &g

Re: Makeing Debian more secure - sign binaries with elfsign?

Heya, * Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20040503 01:36]: > On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 03:25:59PM +0200, Andreas Kotes wrote: > > What do you think? Signed binaries instead of tools like tripwire or > > aide et all? > > Sounds interesting. How does elfsign go with pr

Makeing Debian more secure - sign binaries with elfsign?

compare on-disk and in-memory ELF files, too ... Kind regards, Count -- Andreas Kotes - ICQ: 3741366 - The views expressed herein are (only) mine! Follow the path of the unsafe, independent thinker. Expose your ideas to the danger of controversy. Speak your mind and fear less the label of &quo

Re: Removing libctk ?

Heya, * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20040207 17:02]: > On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 04:30:42PM +0100, Andreas Kotes wrote: > > * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20040207 15:52]: > > > I was looking at the list of RC bugs in orphaned packages

Re: Removing libctk ?

I think we should consider removing it. Comments? unless someone can point another decent console UI library, preferably also with GTK-style API, I'd opt for keeping it, as long as there is an active maintainer (at least for the package). Greetinx, Ccunt -- Andreas Kotes - ICQ: 3741366