Hi there!
Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Something weird happened with archive at the time of the testing, and
> the testing failed with:
>
> W: Failed to fetch
> gzip:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/piatti.debian.org_debian_dists_sid_main_binary-amd64_Packages
> Hash Sum mismatch
>
> Which really have noth
Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> I appreciate the effort you guys have put into this and while I
> actually hate seeing the idea of a QA meeting not being implemented, I
> understand the reasoning. Obviously, I am part of the reason why it
> didn't happen since I didn't speak up earlier or renewd my intenti
Ok, the orphan part is clear now :)
I am also not paying so much attention, it looks :)
Barry deFreese wrote:
> What error did you get?
cp -a ./debian/tmp/usr/lib/ggi/display/vgagl.so
debian/libggi-target-svgalib/usr/lib/ggi/display/
cp: cannot stat `./debian/tmp/usr/lib/g
Barry deFreese wrote:
> If someone has time to review and/or possibly upload I would appreciate it.
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libggi/libggi_2.2.2-1.dsc
This FTBFS for me. On the other hand, how did it become a QA package?
(just asking, no puns).
--
·''`. Come, let me si
Barry deFreese wrote:
> If someone has time to review and/or possibly upload I would appreciate it.
I will look at it if nobody else is already doing so.
Thanks for you effort.
--
·''`. Come, let me sing into your ear, those dancing days are gone
: :' : I carry the sun in a golden cup,
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Before the etch release, I did a few piuparts runs on all packages,
> and filed the resulting bugs. I'd like someone to take over that task
> for lenny.
Whoever takes up this task, please keep #322762 updated about findings
related to the /usr/doc symlink transition.
I can
The wiki page is now complete and updated.
I found this to be exhausting, fustrating and boring :(
http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoalRecommends
I would like to ask Luk (or other RM team member) to mail d-devel
requesting maintainers to fix their packages, help finding suitable
recommends substitu
I started a wiki page, then FranklinPiat fixed it (thx, I hate this wiki
syntax :) ) http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoalRecommends
I am now starting to add details there, as it is still very incomplete.
--
·''`. Fuck your fascist beauty standards
: :' :
`. `'
`-Prou
Amaya wrote:
> I will post about findings in testing tomorrow.
Testing:
http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=lenny&list=main%2donly%2drelationship%2dRecommends&arch=EVERY
(the ones in testing)
* poppler ghostscript
* printfilters-ppd lprng | lpr-ppd
* pyt
Rationale:
http://release.debian.org/lenny/goals.txt
# No unmet recommends relations inside main
Advocate: Luk Claes
Description: Packages in main should be able to satisfy all recommend
relations in main.
Bug-User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug-Tag: goal-recommends
I looked at eve
Amaya wrote:
> * gmanedit: upload with a new maintainer, hopefully fixing other bugs too by
> Anibal Alvelar
> * unblock of #453954 by #453966, #453982, #453991, #454016, #454027, #454016
> (Amaya, about to).
Sorry, #453982 should not be marked un-
upload with a new maintainer, hopefully fixing other bugs too by
Anibal Alvelar
* unblock of #453954 by #453966, #453982, #453991, #454016, #454027, #454016
(Amaya, about to).
--
·''`.Moi je voudrais bien, un beau matin, qu&
Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> I'm planning to file bugs for packages that use non-UTF-8 encodings in
> debian/control and/or debian/copyright.
Can you report on any progress in this?
Is there a bug that already tracks this issue?
Thanks
--
·''`.Moi je voudrais bien, un beau matin, qu'il y ait
Sorry for the late reply...
Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Same here, I don't think that I need sudo access curently.
Nor do I. I never needed it in a couple of years. Please do not give me
any special rights. I can work pretty well like it is now (when I come
back from VAC).
--
·''`. If I
Hi Paul,
Paul Adams wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 10:24:06AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> > a European Commission funded project (called SQO-OSS) that's looking
> > into methods for mining various forms of data associated with Free
> > Software, and so deriving metrics that could be used to jud
Ana Guerrero wrote:
> This is explained in #404210.
Ok. Thanks for the pointer.
Now, how can I help so that this goes away? :)
--
·''`. If I can't dance to it, it's not my revolution
: :' :-- Emma Goldman
`. `' Proudly runnin
As you can see at: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=amaya
the package beep-media-player still appears as NMUed by me, even though,
I think it should not:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/beep-media-player/news/20061201T001703Z.html
Changed-By: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
h01ger wrote:
> I suggest to remove it.
I agree.
--
·''`. If I can't dance to it, it's not my revolution
: :' :-- Emma Goldman
`. `' Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (unstable)
`- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com w
Hi, Mark
Marc SCHAEFER wrote:
> did Debian QA ever consider running a test suite just before a
> release?
I would guess so, but ATM we are too busy with the release :)
> Debian QA could even add some specific tests using the provider
> framework.
I haven't really looked at it, but I think it is
Hi there, Tolimar,
Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> Sorry, I forgot about that ITA. I'm workong in it right now and
> should upload in a couple of minutes.
No problema at all. I just want those NMUs to dissappear from my qa page
so that I don't have to track them for new important bugs }:)
--
·''`
* Disclaimer: I suck at ascii-art *
After a series of (loving) NMUs in January (xlibs-dev transition) and
July (/usr/doc transition), I came acrross a long list of packages whose
maintainers didn't ack the NMU, respond, care.
I have come up with a list of packages that could be orphaned (
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le mar 8 août 2006 00:00, Matt Zimmerman a écrit :
> > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 10:15:30PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > apt-listchanges (4 NMUs)
> >
> > Needs a new upstream; it has mostly minor bugs but needs general
> > maintenance (which is what the NMUs were).
>
Joey Hess wrote:
> FWIW, that's all I used for the original mass bug filing. As noted, it
> won't catch some edge cases.
Thanks! I am starting to get random submissions of users by email,
giving me a listing of their /usr/doc after an upgrade :)
Users are really cute!
--
·''`. Policy
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Yep, piuparts does check for it, and there's been bugs reported based
> on it, though not too many. See #375727 or #338238 for example.
Do you keep a logfile of what was filed and when?
I need to assign appropiate blockers for the transition bug.
> Piuparts log file proce
Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Agreed; It is my understanding that it is wrong to put such
> functionality in the {pre,post}rm scripts, because then the /usr/doc/
> link will exist (minimally) until the package is removed or upgraded
> (all 4 scripts are called at some point during a successful upgrade).
Luk Claes wrote:
> Isn't this one of the use cases of piuparts?
Only if it can install an ancient version and test that the link is
removed on upgrade.
Lars?
--
·''`. Policy is your friend. Trust the Policy.
: :' : Love the Policy. Obey the Policy. -- Lars Wirzenius
`. `'
Stefan Huehner wrote:
> http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tpostinst-should-not-set-usr-doc-link.html
Most of the packages on this list have been already NMUed by 'yours
faithfully' :)
So I guess I need to manually inspect, basically:
gcc-h8300-hms
gmt-coast-low
libradius1-dev
libradius1
libr
Hi there, Stefan
Stefan Huehner wrote:
> i think lintian has a check for this issue. Please look into [1] if
> this is what you need.
> http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tpostinst-should-not-set-usr-doc-link.html
Great pointer.
I guess what I also really need is to find out what packages had th
Hi there!
I have been working on #322762 "/usr/doc still exists (transition
tracking bug)".
I am wondering if there's any semi-automatic way to test the archive
again (this mass-bug-filing was done on 12 Aug 2005), so that we can
make sure there are no packages installing a symlink under /usr/do
George Danchev wrote:
> Well right, but I have my reasoing for the new upstream release
> described here:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2006/07/msg00201.html
I never said newest upstream was a bad idea ;)
I just didn't want an NMU, but a new maintainer :)
> Sure. Anyway I prepared a -1
Hi George,
George Danchev wrote:
> It is already done.
I took a look at you rpackage today, and the changelog:
* Non-maintainer upload.
* New upstream release. (Closes: #338451)
I think if you are going to package a newer Upstream version, which is
completely out of scope for an NMU, you s
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> It would help if the MIA team then orphaned all his packages at once
> to make their status clear.
There is still some steps that need to happen before doing this, as he
was responsive to mia pings last March.
--
.''`. Fuck your fascist beauty standards
: :
George Danchev wrote:
> Good. Let's do that as real NMU first, i.e. with Polkan as maintainer
> and let him has his last chance to respond. For the next upload I will
> add myself in Uploaders, along with keeping him in Maintainer: also.
Great solution. Please ping me when you are ready.
--
.''
I am also contacting the sponsor of shc too.
--
.''`. Fuck your fascist beauty standards
: :' :
`. `' Proudly running unstable Debian GNU/Linux
`- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
Hi there, George (and Polkan)
George Danchev wrote:
> Advice: I've been told to consult the QA team for advice and for
> formal MIA tracking. If the package is to be left in the cold, I'm
> ready to take it over adding myself to Uploaders:, while the original
> Maintainer: will remain as it
Paul Wise wrote:
> To debian-qa folks and the debian maintainer:
> What do we think about removing messagewall from debian?
It will be sad to see it go, as I have used it thoroughly (though not in
Debian systems, and with great bitterness beacuse of this).
Knowing Messagewall as I do, in my opini
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Heya,
Hey...
> I've just NMUed qcad to help with the xlibs-dev transition. I also did
> some changes to the packaging to address the concerns Frank had in
> #321671, but this package urgently needs a new maintainer. I'd propose
> to orphan it in the next few weeks.
Marc Singer wrote:
> I don't think that this is valid. You don't know if a package uses
> autoconf.
Hey! I didn't even know what package it was LOL
Blind guessing...
> This wouldn't have helped in the case of this package. Rerunning
> autoconf didn't change the configure script. I updated it
Marc Singer wrote:
> I was wrong, the package does use autoconf. I'm not doing the build,
> the autobuilder is.
Here is what vorlon tought me to do:
cd packagesrc-0.0/
autoconf
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -uc -us -b
cd ..
pbuilder build package*dsc
Do you want me to test this for you and gener
Marc Singer wrote:
> I'm getting a build failure on s390 for the updated package. For some
Which one?
> reason, the libX11.a librarary isn't being found by ld. It's looking
> in /usr/X11R6/lib. Am I misunderstanding another change in the X11
> libraries?
Does re-running autoconf help?
--
.
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for the update on the status of this.
Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> 346760 maintainer has demands
Just upload and orphan. He doesn't seem to want to do it himself.
Can we tag the bugs you already fixed in an upload as "pending"?
This way it is much easier to keep track of the ones
Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Unfortunately my first round didn't use the script (though I was aware
> of it), and so many packages say "(no replacement needed)", even
> though they have a direct build-dep on some package which used to be
> depended on by xlibs-dev. So I'm going back through the bugs and
Hi there, Justin
Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Each of the bugs tagged patch has a short note with the necessary
> change b-d.
I intend to do this:
http://paste.debian.net/3743
And I am very interested in your work... I would like to see a list of
those bugs, specifically the ones *you* fixed.
I am in
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > We are also working into getting newest upstream version in Sarge.
> > Hope is free isn't it? :-)
>
> Just be sure not to upload to sarge until the release! :)
Don not tempt me... I warn you
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> For a while I've been tracking the sarge inclusion of QA-managed
> packages. Here is a status report. Some of you are getting this
> because you have done something relevant to one or more of these
> packages and should stay on top of things. But I have set the
> Rep
Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> The following packages have to be orphaned/adopted:
As I stated at [EMAIL PROTECTED], I intend to adopt lirc, I have not had
time to issue an ITA, since I am reading my email for the first time
since Monday morning.
This is because Last weekend Ranty and I joked a
Doug Balmer dijo:
> and my requests have gone un-noticed. I have mailed the maintainer 3
> times in total and never had a response. I attached a diff to my post
> which will fix the 'Important bug'.
I think the Right Thing (tm) is to try to ask if someone knows if he is
MIA (Missing In Action) in
47 matches
Mail list logo
